- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Does he have enough cash to live off of?
That's his problem, isn't it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does he have enough cash to live off of?
"Mark...Please see me in my office."
View attachment 452859
And that shows the core problem with the SJW's and to a larger extent with the far left. They always seize the benefit to them in these new things. The new information age. The ability to communicate. But somehow they seem completely and permanently blind to ever thinking through that the same things that benefit them, such as the ability to meet and communicate with other fellow traveleres, thus increasing your small inconsequential pack on lunatics into a robust angry mob, can also be used to equal or greater effect by those that disagree with them. Yes the internet allowed the SJW's to find each other. It also allowed those sick of all the PC and SJW nonsense to realize that they are not alone, and are actually in the majority.
Does he have enough cash to live off of? Because I don't really see any other big name comic studio taking him in now, and he would absolutely refuse anything smaller.
I am just wondering if we are going to see mad rush to find another job accompanied by DFE, followed by a rapid decline in mental health as his funds run out and he returns to Mother Dearest's LOVING arms? Or will he instead hunker down, withdraw from the net, and reemerge later in another form, bankrolled by his savings?That's his problem, isn't it?
those are the eyes of a man who would sue a preschool for copyright infringement. And win.
I see another Chris Ryall situation happening. Chris Ryall was the CCO and EiC of IDW, he protected Aubrey Sitterson (another exceptional individual) from getting fired for creating a PR nightmare and pissing off the GI Joe fandom with his insertion of SOCIALIST ideals into the Joe Universe. Didn’t help that he already had low sales as well. Chris Ryall was ordered by superiors to fire Aubrey, instead he planned to have Aubrey work under a pseudonym on another project. Ryall going against orders was fired.Rumor since the EiC change is the new EiC hates a Waid and would really wants him gone. But the long time AEiC (and high ranking SJW asshole at Marvel) Tom Brevoort is Waid’s friend and protector. With Brevoort being himself protected by prior EiC and C suite executive Joe Quesada.
How to piss off the Mouse when working for a Disney subsidiary,
Step one; get noticed by the Mouse for public antics
There is no step 2.
I see another Chris Ryall situation happening. Chris Ryall was the CCO and EiC of IDW, he protected Aubrey Sitterson (another exceptional individual) from getting fired for creating a PR nightmare and pissing off the GI Joe fandom with his insertion of SOCIALIST ideals into the Joe Universe.
I see another Chris Ryall situation happening. Chris Ryall was the CCO and EiC of IDW, he protected Aubrey Sitterson (another exceptional individual) from getting fired for creating a PR nightmare and pissing off the GI Joe fandom with his insertion of SOCIALIST ideals into the Joe Universe. Didn’t help that he already had low sales as well. Chris Ryall was ordered by superiors to fire Aubrey, instead he planned to have Aubrey work under a pseudonym on another project. Ryall going against orders was fired.
I have no clue why he decided to protectAubrey at the cost of his job, other than the possibility that they are gay lovers or something.
Not just that, he turned it into gay porn, too.
No, really.
I have a feeling Hasbro is going to cut them off for this one.
Not just that, he turned it into gay porn, too.
No, really.
I have a feeling Hasbro is going to cut them off for this one.
The funniest thing about it was that Aubrey was also ordered to keep quiet, management wanted to let it blow over. (Shockingly) He didn’t take their advise and made a huge stink. Also didn’t help that he had pissed off not just the Joe Fandom but also normies and the CG-spergs and they weren’t going to let it go that easy.Nope, it’s just that they are SJW’s. Nobody ever holds them accountable for anything thus they have never suffered any actual consequences for their bullshit. Now that it is finally happening they don’t know how to deal with it. Remember they still have no mental concept of consequences. Thus simp,y hiding Sitterson under a fake name seemed a perfectly valid option to Ryall. After all nobody could possibly be serious about consequences of actions. “Everything will be fine once the attention dies down. “ Unfortunately for them Hasbro is not a woke company of SJW clueless creatives.
I will never understand people catering to SJWs. There's absolutely no loyalty among them. They turn on each other faster than anything if it will allow them to rise to the top of the totem pole or get them 15 more minutes of attention. Any back patting Waid may feel like he's getting will crumble the moment one person has a complaint against him - and it will happen, it always does.
That was a Gay Pride Cover they made. Gay people found it offensively fetishized. And these were normal gay people not the SJW nutcases.Not just that, he turned it into gay porn, too.
No, really.
I have a feeling Hasbro is going to cut them off for this one.
As far as I know they’re keeping both the Transformers and GI Joe licenses. They’re getting rid of the shared universe from what I’ve heard.IDW currently has a massive story arc that ends their long running Transformers shared universe by mid summer. Their Hasbro contract expires in the fall. You may come to your own conclusions from that.
The funniest thing about it was that Aubrey was also ordered to keep quiet, management wanted to let it blow over. (Shockingly) He didn’t take their advise and made a huge stink. Also didn’t help that he had pissed off not just the Joe Fandom but also normies and the CG-spergs and they weren’t going to let it go that easy.
Dear Black Jesus, please let history repeat itself. Have Waid take Brevoort with him.Yep! Management immediately ordered him to shut up, keep the fuck off social media and do nothing to promote anything. Just disappear. He instantly disregarded this and did an interview with Bleeding Cool that made everything much worse.
You can be forgiven for not seeing the Waid connection. But it really is amazing how they all have no ability to learn. On Friday Waid got hauled into EiC Cebulski’s office and ordered to shut down and sterilize all social media, go silent, to do nothing in public to make things worse. By late a Saturday he had spoken to Bleeding Cool and they had an article up that made things much much worse.
Because this creates a false sense of 'Personal Army' syndrome. Waid thought he was immune because he was this 'big name' and had all these little idols looking up to him. The second he is in legal hot water and out on his ass, they won't lift a finger for him, because he's a fat, old, bald, straight white male. He'll cry and whimper and create a laughable crowd-funding campaign that will fail because he isn't a 19 year old dangerhair camwhore thot with tits. Of course, they'll shower him with messages of 'support' (IE: useless tweets that won't actually do anything) and never act on his behalf while he'll be forced to face the consequences of his actions alone.
These type of people always overestimate the amount of support they have and the second reality delivers them a backhand so hard it knocks their teeth out, they look for their army and find out people on the internet don't actually give a fuck about you and you're left all alone.
Not to mention you were brought down by a man who refused to use a camera and a microphone and constantly coughed into the mic. He outsold your entire fucking company except for a handful of titles. That is the most pathetic fucking shit I have ever heard. And now its likely heard by the fucking CEO because you opened your company up to one of the only laws that can fuck you over.
They fundamentally do not believe in escapism
Is everybody in the comic book industry a walking, living PR nightmare?Forgot to include what Aubrey did that created a PR nightmare
It's not just this stuff. It's also referring to cases as arising under Title 15. I do a lot work with statutes in Title 15, like Truth in Lending Act and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. I have never heard of cases arising under the multiple statutes in Title 15, including the Sherman, Clayton, and Robinson-Patman acts as well as the Federal Trade Commission Act and the various statutes making up the Consumer Credit Protection Act all lumped together as Title 15 cases.whats "off"? If its the ideological part, anytime a disputed legal question occurs the lawyers involved are inherently ideological. Every major precedent is based on theory and not concrete law. Hell, the idea that the courts have the right of judicial review is the result of an ideological dispute between the Federalists and the Democrats. Drives the strict constructionists nuts though.