MASSIVE Erection Thread 2016 - Lizard has the advantage. Trump is spiraling towards defeat.

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
First title
NEtitle.png


second title
title2.png


third title
US 2016 Presidential election Trump victory leaves rivals distressed and confused Kiwi Farms.png


Fourth title
trumptitle4.png


Fifth and Sixth title
new title (1).png


Seventh title
Screenshot_2016-06-07-12-33-22.png


eighth title
Apocalypse 2016.png


Ninth title
Screenshot_2016-07-25-23-47-41~2.jpg


tenth title
title10.png


All discussion of the candidates, updates and results should go here

For example- here's a video of Ted Cruz vying for world domination.


Also Hilary Clinton is a crook and nobody should have sex with her.

Discuss

(Note- The title will change as we get nearer the election, previous titles will be archived in the OP)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
DerSandstrom said:
Most of her supporters are pretty hardened to it because of her husband and the fact that she has a vagina. Otherwise, its the same repeated talking points about children, Russia, experience and that dang, dirty Alt-Right.
Click to expand...

That's a big problem for Clintin though. There's only a limited amount of people who will be swayed by muh vagina and they're already voting for her.
 
PortsideDave said:
The problem is, the allegations against Hillary don't stick. Like that shit she said about calling in a drone strike on Assange. Any normal candidate would be guaranteed a loss right there but not Hillary.
Click to expand...

Because it's old hat now. They've been doing this to Hillary for 30 years now and it feels like someone crying wolf.

They played their cards too early instead of saving them in between debates.
 
Pikimon said:
They've been doing this to Hillary for 30 years now and it feels like someone crying wolf.
Click to expand...
I've not seen much evidence for that. I've noticed family tends to recoil and is genuinely unaware of how criminal Hillary is. Get the sense that the more that bleeds out into the general public the greater a chance of low turnout.

Trump is made out to be the next Hitler by the media, but Clinton has an actual bloody paper trail agonizing over the last three decades since before her first term as a public service member. Shrugging it off as crying wolf is optimistic.
 
Shugo said:
Those all could have happened, but they cut right to the segment and everyone performed fine. It seems like CNN's live segments are scripted, and "undecided voters" are following CNN's script.

I hope it does have a rational explanation but
Click to expand...
This is the kind of post the autistic rating is useful for.

It's fine discussing differing political views but this is conspiracy nonsense.
 
Last edited:
PortsideDave said:
Eh I don't buy the 14 point thing, seems too much of an outlier IMO.

A little off topic, but I keep reading how the Republicans are afraid of losing Congress. Personally I don't think they'll keep congress regardless of who wins. It's gonna go to the Dems this election. However I do think the Republicans will make strong gains next election season.
Click to expand...

If Hillary doesn't win and win big the Rs are going to stay in charge of the House at least. It is currently gerrymandered such that it would require a D+8 wave to switch-- that is, if the overall votes for Democratic representatives don't exceed those for Republicans by at least 8% or 46-54 (remember that every member of the House runs every two years) it'll remain red. If Dems get 52% of the total vote to 48% R it'll remain in Republican control, that's how gerrymandered it is. Democracy!

Senators can't be gerrymandered but they run every 6 years so the picture is different. Right now the senators up for re-election last won in 2010, which was a big Republican wave year, so there are a number of Republicans that are kind of vulnerable (they won races they might have lost in a more normal election last time and aren't really popular). 2010 was also a midterm and not a presidential year, and midterms favor Republicans because of lower turnout. Put that together and this should be a good year for Team Blue. However, Harry Reid is retiring, and as an incumbent in a swing state his seat is vulnerable. Dems also put up some weak challengers in a few states and until recently the Senate really was a coin flip. There is a strong chance it'll be 50-50 so the Vice President will be the deciding vote.

Last week changed that a lot. A lot of these swing state Rs have been running away from Trump at top speed because he's politically toxic in states like Pennsylvania. Hillary and the DNC have avoided tying them to him in an attempt to split the party (which is working, if today's conference call is anything to go by). As of last week, with the Trump campaign imploding, the House is absolutely in play. Fourteen points is an outlier, but if he doesn't do something truly incredible he's en route to a historic defeat. Last night was just not good enough. He needed a big win, and while he didn't shit his pants on stage he didn't win either.
 
Holdek said:
It's fine discussing differing plitical views but this is conspiracy nonsense.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry you're not satisfied if you can't click a picture next to a post you didn't like, now you have to post to express your opinion.

Would you like to explain why the CNN reporter is telling her interview subject the exact line she says before she says repeats it for the camera?
 
Internet War Criminal said:
I'm so glad we still have :feels:
Click to expand...
Same, fam.

Shugo said:
Would you like to explain why the CNN reporter is telling her interview subject the exact line she says before she says repeats it for the camera?
Click to expand...
Fine: because it's what the subject had conveyed in the preinterview and the reporter is reminding her in the most succinct way what she had said. They can't edit or cut live interviews for clarity.
 
Shugo said:
I'm sorry you're not satisfied if you can't click a picture next to a post you didn't like, now you have to post to express your opinion.

Would you like to explain why the CNN reporter is telling her interview subject the exact line she says before she says repeats it for the camera?
Click to expand...
It's just a coincidence man. Just like how it was just a weird coincidence that it looked like Hillary collapsed and coughed her way through a bunch of speeches when she was actually in flawless good health. Just like it was a coincidence when 538 claimed Trump wouldn't win the primary. Just like it was a coincidence that that audio of trump dropped hours after the wikileaks dump. Just like it was a coincidence that Bernie Sanders seemed to be getting fucked over by his own party. Just like the 20 years of coincidences that have followed the Clintons. Only a dumb ass tin foil hat wearing sperg would think there was anything shady going on and that the media would lie to you, this is a presidential campaign.
 
Holdek said:
Fine: because it's what the subject had conveyed in the preinterview and the reporter is reminding her in the most succinct way what she had said. They can't edit or cut live interviews for clarity.
Click to expand...

So CNN "live coverage" and post-debate interviews are from carefully selected groups of people who they interviewed before and they specifically selected the one person who says what they want them to say, and the people they interview are too stupid to remember their own words, or too stupid to condense their own words into smaller sentences.

Either way it doesn't look like CNN does much besides put out propaganda under the guise of interviewing people for their honest opinions. Why do they even bring people on to "interview" when they only pick the ones who say what they want? It's a charade of asking the opinions of an "unsure voter" when they actually just asked the opinion of someone who said exactly what CNN wanted to broadcast.

Ass Manager 3000 said:
What makes me think it's not is because they would have coached them far in advance.
Click to expand...

As I said, you cannot coach someone far in advance for a debate that took place a few minutes prior.
 
Shugo said:
Digging deeper
Click to expand...

This is why it's generally pointless to argue about conspiracy theories. Any explanation you are given you will respond to by detouring back to your original premise in the most logically unpersuasive way.
 
Last edited:
Holdek said:
This is why it's generally pointless to argue about conspiracy theories.
Click to expand...

What is the conspiracy theory? You are claiming CNN is pre-interviewing people before they broadcast live interviews, and they're interviewing people who are too stupid to remember their original response to the interview question.

Is it a conspiracy theory to think this is more of a propaganda technique than a journalism technique when they only air the interviews of people who they asked off-air and decided that person was fit to say what CNN wanted them to say, under the guise of journalism? Or is it just common knowledge anything CNN airs will be heavily filtered and only show the opinions they want you to believe?

If you think it's pointless you can ignore the post. Instead you posted saying you wanted to rate a post autistic but you were sad because it was taken away. What is your obsession with rating posts you don't like autistic?
 
Shugo said:
If you think it's pointless you can ignore the post. Instead you posted saying you wanted to rate a post autistic but you were sad because it was taken away. What is your obsession with rating posts you don't like autistic?
Click to expand...
That's not what I wrote. Go back and read my post again. I was using your post as an example for a discussion that was already being had here by others about ratings in this thread. But yeah generally I'll just skim past conspiracy theories and other nonsense.

In any event, here's more explanation, not that it'll make any difference for you:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/cnn-trump-rigged-focus-group-debate-229563
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom