Netflix's "Cuties" - The Preteen Sexual Objectification Equivalent of "Funny Games"

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Getting tard comed said:
Really strange hill to die on
Click to expand...
I really don't get this. It isn't even remotely defensible. Its fucking disgusting. Cuties is softcore child porn and it is fucking idiotic to defend it. If they used adults for the dancing and just portrayed them as young, nobody would care. But they're using actual children in highly sexualized scenes. Not only does that defeat the point of the movie, it is fap material for pedophiles. No pedo is going to look at the dance scene and go "Oh that's wrong." Pathetic.
 
OvercookedBacon said:
>someone from Hounddog
>a movie featuring Dakota Fanning, who was twelve at the time, in a rape scene
>why am I not surprised
Click to expand...
That someone, Deborah Kampmeier, was actually the director, writer, and producer of that movie.

She was also the director of Virgin (2003), a movie who's plot summary is, and I quote: "When teenage Jessie, raised very religiously, finds herself pregnant, with no memory of having had sex, she determines that she is carrying the child of God." And the co-director/screenplay writer of Split (2016), that movie about the man with multiple personality disorder kidnapping three little girls.

That entire list, in general, just comes off as a "Who's Who" of Hollywood degenerates.
 
OmnipotentStupidity said:
That someone, Deborah Kampmeier, was actually the director, writer, and producer of that movie.

She was also the director of Virgin (2003), a movie who's plot summary is, and I quote: "When teenage Jessie, raised very religiously, finds herself pregnant, with no memory of having had sex, she determines that she is carrying the child of God." And the co-director/screenplay writer of Split (2016), that movie about the man with multiple personality disorder kidnapping three little girls.

That entire list, in general, just comes off as a "Who's Who" of Hollywood degenerates.
Click to expand...
Wait those names under the letter aren't all porn stars/films?
 
OmnipotentStupidity said:
That someone, Deborah Kampmeier, was actually the director, writer, and producer of that movie.

She was also the director of Virgin (2003), a movie who's plot summary is, and I quote: "When teenage Jessie, raised very religiously, finds herself pregnant, with no memory of having had sex, she determines that she is carrying the child of God." And the co-director/screenplay writer of Split (2016), that movie about the man with multiple personality disorder kidnapping three little girls.

That entire list, in general, just comes off as a "Who's Who" of Hollywood degenerates.
Click to expand...
Well, that just makes the whole thing better! /sneed
 
The only people defending this movie are:

A) People from the left who heard that the hate towards this film was a Right Wing Conspiracy and immediately jumped to the defend it because fuck the righties! Yes, people really are that reactionary and stupid.

B) Degenerates I would never have allowed near my own child even before the movie, so them defending this movie only adds to the pile of evidence.
 
Last edited:
Positron said:
View attachment 1648192
This letter was published on, of all sites, rogerebert.com.
Click to expand...
That's not so surprising. Ebert was one of the very few good reviewers. All other reviewers are of the type that they praise movies like shortbus or female ghostbusters as the best movies ever. Of course, after death these type of icons always get subverted extra, much like disney.
 
Therealhomor said:
In Requiem for a Dream, one of the most famous scenes is of the female lead and an unnamed other girl going "ass to ass" with a double-ended dildo in front of a crowd of men in a sleazy strip club for heroin money. While the scene is very sexual, it isn't even remotely sexy. Everything is grimey, dirty, the two girls look horrified and miserable, the men are acting feral, aggressive and totally uncaring, one guy shoves a wad of cash in the girl's mouth. It's an ugly, disgusting, upsetting unsexy scene and it's meant to be, and it works perfectly.
Click to expand...
Thats hot.
 
Piga Dgrifm said:
Why does MovieBlob think it's just QAnon Autists who think this movie is gross, rather than just anyone with a functional pair of eyes?
Click to expand...
Because that was the narrative the media went with. I noticed not long after Cuties came out and they started blaming the right wing for having issues with it that suddenly the talk of the "QAnon child trafficking" conspiracy started exploding, so now any concerns about child sexual abuse are being hand waved away as QAnon bullshit.
 
ToddleDoddle said:
Because that was the narrative the media went with. I noticed not long after Cuties came out and they started blaming the right wing for having issues with it that suddenly the talk of the "QAnon child trafficking" conspiracy started exploding, so now any concerns about child sexual abuse are being hand waved away as QAnon bullshit.
Click to expand...
CBS Sunday Morning literally just did a QAnon piece to scare all the libtard boomers today. Funny coincidence
 
There's been dozens of films that have either been about or briefly covered topics similar to the sexualization of kids/teens successfully without becoming softcore porn. There is nothing to defend here.

Somewhere on the world wide web, this conversation is occurring:

"The shows on ID like Scorned: Love Kills are just softcore porn for soccer moms."
"Why do you think so?"
"They're not naked but there's still drawn out scenes of women in lingerie with shirtless men in sexual situations and making out."
"So by that definition Cuties is softcore child porn?"
"Aaaaahhhhhcktualllyyyy....."
RumblyTumbly said:
I always thought of the Skeksis as vulture people, kind of like Vultureman from Thundercats.

If you look at the Skeksis and think "Jews", I think you might be the anti-semite. Just saying.
Click to expand...
Similarly, if you look at the Orcs in LOTR and think "Jews" or "black people," you might be of a specific mindset.
 
Clockwork_PurBle said:
Similarly, if you look at the Orcs in LOTR and think "Jews" or "black people," you might be of a specific mindset.
Click to expand...

Woketards quite literally believe nonwhites are subhuman inferiors who need to be protected by the magnanimity of white saviors.

Piga Dgrifm said:
Why does MovieBlob think it's just QAnon Autists who think this movie is gross, rather than just anyone with a functional pair of eyes?
Click to expand...

Because he is a moronic NPC who just echoes propaganda from the mainstream media. And probably he's a pedo too.
 
Piga Dgrifm said:
Why does MovieBlob think it's just QAnon Autists who think this movie is gross, rather than just anyone with a functional pair of eyes?
Click to expand...
Because the arteries that go to his logic centers have been clogged up for decades, and he thinks everything is some kind of conspiracy of some sort. And since he's supporting the movie, that mean he's in full on defense mode trying to defect anything aimed at Netflix, those who like Cuties, or himself. The latter especially since now we can make fun of both his unheathly physical appearance and his possibly unhealthy obsession of children.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom