wtfNeedSignUp
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
That's always been the thing for comic book films, and usually it was justified because no one thought they'd have more than few installments, so villain variety is important and people like a good karmic death. Ironically in the case of Kang people say that he's not a threat because he lost to a D tier hero. It also doesn't help that Marvel already had very lackluster villains compared to DC, you have at most 1-2 big villains for any hero unless it's Spiderman/Mutants.I think the writers just cannot see the value in a recurring villain, or at least one that isn't unceremoniously killed in his first appearance. They probably think it's a failure whenever the good guys don't completely and totally win over the bad guys, because evil is something that must always be extinguished completely or else you're complicit.