🪦 Deceased Nathan Larson / Tisane / Lysander / Leucosticte - Creepy pedo "incel" LOLbertarian Putin and Breivik lovechild.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Fangsofjeff said:
No one would spend 3 years in prison for the lulz, nor would they ruin their reputation by publicly talking about child rape. This dude's the real deal.
Click to expand...
Good point. (:_( On the plus side the fact he's so open about it means less work for us in digging up dirt on him. But this fucker wouldn't be running if it wasn't for the democratic governor. Who passed a law saying if you were a felon you can now vote and run for office! Thanks democrats.
 
Friend of mine posted about this dude on her FB yesterday talking about how she cried after reading this and can't understand why we let people like him exist.

As a Kiwi Farmer, I've seen several people like him and some worse. Guess I've finally become...comfortably numb.

but seriously who lets felons run for office tf
 
If this is the kind of person infiltrating the Libertarian Party, they really need to do some cleaning house. And that's from someone who wants Democrats and Republicans to all go to Hell.

I can get behind many of his libertarian ideals (legalize all guns, drugs, etc.) but his association with the incel community is going to be his downfall, not to mention his pedophilic tendencies.

Incidentally, many incels are pissed off that women are choosing to have children with a known pedophile like this guy.
 
I don't get it. The guy was actually married to a woman. Why would he want to bring the "joys of marriage" to his fellow incels? Why even be akin to the incel philosophy when he's already experienced sex?
 
Pac said:
I don't get it. The guy was actually married to a woman. Why would he want to bring the "joys of marriage" to his fellow incels? Why even be akin to the incel philosophy when he's already experienced sex?
Click to expand...
Probably because he’s insane.
 
Pac said:
I don't get it. The guy was actually married to a woman. Why would he want to bring the "joys of marriage" to his fellow incels? Why even be akin to the incel philosophy when he's already experienced sex?
Click to expand...

Ironic considering that most incels who "finally" get a girlfriend and/or sex abandon that community. I suppose some boards have come to expect this, but this guy is truly a disturbing anomaly, who isn't even that popular with incels to begin with.

Testaclese Maximus said:
Probably because he’s insane.
Click to expand...

This is probably a likely scenario. Especially if he's defending pedophiles as "just another preference like being gay" or whatever.

Whatever though, I guess I'm a conservative bigot who doesn't understand the struggles that pedophiles go through in modern America or whatever.
 
He looks like Hans Deus Vult Brevik.
 
Duke Nukem said:
If this is the kind of person infiltrating the Libertarian Party, they really need to do some cleaning house. And that's from someone who wants Democrats and Republicans to all go to Hell.

I can get behind many of his libertarian ideals (legalize all guns, drugs, etc.) but his association with the incel community is going to be his downfall, not to mention his pedophilic tendencies.

Incidentally, many incels are pissed off that women are choosing to have children with a known pedophile like this guy.
Click to expand...
The government shouldn't exisit, because it's wrong and a force

but.... we need a full socialist system to get my dick wet. The LP has needed serious house cleaning for a long time but letting people like this in are pure cancer, he's a commie when it comes to waifu's and no one seems to mind because he says I got no beef with pot.
 
I honestly believe he's missing a vital piece of his brain that understands the logic behind societal limits.

We don't approve of child rape because children are nigh always unable to defend themselves, we are hardwired to defend our young, and society that is remotely civilized understand children cannot sexually consent under a certain age with full knowledge and understanding of the consequences.

We don't approve of cannibalism because no sane person wants to be the lunch of another, no relative wants to see the corpse of another defiled, and it's dangerous to the sanitation of society in general and incredibly unhealthy to the cannibal and those around them.

But he intellectually understands this to some extent, but then waves it all away like it's just a personal opinion and still asks "why not?"
 
Pac said:
I don't get it. The guy was actually married to a woman. Why would he want to bring the "joys of marriage" to his fellow incels? Why even be akin to the incel philosophy when he's already experienced sex?
Click to expand...
Incels think Chads are the only ones who truly have sex. Basically if you're not a Chad and somehow have sex anyway, it's gotta be because the disgusting femoid was afraid of you or because she was brainwashed into fucking you. There's no way she'd truly open her legs for a disgusting 0/10 incel, amirite ?

There's also the fact that this dude is a batshit insane autist starving for attention, and the Incel community has been getting plenty of it as of late.
 
Pac said:
I don't get it. The guy was actually married to a woman. Why would he want to bring the "joys of marriage" to his fellow incels? Why even be akin to the incel philosophy when he's already experienced sex?
Click to expand...
He's not an incel at all. He's had two wives, several girlfriends and at least one threesome. He just wants attention and kids to molest. In his lolcow manifesto, he talks about infiltrating communities in an attempt to gain control over sections of them. I'm pretty sure that and the fact incels tend to be sympathetic to pedorapists are the only reasons he affiliated himself with incels.
The more readers you have responding to your posts, the easier it is to stay motivated to write high-quality content, which then attract more readers in a virtuous cycle. But the opposite (few readers and low-quality posts) can become a vicious cycle. So the question is, how to get that momentum going? I've tried a few different strategies for this:
  1. Find existing communities that were having problems, and attract their users (or at least their dissidents) to a new community. E.g. Libertapedia, RationalWikiWikiWiki, ChildWiki, and Incelocalypse were all spinoffs of existing sites. It can be challenging, though, to get to, and maintain, a critical mass of users that will attract the quality content needed to keep people interested.
  2. Create a new website affiliated with an existing successful blog. E.g. Kings Wiki, the wiki component of the Return of Kings family of websites. You have to be able to get along with the users of the blog, though, which is where I ran into problems. You have to conform somewhat to the culture that already exists and not cross any red lines.
  3. Find some kind of niche, or crossover between niches, that people haven't covered yet. E.g., Suicidal Pedophiles Forum. The problem I ran into with that is, suicidal pedophiles aren't known for being the most dynamic individuals compared to, say, suicidal incels.
  4. Try to become a famous web entrepreneur by developing some new software that will enable doing something that hasn't been done before, or doing something better than it's been done before. I'm still working on that. It's much harder to develop new software than it is to work with the code that's already available, but your powers are greatly expanded once you're no longer limited to what others are willing to code.
  5. Pursue IRL activism that will attract blog readers as they wonder, "Who is this guy" and google you. Problem is, you have to continue the activism or else your readership drops off when you stop being relevant IRL. Also, IRL activism requires you to get off your ass and get out of your comfort zone, so you'll probably need some supporters, maybe even some more experienced mentors, to help you stay motivated and show you the ropes.
  6. Get the support of more popular bloggers, so that they link to your site and attract readers to it. You already did that, but then maybe lost some of their goodwill when you deleted your old blog, because it made you seem unstable. You're going to have to rebuild that goodwill somehow (maybe by reaching a new audience and starting fresh) if you want to go that route. I imagine the best way to do that would be to write quality content that is superior to what exists elsewhere, or covers stuff that isn't covered elsewhere. That way, you can attract incoming links, which is how you bring in traffic.
  7. Become extremely active in a community that already exists and make a name for yourself. The problem with that is, this will divert a lot of your attention from your blog to that community. But what you can often do is cross-post your forum writings to your blog.
The more creative you are in coming up with innovative ideas, and the harder you're willing to work to implement those ideas, and the more balls you have to do stuff that others would be afraid to do, the better results you can get, because you'll be doing stuff that others aren't able to do. It puts you in more of a leadership position relative to the more passive masses.
If I also had some better social skills, that would be a force-multiplier, but then I might also be tempted not to take the radical stances I take, because popularity would be more within reach, and I would be better able to calculate what people will and won't respond favorably to.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure what these links were, but they look a whole lot like CP. I censored the one outgoing link, the other stuff shouldn't be accessible anymore since it looks like it was hosted on his site.
sitess.png http://archive.is/Z5hAF

Hey, wanna hear about Nathan's piss?
The longest fast without food or water was called the "six-day war" because it lasted six days. It ended when a celly of Nathan's, Matthew Newingham, expressed concern about his not eating, which suggested an intervention might be coming. Nathan then went to the chow hall and drank large amounts of the orange kool-aid-like drink, and later experienced a strange reaction/effect, never seen by him before or since, in which when he peed, an orange, sugar-like, powdery or granulated substance came out, so that it was like peeing an extremely saturated kool-aid solution. This happened several times before whatever it was, was gone.
Click to expand...
http://archive.is/fRGyH

Apparently he ran a wordpress blog called the dailyantifeminist but instead of focusing on general manosphere stuff he kept ranting about wanting to fuck children.
http://archive.is/y7Y1v

sperginity said:
Is running for Congress a developmental milestone for lolcows or something?
Click to expand...
If Chris ran for congress I'd vote for him tbh.
 
Last edited:
So this guy is basically a wannabe libertarian nutjob with a savior complex towards the incel community. Wonderful.

Also about that IncelTears post, LOL @ thinking the prison guards will let you have the nudes, especially if your crimes are sexually motivated.
 
Yaoi Huntress Earth said:
Nathan Larson (not to be confused with the guitarist) is an independent who is running for congress in Virginia. A proud paedophile who claims to have raped his first wife and wants to legalize child porn. (I even checked other news sources to make sure HuffPo was telling the truth.) Here's some choice lines from the guy...




Here's a post he made on a forum...
5b10986d1a00002700ce0431.png
Click to expand...
It wasn't just a forum, it was his forum. He owned it. I'll repeat what I said before:

Other screenshots of his posts on incelocalypse can be found in the incel thread starting on page 257 and continuing until page 265 or so. His username there was, of course, Leucosticte.
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/incels-org-previously-known-as-r-incels.22268/page-257

Editing my post isn't working, so I'll just double post and mods can merge my posts together or whatever.

Nathan wrote memoirs about his life. They're long and his memoirs from 2009 to 2013 are missing, but there's some interesting information peppered in what's available.
http://archive.is/B8Ubc
http://archive.is/0MKYc

Here's what he had to say about his attempt to run for congress in 2008 and his threat to kill Obama:
2008 run for U.S. Congress[edit]
I then ran for office in Virginia's 1st Congressional District election, 2008. We held a 1st Congressional District convention on 3 June 2008 in the cable studio in the basement of the Central Rappahannock Regional Library. It was a rainy evening, and only one other member from that District showed up. As chair, I brought up the agenda item of my nomination and he said, "You got it." I suppose that technically, I should have relinquished the chair for that portion of the meeting.

I also was elected delegate to the 2008 Libertarian National Convention. While researching the candidates, I stumbled across Mary Ruwart's article, How I Became a Libertarian, which mentioned that she became an anarchist after reading The Market for Liberty. I read that book and, in the course of my research of various policy issues involved in my Congressional candidacy, also began reading many other books, such as Gabriel Roth's Street Smart: Competition, Entrepreneurship and the Future of Roads, Hans-Hermann Hoppe's The Private Production of Defense, Bruce L. Benson's To Serve and Protect, etc.

It was becoming evident, though, that people really do vote and make other political decisions for shallow reasons – meaningless bullshit, to use a more colorful term. The process is somewhat ridiculous. To obtain ballot access, for instance, you either buy it by paying $2/signature to hire petitioners, or you stand in front of a grocery store, or on public property somewhere, and accost random passers-by. You have only a few seconds to get their attention, and usually they decide to sign or not sign based on first impressions (e.g. your smile and confidence) rather than on anything substantive. It's rational ignorance at work again.

I also ran into a lot of paradoxes/contradictions. People would ask, "What are your chances of winning?" If I were to answer, "Slim to none," it would be accurate, but then the next obvious question is, "Why bother running then?" If I say, "Because I want to raise public awareness of my cause," they'll say, "Well, why don't you just send out a bunch of literature or buy TV ads or something?" The answer is that you can get a lot more free publicity by running for office; e.g. I went on TV several times, and it would have been hard to afford that coverage.

Then there was the question, "If you favor government's abolition, why do you want to be a part of it?" The answer is, "So that we can change the system peacefully; what do you prefer, that we overthrow it by illegal means?" But I usually left out that last part.

As the race went on, I started doubting more and more the workability of ending oppression through democratic channels, and wondering whether it wouldn't be just as well to do what Timothy McVeigh did, and truck-bomb the government. I began discussing the merits of this idea on the Internet, and evidently someone reported me to the FBI. They approached my mother and told her that they had enough evidence to arrest me for terrorism, but that she could avoid that by going to a county magistrate with them and obtaining an emergency detention order placing me in a mental hospital. She did as they asked, and I was hauled away by the local police. They initially took me to the local hospital, where I was handcuffed to a bed while blood samples were drawn. (I was later billed for these diagnostic medical "services" I received against my will.) A sheriff's deputy remained with me at all times until I was safely incarcerated at Prince William Hospital's Center for Psychiatric & Addiction Treatment, where they have bulletproof glass and other security measures to prevent people from escaping. (The glass is indeed virtually unbreakable; in my efforts to escape over the following weeks, I tried to put a heavy wooden chair through it, and all it did was make a slight scratch. But then again, I lack much upper body strength, so wasn't able to put a lot of force into it.)

The next day, I was questioned by a government doctor for a few minutes, who had not been briefed on my situation. I told him that I was running for Congress and that the FBI was investigating me. He said, "Only the FBI? Not the CIA?" He concluded I had severe delusional disorder. My court-appointed lawyer advised me to consent to be held for a few days for evaluation rather than to fight the commitment, because if I were to lose, I could be committed for several months. He told me that the only downside would be that, pursuant to Code of Virginia § 18.2-308.1:3, a law passed after the 2007 Virginia Tech massacre, I would thereafter be forbidden to possess a firearm. I opted for "voluntary" admission.

In the days that followed, though, it became clear that my treating psychiatrist intended not to release me for awhile. He wanted to have neuropsych testing conducted on me, and the timeframe for accomplishing that was unclear, since they lacked the necessary equipment and would need to send me elsewhere. I decided I had other things I needed to do, such as finishing up my Congressional campaign, so I indicated that my presence there was no longer voluntary. The hospital obtained another emergency detention order from the magistrate, and I was brought before the Special Justice. He concluded I was not an imminent danger, and released me.

I continued to research Timothy McVeigh, and after reading the book American Terrorist, concluded that mass destruction was not a good way to try to bring about reform. This lined up with the teachings of Murray Rothbard, who held that guerilla warfare is justified only if it avoids taxing, conscripting, or otherwise harming innocent bystanders. After reading John Ross' book Unintended Consequences, I decided to instead assassinate a high-ranking senator (specifically, Senator Robert Byrd, because of his reputation as the "King of Pork") and prepared this document, which I would carry in my pocket when I liquidated him, for discovery by the police after my arrest:

It was necessary to kill the Senator because he was deeply involved in organized crime, actively directing a coercive cartel's extortion of the American people. It is my hope that the efforts of others will help put this criminal gang out of business for good. Let those who value their freedom rise to the occasion.
The state is a compulsory territorial monopolist of protection and jurisdiction, equipped with the power to tax without unanimous consent. In any situation in which free competition is not allowed, the price of the service will inevitably rise and its quality will inexorably fall. Yet government has forcibly arrogated to itself the power to unilaterally create and enforce law, which all must obey. It has established a protection racket, in which it robs the people of their livelihoods at the point of a gun. It then wastes their money on services that are not needed or that could be more efficiently provided by private industry.

We could obtain much better protection from aggression, at less expense, from private police and private defense agencies. Their potential for abuse would be curtailed by the presence of rival vendors and free choice in a competitive marketplace. Disputes among customers of different protectors could be settled through voluntarily agreed-to arbitration contracts. Compliance with privately-established legal codes could be effectively enforced through ostracism and boycotts of those who dishonored their obligations, rather than through arbitrary punishments handed down by the state.

It is not murder to apply deadly force against an aggressor (such as this Senator) who is committing armed robbery — it is self-defense and justifiable homicide. In an anarcho-capitalist society, we could appeal to the private police forces and dispute resolution organizations of our communities, who would stop the aggression and enforce restitution. But in our country, the police and courts are part of the same criminal gang whose leaders vote away our freedom. There is no effective recourse, but to violent revolution and overthrow of the United States Government.

Some might argue that we should work for change through the political process, rather than resorting to acts of assassination and terrorism. But, to borrow a phrase, libertarians have not been wanting in attentions to our American brethren. "We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us...We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends."

When a majority insists on infringing on the rights of a minority, there are no peaceful, speedy remedies available in a democratic system. The only choice, other than continued slavery, is to take up arms against our oppressors. And so our message to the U.S. Congress, the U.S. President, and the U.S. Supreme Court, is simple. Leave us alone, and stop taking away our property and our freedoms. Otherwise, we will kill you.

May statist oppression be annihilated in the coming anarcho-capitalist revolution.

I attended a National Rifle Association "basic pistol" class in preparation for carrying out the assassination. The class consisted of a classroom segment and then a shooting range segment. At the beginning of the former, the teacher told us that people have stereotypes about what kinds of people become gun owners, but in reality they are people from all walks of life and shouldn't be pigeonholed like that. After the class, she let the other students fire the guns on the range and made me wait till last. She asked which kind I wanted to practice with, the revolver or the other one (I forget what it was called). I chose the latter because it held more ammunition (I figured I might need to shoot the Senator several times to be sure he was dead). Before I got a chance to fire a pistol, my mother showed up to say that she was worried that I was still intending to carry out my plan. The teacher asked, "What plan?" My mother, it turned out, had called ahead to tell the teacher that she was worried about me, and the teacher had deliberately delayed my firing the gun on the range so that my mother had time to arrive. Realizing that I wasn't going to get to complete the class, I walked out. I think the teacher suspected I was going to be one of these guys who uses such situations to get hold of a loaded gun without having to buy it, and then either kills himself or blows everyone else away and then kills himself. Suspicions of the latter would tend to be supported by my seeking the gun with more bullets.
Click to expand...
Looks like he was actually intending to go through with the assassination. How nice of him to let the entire internet know about this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom