MASSIVE Erection Thread 2016 - Lizard has the advantage. Trump is spiraling towards defeat.

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
First title
NEtitle.png


second title
title2.png


third title
US 2016 Presidential election  Trump victory leaves rivals distressed and confused    Kiwi Farms.png


Fourth title
trumptitle4.png


Fifth and Sixth title
new title (1).png


Seventh title
Screenshot_2016-06-07-12-33-22.png


eighth title
Apocalypse 2016.png


Ninth title
Screenshot_2016-07-25-23-47-41~2.jpg


tenth title
title10.png


All discussion of the candidates, updates and results should go here

For example- here's a video of Ted Cruz vying for world domination.


Also Hilary Clinton is a crook and nobody should have sex with her.

Discuss

(Note- The title will change as we get nearer the election, previous titles will be archived in the OP)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I feel like the salt geyser will be much more spectacular if Trump wins. Especially considering that a lot of people that hate him are extremely prone to violent outbursts of triggering to begin with.
It will go down in history as the Great Triggering of 2016. Half of tumblr's userbase will either threaten or commit suicide. I can already hear the cry typing now.
 

Looking into the cases of rape against Bill Clinton. The weird thing is how for many of them the media sources don’t even attempt to give proof for these women existing.

Now current rape shield laws prevent journalists from publishing names and pictures of victims without their permission so because of that you can understand why you wouldn’t find much info about rape victims in local papers reporting crimes like that.

I wouldn’t normally accuse journalists of using this to fabricate stories and justify them giving nameless or anonymous women who apparently they spoke too, claiming they were raped by Bill Clinton and who never came forward with any accusations.

But Roger Stone isn’t really a journalist. And previous statements where he accused Capt. Humayun Khanof being a Muslim Brotherhood Spy without any real evidence, makes anything he claims very questionable. and unless he actually provides more evidence besides just saying,

“I tracked down a woman who was raped by Bill Clinton in 1974 when she was 19. And in order to protect her identity I can’t provide you any evidence on who she is or how I found her.”

Then I’m going to dismiss those accounts that were “discovered" by Roger Stone and Robert Morrow in their book.”

(I also want to point out that Texas State Politician Robert Morrow who co-wrote the book that “found” dozens of anonymous women who had been raped by Bill Clinton for some reason is wearing a Jester hat in the majority of images I find of him online and just seems like a very bizarre person in general, doing things like pulling out a baby pacifiers with a picture of the Trump Logo on it and sucking it during an interview. Not to use that to discredit his claims, just something I felt like needed to be pointed out.)

Another thing that needs to be said is that Bill Clinton isn’t the only President to have been accused of crimes like this. Literally every single President in the past few decades has had multiple people come forward claiming to be victims of a rape or sexual assault perpetrated by the President after that person is elected.

I’m not trying to say these events didn’t happen or the women accusing President Clinton of rape are lying or mentally ill. But all I’m saying is the evidence against President Clinton is as good as the evidence for these other events happening that I described above.

There's also this

QvWNpHO.jpg
 

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/15/us/politics/colin-powell-emails-hack-donald-trump.html

In several emails, Mr. Powell suggested that speaking out against Mr. Trump would only add to the attention the Republican nominee was getting from the news media. Responding to a reporter asking for comment, Mr. Powell wrote last month that Mr. Trump is “his own best enemy” and added: “I will speak out when I feel it appropriate and not after every idiot thing he says.”

But the emails make clear that Mr. Powell, who also served as the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has no intention of supporting Mr. Trump. In one back-and-forth with a former aide, Mr. Powell insisted that Mr. Trump should not be elected president.

No need to debate it with you now, but Trump is a national disgrace and an international pariah,” Mr. Powell wrote in June, noting the criticism of Mr. Trump by several prominent conservatives. “He is in the process of destroying himself, no need for Dems to attack him.”

IMG_20160917_030237.jpg


Ben "Montana Merchant Mangler" Garrison does it again.

Same guy who made this when they started trolling him?

93IqBpa.jpg
 
I feel like the salt geyser will be much more spectacular if Trump wins. Especially considering that a lot of people that hate him are extremely prone to violent outbursts of triggering to begin with.

I'd say a Trump loss would see plenty of sperging too. It would be different (wailing about the death of America and imminent Islamic takeover instead of death camps and legalizing rape and slavery) but more or less the same intensity. Don't forget how after the 2008 election the Teabaggers appeared, and I don't think the right hated Obama half as much as they do Clinton. If she wins you'll have salt enough to last for years.
 
If the Democrats lose this election the fault will lie largely with smug hipster fucks like this idiot who spent the entire election sneering at American voters and insulting them.
And Hillary's disconnect with the average voter. She really doesn't connect well with the average voter
This a million times over, maybe a good hard ass kicking from one of the most flawed republican candidates to ever run will cause them to do some soul searching. Somehow I doubt it.
I doubt it. The Republicans suffered some pretty bad defeats in 2008 and 2012 but still refuse to change their tactics. Trump was not in their plan.
 

Even more conspiracy theories for this election cycle. The most fun ones are the conspiracy theorists that direct you to their source material and tell you to analyze the content yourself.

The phone camera displays look strange to me, no one seems even to try to record Hillary, it appears Hillary doesn't block the shot for someone who appears to be just a few feet in front of the phone, and the images on their phones look nothing like the stage completely backdropped by a huge, vertically-hung American flag.

What exactly are their phones pointing at, if not the stage, or the presidential candidate herself? It really doesn't look like the weird crowd of people holding up Hillary signs that she passes by either.

xPVubDz.png


The brown haired, black suit, white shirt guy is clearly captured by this guy's phone but Hillary directly behind him seems to avoid the frame completely? It's at 46 seconds of the original Hillary video.
 
Last edited:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=nCP3HIhQgLI
Even more conspiracy theories for this election cycle. The most fun ones are the conspiracy theorists that direct you to their source material and tell you to analyze the content yourself.

The phone camera displays look strange to me, no one seems even to try to record Hillary, it appears Hillary doesn't block the shot for someone who appears to be just a few feet in front of the phone, and the images on their phones look nothing like the stage completely backdropped by a huge, vertically-hung American flag.

What exactly are their phones pointing at, if not the stage, or the presidential candidate herself? It really doesn't look like the weird crowd of people holding up Hillary signs that she passes by either.

xPVubDz.png


The brown haired, black suit, white shirt guy is clearly captured by this guy's phone but Hillary directly behind him seems to avoid the frame completely? It's at 46 seconds of the original Hillary video.
I'm unsure what you/the video is trying to get at. Do you think the crowd is fake and edited in? But they get that guy's shoulder in that screencap you posted. Do you think Hillary's edited in or something? Then why would the crowd be filming?

If they were going to fake the rally, why not have her there while they filmed it?
 
Last edited:
I'm unsure what you/the video is trying to get at. Do you think the crowd is fake and edited in? But they get that guy's shoulder in that screencap you posted. Do you think Hillary's edited in or something? Then why would the crowd be filming?

Some commenters think the crowd is from another rally, and it's superimposed ontop of the stage. In any case, the images on the phones don't appear to show Hillary herself or the stage.

It's more pointing out an oddity than making any definite conspiratorial claims.
 
Some commenters think the crowd is from another rally, and it's superimposed ontop of the stage. In any case, the images on the phones don't appear to show Hillary herself or the stage.

It's more pointing out an oddity than making any definite conspiratorial claims.
That's so fucking extra lmao but I could see it being done if she was too unwell or worried about passing out in public again. But why go through such lengths (super imposing a crowd like that is not easy) instead of getting a bunch of interns and shit and filming a fake one?
 
That's so fucking extra lmao but I could see it being done if she was too unwell or worried about passing out in public again. But why go through such lengths (super imposing a crowd like that is not easy) instead of getting a bunch of interns and shit and filming a fake one?

Yeah there must be enough liberals in the US to make a fake rally or ten before a blue screen.
 
Yeah there must be enough liberals in the US to make a fake rally or ten before a blue screen.
The only way I could see it is if only a select few people know and she wants to keep that circle very small, so hiring actors isn't an option due to it being leaked. However, even then video editing at that level isn't a task one person could do at last minute if she was feeling unwell. And to go through so a meticulous process but missing things like Clinton waving at the wall instead of at the crowd... And if you subscribe to the theory that she's mentally unwell, it would make sense for her to do so.

I'd have to see more proof before buying into her being photo (video?) shopped into old rally footage.
 
Last edited:
And to go through so a meticulous process but missing things like Clinton waving at the wall instead of at the crowd

I forgot about that bit, if the video is unedited, who the hell is she waving and pointing directly to behind the stage?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom