MASSIVE Erection Thread 2016 - Lizard has the advantage. Trump is spiraling towards defeat.

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
First title
NEtitle.png


second title
title2.png


third title
US 2016 Presidential election Trump victory leaves rivals distressed and confused Kiwi Farms.png


Fourth title
trumptitle4.png


Fifth and Sixth title
new title (1).png


Seventh title
Screenshot_2016-06-07-12-33-22.png


eighth title
Apocalypse 2016.png


Ninth title
Screenshot_2016-07-25-23-47-41~2.jpg


tenth title
title10.png


All discussion of the candidates, updates and results should go here

For example- here's a video of Ted Cruz vying for world domination.


Also Hilary Clinton is a crook and nobody should have sex with her.

Discuss

(Note- The title will change as we get nearer the election, previous titles will be archived in the OP)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
Good news: there's a direct line to the FBI you can call if anyone's doing any ballot intimidation and they respond right away. No chance of shitty local or state police deciding to look the other way.
 
Who is more dril-like, the actual @dril or Donald Trump?
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    67.8 KB · Views: 101
Skeealator said:
We're not going to see WWIII, we're not going to get into a shooting war any more than Reagan and Gorby wanted to get into a war.
Click to expand...
When Reagan was elected President, his hawkishness really scared the Soviet leadership - they seriously expected him to start WW3, and their expectations were only reinforced by his decision to create SDI (endangering MAD, thus implying he was planning to launch a first strike) and move Pershing II missiles into Western Europe (2-3 minutes from launch till hitting targets in European USSR - it would leave no time for Soviet leadership to react, making decapitation strikes a possibility). Eventually, they interpreted the legend of Able Archer 83 as preparations for a first nuclear strike against the USSR, nearly leading to WW3.

Autumn 2016: when it became clear that Hillary would certainly win and the situation in Syria went down the shitter, the Kremlin immediately started frantically checking military readiness, wartime contingency plans and civil defence measures. Putin is apparently having the same reaction Andropov and the other major Soviet leaders had back in the early 1980s, and that reaction is "OH FUCK OH FUCK OH FUCK OH FUCK".
This is not a stable international situation. It'll take one spark, one misinterpreted situation, one rash reaction to set off a conflict that can easily escalate into full-out war and potentially go nuclear. Imagine a situation where it will all decay to such extent that Putin will be forced to decide whether to allow Clinton to attack Russia, with devastating consequences, or pre-empt the attack and actually have a chance to win. What will he do?
 
Last edited:
Guardian G.I. said:
This is not a stable international situation. It'll take one spark, one misinterpreted situation, one rash reaction to set off a conflict that can easily escalate into full-out war and potentially go nuclear. Imagine a situation where it will all decay to such extent that Putin will be forced to decide whether to allow Clinton to attack Russia, with devastating consequences, or pre-empt the attack and actually have a chance to win. What will he do?
Click to expand...

If we follow that logic then why wouldn't trump be as bad or worse? If the world is so fragile then wouldn't trump's tendency to explode be a massive detriment?
 
if lolcows and lolcows only voted it would be a huge clinton landslide. don't be a lolcow this november.

*this message...
 
If you actually believe that Hillary Clinton plans to, wants to, or will engage in war with Russia, you need to lay off the Alex Jones. That is some serious "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" tier conspiracy shit. Breathe into a paper bag if you need to.
 
Beaniebon said:
^I think the media bias towards Clinton is kinda gross and a big part if not the sole reason she's winning.

I wish there was a way to fix that, but the only thing that might help is if government regulations took them down and instead had a non bias, government run news center that releases straight up news (with no talk shows, panels, round the clock coverage, ect. and instead presented the facts and made people come to their own conclusions/feelings on things).

But even then there is no way to get rid of bias. It might be better than party run news networks that host the debates and are the number one source of information that runs all day.
Click to expand...
Here in the UK the bias is very telling, before with Brexit they made sure to give each side time with their point but with Trump they'll have a panel of 'experts' who are all pro Hillary and consider Trump to potentially be the next Hitler, the BBC will occasionally get a Trump supporter but they're typically a divisive person and the interviewer will badger them with loaded question, although occasionally someone like this sneaks in:
 
King n Yellow said:
No armed insurrections but probably some protests, not so much against the election of Hillary but rather against media corps like NYT and CNN. From what I've seen that seems to be where the anger among Trump supporters is starting to channel to.
Click to expand...
Assuming a nuclear World War III is imminent under Crooked Hillary, we would still fair a lot better in a civil war to remove her from office. If Trump loses and commits suicide in shame, he'll be a martyr. We have eighty-eight generals who endorsed him, and Hillary is their number one problem. Consider it the attempted Turkish coup, except successful because our military is superior and nobody likes Crooked Hillary.

Realistically, a revival of the Tea Party is more likely, especially if Republicans lose control of Congress or fail to take action against Hillary, and Obamacare starts showing its true colors. The question is whether it would continue up to the next presidential election, or subside after the midterm elections like it did after 2010. The last candidate we need is another fucking Mitt Romney, especially after WikiLeaks telling us every page of the Democrat Party's election protocols.

Ass Manager 3000 said:
If we follow that logic then why wouldn't trump be as bad or worse? If the world is so fragile then wouldn't trump's tendency to explode be a massive detriment?
Click to expand...
Supporting "freedom fighters" against a world power, who is also against a common enemy, is a clear path to war. Engaging in a Twitter "war" against bullshit at three in the morning and talking about grabbing pussy eleven years ago is not. We didn't learn anything since World War II, and General Patton is indeed "rolling in his grave."
 
Guardian G.I. said:
When Reagan was elected President, his hawkishness really scared the Soviet leadership - they seriously expected him to start WW3, and their expectations were only reinforced by his decision to create SDI (endangering MAD, thus implying he was planning to launch a first strike) and move Pershing II missiles into Western Europe (2-3 minutes from launch till hitting targets in European USSR - it would leave no time for Soviet leadership to react, making decapitation strikes a possibility). Eventually, they interpreted the legend of Able Archer 83 as preparations for a first nuclear strike against the USSR, nearly leading to WW3.
Click to expand...

The fact that Clinton takes a hard line toward Russia, like Reagan did, is hardly an indictment. Reagan was right and when he left office one of our oldest enemies was vastly diminished in power.

Our enemies being pleased by our choice of President would be something to worry about.
 
Wow I don't check this thread for a few hours and there are six more pages.
I actually agree with null on whatever he was saying a few pages ago.
Can anyone tell me who @MikePence is, they don't seem like a new person.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom