Netflix's "Cuties" - The Preteen Sexual Objectification Equivalent of "Funny Games"

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
So many fucking dorks are defending this movie because the detractors are "alt-right" or whatever. Imagine defending fucking child porn to own the rightoids. Here I was, smooth brain that I am, thinking that maybe the left and the right could come together to shit on Cuties collectively, and denounce it for what it is: softcore child porn, that absolutely should not be on Netflix, let alone even be produced at all. But, no, I was naive in hoping that, which I realized when I saw lefties and "journalists," that should be rounded up and shot (in Minecraft), call everyone a stupid fucking moron for saying "geez, this movie is kind of fucked." Maybe, I'll know better than to get my hopes up in the future
This is how they've managed to successfully normalize so much deviancy. First, get the public to believe that being labeled as (buzzword) is the worst thing that could possibly happen to them and ensure that by destroying the lives of any outward dessenters, then when you try to push what's considered normal/acceptable and opposition is inevitably raised, just spout that said opposition is (buzzword) to get any and all on-the-fencers to fall in line with your deviancy no matter how repulsive and reprehensible.

Give me the rainbows however, but I think this time they just might have overplayed their hand too early. Even many millennial leftists I'm acquainted with aren't agreeing with this shit as pedophilia seems to be the lowest bar they avoid (at least for now).
 
This was at the Ace of Spades blog. The article is behind a pay subscriber newsletter wall, but the excerpts shown are from Ben Domensch, the founder of The Federalist, being called by the CCO of Netflix and trying to be shamed for thinking Cuties is pedo bait and it's all Qanon conspiracy.

To say this call was disturbing would minimize the content. First, it included an aggressive dismissal of any critiques as being indicative of backwards cultural tendencies and being out of touch with intelligent assumptions about child pornography. It indicated that someone whose literal job is communications for Netflix apparently thinks they have the power to badger people in how they cover the platform's content. And there was a moralizing tone to it which, frankly, came across as a pseudo-refined European insult to knuckle dragging Americans who fear what they do not comprehend.
...


She expressed doubts whether I had seen the film. I said I had seen the trailer and the clip of the performance. She said I needed to see it in context. I said I don't need to see the context of a two minute sequence any pedophile could use as jack off material. She said I clearly didn't understand the point. I said people can like the film if they want, but that my wife and I had already talked about it and decided anyone who likes the film isn't welcome around our child. She said well under that standard then she wouldn't be welcome around our child. I said I didn't know her anyway, and this wasn't a first impression that would inspire me to reconsider.


The conversation escalated quickly into a yelling match. She invoked "conspiracy theories" (I assume QAnon) as something driving negative opinions about the film, suggesting that was my motivation. I said that the fact Netflix CEO Reed Hastings would tweet out an article suggesting this is the source of critiques of the film showed how out of touch Netflix was on the subject, and raised the point that when Nancy Pelosi's daughter and Tulsi Gabbard are hitting you politically at the same time as Ted Cruz and Tom Cotton, it means you misjudged the moment. She said she wouldn't be judged by me on child trafficking and I had no clue what I was talking about.


I have never had a call that was more insulting from any communications person in my entire life, and as you might expect, I get about a dozen calls from comms people in a week trying to influence coverage. If you thought Netflix was out of touch before, this should absolutely cement it. They view critiques of Cuties as nothing more than conspiratorial prudishness and the people who raise such critiques as backwards Americans who don't understand context. In other words, they're just as stupid and out of touch as Alyssa Rosenberg.


Cancel Netflix. Seriously. They're bad people.


PS: I saw a tweet being shared from Cathy Young that if you're in favor of cancelling Netflix over Cuties, it means you give up your right to complain about "cancel culture". Can someone explain to Cathy what "cancel culture" is? The entire point is "cancelling"-- threatening the livelihood -- of people over comments and positions that are well within the mainstream. Having sex with children is not included in that.

The manic defense in the past week went from just smug coastal liberals being themselves to this creepier pedos > everything we consider rightwing. At Rotten Tomatoes it's still sitting at a 89/12 ratio.
 
This was at the Ace of Spades blog. The article is behind a pay subscriber newsletter wall, but the excerpts shown are from Ben Domensch, the founder of The Federalist, being called by the CCO of Netflix and trying to be shamed for thinking Cuties is pedo bait and it's all Qanon conspiracy.



The manic defense in the past week went from just smug coastal liberals being themselves to this creepier pedos > everything we consider rightwing. At Rotten Tomatoes it's still sitting at a 89/12 ratio.
Really informative post and again I'm very curious about that specific CCO and Netflix in general's perspective on this. It sounds like, she atleast, actually is a true believer(tm) and doesn't comprehend sexualizing children in the process of sexualizing children is bad. I really want to know how people square that circle.

How much does the politicization of this impact the decision making process of people like her? The right is such a bogey man that if the right dislikes it she has to like and support it because politics? People are acting very strangely.

Also, seeing as this is the second month in a row they are experiencing HUGE losses in stock value I wonder if they'll learn the lesson or double down. Sounds like she's an EsJayDoubleYou so it's a good bet next month will also have huge losses.
 
How much does the politicization of this impact the decision making process of people like her? The right is such a bogey man that if the right dislikes it she has to like and support it because politics? People are acting very strangely.

Its amazing. Part of what I hate about modern politics is the tribalistic nature of everything.

If the left hates something, the right defends it. If the right hates something, the left defends it. The idea of common ground seems foreign at this point.

And here we are. It has reached its zenith. We actually have the left defending a weird movie that promotes half naked children doing sexualized dances in their attempt to fight the right. It boggles my mind.
 
(((Sylvain de Zangroniz))) was the film's Producer. (((Marc Randolph))) is the co-founder and former CEO of Netflix. Every. Single. Time.

Also (((Jeffrey Epstein))) (((John Money))) (((Joseph Rosenbaum))) (((Roman Polanski))) (((Bryan Singer))) (((Jared Fogle)))

JW 180 Israel Pe.png


 
Last edited:
And here we are. It has reached its zenith. We actually have the left defending a weird movie that promotes half naked children doing sexualized dances in their attempt to fight the right. It boggles my mind.

Meanwhile people in the real world, left-leaning and right-leaning, are fucking disgusted with this film.

Late stage hyperpartisanship is an ugly beast.
 
Last edited:
Its amazing. Part of what I hate about modern politics is the tribalistic nature of everything.

If the left hates something, the right defends it. If the right hates something, the left defends it. The idea of common ground seems foreign at this point.

And here we are. It has reached its zenith. We actually have the left defending a weird movie that promotes half naked children doing sexualized dances in their attempt to fight the right. It boggles my mind.
Meanwhile, people in the real world, left-leaning and right-leaning are fucking disgusted with this film.

Late stage hyperpartisanship is an ugly beast.

Sorry, but leftists have always been degenerate little spiteful shits.

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/tranny-sideshows-on-social-media.33028/page-676#post-5709148

What is negative feminism and anti-social queer theory? My fragmentary answer: it is a queer critique that aims to decenter positivity, productivity, redemptive politics of affirmation, narratives of success, and politics that are founded on hope for an imagined future. It’s rude politics and has no interest in being polite. It embraces masochism, anti-production, self-destructiveness, abjection, forgetfulness, radical passivity, aggressive negation, unintelligibility, negativity, punk pugilism, and anti-social attitudes as a form of resistance to liberal feminist and gay politics of cohesion. It’s about not-becoming because the notion of becoming is perceived as following the capitalist logic of production and models of success that are often tied up with colonialism. It asks, why the fuck should queers be nice? And asserts that politeness is heteronormative and we should embrace our utter failure at functioning within a colonialist, heteronormative, capitalist, racist, sexist and transphobic framework. Jack “Judith” Halberstam is an academic who has probably articulated this theory most lately. I want to talk about his theories and raise some pressing questions and criticisms of his controversial ideas in the context of my limited conversations with him. This essay is largely based on Jack’s article, The Anti-Social Turn in Queer Studies (pdf).

its inherent to leftism that society as it is must be destroyed, the family must be destroyed, everything must be destroyed.

There is no such thing as proper conservatives. What we have is leftism going even deeper into its degeneracy leaving behind what was the past left who are now called right wingers. Or to put it another way, its leftists vs liberals.

Its always the Jews. Anyone here who is Jewish? Can you please tell us why your people are seemingly out to push degeneracy so much that people begin to hate jews?
 
I'm being serious. I don't hate jews but one cannot deny that it seems like all of the media who spews this shit are jewish. It like fucking expected at this point.
so what's the explanation that she's black and french? pedophilia seems to be a bit of a historic trend in france.
 
Back
Top Bottom