Morgane Oger / Ronan Oger - defunded a rape crisis shelter, JY frenemy, sues ppl for misgendering, stalks meghan murphy, EX vp of new dem party that lost 3+ elections

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Jordan B Peterson swoops in with an "I told you so"
View attachment 708963

He is right that regular court is gonna jail him for being unable to pay. He's unwilling too obviously, but he couldn't pay if he wanted to. In the judgement they note that whatcott doesn't have money (he has spent everything on legal defenses for criminal charges stemming from handing out anti-gay flyers at gay pride) and then slammed him with a 55 thousand dollar judgment. They want him in jail for hurt feelings.

It blows me away that they treat this guy like a criminal when he is a dime-a-dozen harmless loon in the states. Theres usually 5 or 10 of them protesting any given gay pride parade, no one cares. The westboro baptist church still has their dumb website and signs. It brought americans together to condemn & fuck with them collectively, and the WBC recruited maybe... 2 people, iirc?

The life site news page points out something i neglected to highlight, when whatcott's attorney wanted to introduce evidence that Oger is a male the judges said that truth wasn't a defense in this case. Truth should be what courts are supposed to be after.


you've pointed out a little known fact: masturbation was invented by al gore when he discovered the internet. before that it was impossible

A few things about this -

  • Human rights tribunals are NOT a court of law, and are subject to neither the evidentiary standards, nor the judicial oversight of one; the people appointed might be judges, but they're appointed by highly partisan politicians.
  • The various SJWs that are ignoring that this will be used to fine people, and then jail those that can't pay the fines? They've forgotten that the next batch of politicians can replace their pet tribunal administrators.
  • In Canada, AFAIK, truth is NOT considered a defense against defamation (libel or slander, as appropriate)
The conservatives are exceptional and will just ban porn instead of reigning in the sjw nonsense.

Have you seen the sex-negative feminists in action? They're trying to ban porn, too.

The thing is though no one cares what the Human Rights in Canada has to say. Everyone knows it's a kangaroo court system. Take your shit to the real courts, I would. You don't even get the chance to bring a lawyer with you in front of the HRT, it's fucking bullshit. They one one who get's the lawyer is the one who brought the case to the HRT. It's why so many women and trans people want to do it that way in Canada.

It's also why feminists have been trying to get courts to forgo jury trials in any criminal case involving any kind of sexual misconduct or assault - a single judge can be pressured to focus on the bullshit "victim-centred judicial process" (which is straight up a dogwhistle for "#BelieveWomen"), and the Parliament of Canada has already gone so far as to make courses that focus on that kind of shit mandatory for federal judges - https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opi...-help-sexual-assault-victims/article36138237/

It's an okay article, but the author missed the key point - believing women are always telling the truth is absurd; they're human beings, entirely fallible, and there's no end of cases demonstrating that they'll lie to punish people.
 
Last edited:
The thing is though no one cares what the Human Rights in Canada has to say. Everyone knows it's a kangaroo court system. Take your shit to the real courts, I would. You don't even get the chance to bring a lawyer with you in front of the HRT, it's fucking bullshit. They one one who get's the lawyer is the one who brought the case to the HRT. It's why so many women and trans people want to do it that way in Canada.

It's fairly inevitable that someone faced with something so obviously illegitimate will decide fuck it and just shoot the son of a bitch. At least that way they'll get an actual trial.
 
A few things about this -

  • Human rights tribunals are NOT a court of law, and are subject to neither the evidentiary standards, nor the judicial oversight of one; the people appointed might be judges, but they're appointed by highly partisan politicians.
  • The various SJWs that are ignoring that this will be used to fine people, and then jail those that can't pay the fines? They've forgotten that the next batch of politicians can replace their pet tribunal administrators.
  • In Canada, AFAIK, truth is NOT considered a defense against defamation (libel or slander, as appropriate)

Have you seen the sex-negative feminists in action? They're trying to ban porn, too.



It's also why feminists have been trying to get courts to forgo jury trials in any criminal case involving any kind of sexual misconduct or assault - a single judge can be pressured to focus on the bullshit "victim-centred judicial process" (which is straight up a dogwhistle for "#BelieveWomen"), and the Parliament of Canada has already gone so far as to make courses that focus on that kind of shit mandatory for federal judges - https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opi...-help-sexual-assault-victims/article36138237/

It's an okay article, but the author missed the key point - believing women are always telling the truth is absurd; they're human beings, entirely fallible, and there's no end of cases demonstrating that they'll lie to punish people.

To clarify, truth isn't a defence in Canada terms of "hate speech" laws, whereas with garden variety libel/slander, truth IS a defence. Not to draw too fine a point on it but there you go.
 
truth isn't a defence in Canada terms of "hate speech" laws
I immediately question the legitimacy of any legal system where this is acceptable. Truth should always be a valid defense. Any time it isn't, you'll find the people responsible are deathly allergic to it.
 
Here we have a the Mythical Oger spin another fairy tale about Dragons and Ogers. This is at an event Oger is ironically attending called "Freedom of Speech in the arts: Voices from the left". If you want to hear them stammer over Oger's name for a few minutes it starts at 41:40. But the best part where she admits to hating free speech is in the link I posted. This was on February 18th, 2019.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBnsO0BPZFA#t=47m04s

I decided to watch it with subtitles to make sure I was hearing it right. It scares me to see Oger on that side of that table.

These are screenshots I took for you guys, I tried to download subtitles to easily copy a transcript but I can't open it. It's some sort of Machine Code. So here's my transcript, I tidied up youtube's typos so hopefully it makes more sense. Giver a break though the videos over an hour and a half and it's boring as fuck so can you blame them for making a few typos trying to stay awake through that?

"...and this is where of course art comes in right, and arts can be harmful and the question is what do we do about it? And I've been the target of harmful art, actually someone painted a picture of someone killing a dragon don't remember who that is, Saints So in So, killing the dragon and put Bill Whatcott,s face on the killing of the dragon, Bill Whatcott's, my opponent in the case(55K$$$$$$$) that just ran through. Where I'm trying to curtail his fundamental right to free speech, and acting out his religious beliefs by claiming that my right to participate in democracy is at least equal. And I guess I was the dragon?!"

"Bill Whatcott's face on the killing of the dragon, Bill Whatcotts, my opponent, in the case that just ran through which where I'm trying to curtail his fundamental right to free speech and acting out his religious beliefs"

"where I'm trying to curtail his fundamental right to free speech and acting out his religious beliefs"

" curtail his fundamental right to free speech"


I made it all one image now so you dont have to click it all.


(...and this is where of course art comes in right, and arts can be)
(harmful and the question is what do we do about it? And I've been the target)
(of harmful art actually someone painted a picture of someone killing a dragon)
(don't remember who that is, Saints So in So, killing the dragon and put Bill Whatcotts)
(face on the killing of the dragon Bill Whatcotts my opponent in the case that)
(just ran through which where I'm trying to curtail his fundamental right to free)
(speech and acting out his religious beliefs by claiming that my right to)
(participate in democracy is at least equal, and I guess I was the dragon?!)
a5e4pWj.png
 
Last edited:
Here we have a the Mythical Oger spin another fairy tale about Dragons and Ogers. This is at an event Oger is ironically attending called "Freedom of Speech in the arts: Voices from the left". If you want to hear them stammer over Oger's name for a few minutes it starts at 41:40. But the best part where she admits to hating free speech is in the link I posted. This was on February 18th, 2019.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBnsO0BPZFA#t=47m04s

I decided to watch it with subtitles to make sure I was hearing it right. It scares me to see Oger on that side of that table.

These are screenshots I took for you guys, I tried to download subtitles to easily copy a transcript but I can't open it. It's some sort of Machine Code. So here's my transcript, I tidied up youtube's typos so hopefully it makes more sense. Giver a break though the videos over an hour and a half and it's boring as fuck so can you blame them for making a few typos trying to stay awake through that?

"...and this is where of course art comes in right, and arts can be harmful and the question is what do we do about it? And I've been the target of harmful art, actually someone painted a picture of someone killing a dragon don't remember who that is, Saints So in So, killing the dragon and put Bill Whatcott,s face on the killing of the dragon, Bill Whatcott's, my opponent in the case(55K$$$$$$$) that just ran through. Where I'm trying to curtail his fundamental right to free speech, and acting out his religious beliefs by claiming that my right to participate in democracy is at least equal. And I guess I was the dragon?!"

"Bill Whatcott's face on the killing of the dragon, Bill Whatcotts, my opponent, in the case that just ran through which where I'm trying to curtail his fundamental right to free speech and acting out his religious beliefs"

"where I'm trying to curtail his fundamental right to free speech and acting out his religious beliefs"

" curtail his fundamental right to free speech"


I made it all one image now so you dont have to click it all.


(...and this is where of course art comes in right, and arts can be)
(harmful and the question is what do we do about it? And I've been the target)
(of harmful art actually someone painted a picture of someone killing a dragon)
(don't remember who that is, Saints So in So, killing the dragon and put Bill Whatcotts)
(face on the killing of the dragon Bill Whatcotts my opponent in the case that)
(just ran through which where I'm trying to curtail his fundamental right to free)
(speech and acting out his religious beliefs by claiming that my right to)
(participate in democracy is at least equal, and I guess I was the dragon?!)
a5e4pWj.png

Ronan Oger / Morgane Oger / Fred Armisen is such a gigantic retard that he thinks pictures and words are legitimately "harmful" and is in favour of using the state to squelch a goddam cartoon that sounds as subtle as a Ben Garrison and is so fucking short-sighted that he cannot imagine (or doesn't care take your pick) this ever coming back to haunt him and his degenerate tranny ilk.

It bears repeating that this isn't just your average delusional troon, this man is (last time I checked) a VP of a major provincial political party.
 
Ronan Oger / Morgane Oger / Fred Armisen is such a gigantic exceptional individual that he thinks pictures and words are legitimately "harmful" and is in favour of using the state to squelch a goddam cartoon that sounds as subtle as a Ben Garrison and is so fucking short-sighted that he cannot imagine (or doesn't care take your pick) this ever coming back to haunt him and his degenerate tranny ilk.

The Rogaine Ogre should be banned for fucking BEING an offensive cartoon.
 
Ronan Oger / Morgane Oger / Fred Armisen is such a gigantic exceptional individual that he thinks pictures and words are legitimately "harmful" and is in favour of using the state to squelch a goddam cartoon that sounds as subtle as a Ben Garrison and is so fucking short-sighted that he cannot imagine (or doesn't care take your pick) this ever coming back to haunt him and his degenerate tranny ilk.

It bears repeating that this isn't just your average delusional troon, this man is (last time I checked) a VP of a major provincial political party.
And a VP so exceptional that common cultural references go straight over his head.

I think ST GEORGE is the name you're thinking of, sweatty. It's a pretty common piece of symbolism in the art world and I fucking hope you caused at least a modicum of cognitive dissonance in that crowd by having no fucking clue.
 
713636

Here it is straight from the Oger's website.


713639

Christmas came early this year everyone.
 
Last edited:
Have you seen the sex-negative feminists in action? They're trying to ban porn, too.
No, they are trying to "eliminate demand" by telling horror stories about the pornography industry. It works about as well as animal rights activists telling people how meat is made. Robert Jensen writes about this issue a lot, in a way that is really accessible.
Anyway.

Oger has just told everyone that "offensive" art gets his man panties in a wad. I see a lot of poorly photoshopped art in his twitter future.
 
I think there's an separatist movement revival in the western provinces again, and has been since Trudeau announced on Quebecois tv that he wanted to 'rob Alberta of it's socio-economic power", just like his dad tried through nationalization of the energy sector. We all know that communism never fails, naturally. O.o

Source of Trudeau's comments - https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/tr...to-address-2010-comments-on-alberta-1.1241750

Separatism only lives in Alberta.
 
Québécois feminists give Oger a scathing takedown. Google translated page and archive.

"Morgane Oger has been repeatedly reported to his party and denounced by women and feminists who have been the target of his attacks and accusations of transphobia. Among other things, in January 2018, he actively sought out the identity and address of a woman whom he accused of "hate speech" for having protested with a sign denouncing the excesses of the transgender movement:
Trans women are men. The truth does not constitute hatred. Do not believe what they say: Transgender ideology is misogynistic and homophobic. Woman is not a "feeling", a costume, nor the staging of a stereotype. Woman is a biological reality. There is no ethical or moral reason to lie to cajole the male ego. Do not call me "cis". Stop stereotypes. I am neither compliant nor non-compliant My favorite prefix is neither cis nor trans. I'm a woman. Resist the Orwellian Newspeak.
"A photo of the woman and the sign had circulated widely on social networks, prompting Oger to launch a witch hunt to punish the shamelessness he "felt that she went too far." The woman was harassed and slandered online, which did not stop Oger from continuing to publish scathing posts about her, effectively feeding insults and threats.

"A year later, Oger has now made every effort to weaken Canada's first women's shelter, claiming to work against "discrimination against women". After announcing the suspension of VRRWS funds, he had fun on Twitter counting the number of donors the center would need if they lost all their funds (which amounted to about 1.1 millions of Canadian dollars a year), titling his tweet with these treacherous words: "The cost of harm". Clearly, Morgane Oger is impatient at the prospect of one day seeing the complete destruction of VRRWS, just because it only welcomes women."
 
Grobian Oger thinks his DNA doesn't say he's male
View attachment 716373"Trans women, non binaries and other asexed unicorns" :story:

(One minor correction: despite the subject matter, the woman who wrote the article is from France, not Québéc)
716397

the only thing this pervert has said that makes sense
 
Grobian Oger thinks his DNA doesn't say he's male
he had a son. that is the proof. Eggs only have X sex chromosomes, and sperm carry either an X (to make an XX girl) or a Y (to make an XY boy). There are fuck ups on that front very rarely (like a sperm having extra X's or Y's less than .01% of the time) and that causes developmental disorders, but as far as I know Oger's son is normal soooo he contributed the Y chromosome. What a fucking idiot.
 
Back
Top Bottom