💊 Manosphere manhood101.com - The Cuck Academy

[JU 199]

@Reeheee2 why doesn't the professor come here and say that himself?

 

[melty]

you are a bunch of retards and don't use the merely pretending excuse, michischaub clearly and logically laid out why you are wrong about the professor being charles gellman and filled in the holes I was missing, if you read his initial post and still think it's gellman you are really dumb

lol who cares, you can always tell when people get correctly doxxed because they chimp out over it for no reason and go to great lengths to prove they're totally not that person. If someone doxxed me and it was wrong you know what I would do? Just go with it so they'd stop looking for my real dox, dumbshits

 

[ChuckSlaughter]

I give up do whatever guys.

 

[Bungleboy]

you are a bunch of retards and don't use the merely pretending excuse, michischaub clearly and logically laid out why you are wrong about the professor being charles gellman and filled in the holes I was missing, if you read his initial post and still think it's gellman you are really dumb

 

[It's HK-47]

lol who cares, you can always tell when people get correctly doxxed because they chimp out over it for no reason and go to great lengths to prove they're totally not that person. If someone doxxed me and it was wrong you know what I would do? Just go with it so they'd stop looking for my real dox, dumbshits

Precisely. What's the most telling for me is that if Nikolai Hajrondan is supposed to be the "lightning rod" to draw attention away from who the Professor actually is, why is absolutely no effort being expended to pin it onto Nikolai? Why the endless, vested interest in diverting attention away from Charles if there is already such a conveniently-placed target?

Nikolai is utterly and completely ignored by every single sock puppet that passes through here. There's no mention of him and no interest in him even though he's directly tied into all of this nonsense in a much more obvious way. Instead, every puppet that wanders our way bee-lines for Charles Gellman. In my eyes that's an incredibly dubious, suspicious circumstance.

 

[AnOminous]

you are a bunch of retards and don't use the merely pretending excuse, michischaub clearly and logically laid out why you are wrong about the professor being charles gellman and filled in the holes I was missing, if you read his initial post and still think it's gellman you are really dumb

So why do you care if we wreck his shit then?

 

[JU 199]

Something else- _____ was reading the forum while the debate was happening. Everyone was calling him _____, why didn't he mention it?

 

[AP 297]

you are a bunch of retards and don't use the merely pretending excuse, michischaub clearly and logically laid out why you are wrong about the professor being charles gellman and filled in the holes I was missing, if you read his initial post and still think it's gellman you are really dumb

Did you also pay 21 dollars a month to learn how to put on a condom?

 

[Reeheee2]

So why do you care if we wreck his shit then?

I don't care, but you are only wrecking yourselves at the moment because of how stupid you are, you can't follow basic logic and keep spamming "he must be charles cause he was mad". He was probably a little pissed because you are trying to doxx him, but he saw you as social retards, you all fumbled and mumbled and didn't make a single coherent point

it was cringe worthy to listen to, especially considering how tough you all type

I would like it if you doxxed him for real, because I think unless he has a legitimate reason for anonymity, he should stand behind his words and reveal his identity like he always encourages others to do.

 

[Cave]

I don't care, but you are only wrecking yourselves at the moment because of how stupid you are, you can't follow basic logic and keep spamming "he must be charles cause he was mad". He was probably a little pissed because you are trying to doxx him, but he saw you as social retards, you all fumbled and mumbled and didn't make a single coherent point

it was cringe worthy to listen to, especially considering how tough you all type

I would like it if you doxxed him for real, because I think unless he has a legitimate reason for anonymity, he should stand behind his words and reveal his identity like he always encourages others to do.

Would you like to reveal your identity?

 

[AP 297]

I don't care, but you are only wrecking yourselves at the moment because of how stupid you are, you can't follow basic logic and keep spamming "he must be charles cause he was mad". He was probably a little pissed because you are trying to doxx him, but he saw you as social retards, you all fumbled and mumbled and didn't make a single coherent point

it was cringe worthy to listen to, especially considering how tough you all type

I would like it if you doxxed him for real, because I think unless he has a legitimate reason for anonymity, he should stand behind his words and reveal his identity like he always encourages others to do.

So can you tell me what you learned at manhood101? How did it improve your life?

Do you feel your $21 dollars a month was well spent? If so why?

 

[JU 199]

Would you like to reveal your identity?

@Reeheee2 would you care to show us your dick also?

 

[AnOminous]

I don't care, but you are only wrecking yourselves at the moment

How? Nobody cares what we look like.

We're also not the ones who are going to have to explain our extracurricular activities to Wolters Kluwer, lol.

 

[*Asterisk*]

I don't care, but you are only wrecking yourselves at the moment because of how stupid you are, you can't follow basic logic and keep spamming "he must be charles cause he was mad". He was probably a little pissed because you are trying to doxx him, but he saw you as social retards, you all fumbled and mumbled and didn't make a single coherent point

it was cringe worthy to listen to, especially considering how tough you all type

I would like it if you doxxed him for real, because I think unless he has a legitimate reason for anonymity, he should stand behind his words and reveal his identity like he always encourages others to do.

I can do the next debate if you like. Trust me, I'm much more offensive in person.

 

[It's HK-47]

I don't care, but you are only wrecking yourselves at the moment because of how stupid you are, you can't follow basic logic and keep spamming "he must be charles cause he was mad". He was probably a little pissed because you are trying to doxx him, but he saw you as social retards, you all fumbled and mumbled and didn't make a single coherent point

it was cringe worthy to listen to, especially considering how tough you all type

I would like it if you doxxed him for real, because I think unless he has a legitimate reason for anonymity, he should stand behind his words and reveal his identity like he always encourages others to do.

Allow me to illuminate some of the basic logic that's involved here, as to why we've come to the conclusions we have, and why everyone who rushes to the defense of Manhood101: The Great Condom-Wearing Caper is ultimately missing a few fairly important c̶h̶r̶o̶m̶o̶s̶o̶m̶e̶s̶ points.

1. If he was indeed not Charles Gellman, the appearance of so many sock puppets, "students" and deletion of vast swathes of content was an incredibly well-timed coincidence.
2. We have not seen The Professor on this forum since the mention of that name. All activity promptly ceased on his part, where-as prior to this he was a nigh-constant presence. This is a bit odd considering that we're essentially his largest promoters at present. Very rude, Gellman.
3. The Professor has shown little to no courtesy whatsoever towards others in any way, shape or form. Not even his paying student body. The fact that he'd be recoiling to "defend an innocent man" that he's never met or interacted with or even related to is frankly laughable given his track record.
4. If The Professor indeed was so interested in defending an allegedly uninvolved party, why has not a single effort been made on his part, directly, without the use of socks or "students" or indeed on his own forum been made?
   
5. If indeed we did have the wrong person, this would be an incredibly powerful tool against us, for reasons The Professor in his infinite wisdom and brilliance ought to be able to understand. As it is, he's not playing that card properly, and there's no reason to keep that one hidden unless we've hit the mark.
   
6. Lastly, anyone who considers that exceptional display of prepubescent chimping, cajoling and screeching as anything but immediately forfeits all rights to conduct an intelligent argument or be taken seriously.

 

[Overchek]

@Reeheee2 @michischaub @Real_student
lol why do yall need manhood lessons

 

[Adamska]

How do you explain that the video Jtheripper was referring to when talking about Charles isn't the same made by Charles gelmann? And if he was so nervous regarding you finding his identity, how come he posted your finding on his own forum for public to see?

How come he had to delete 20% of his forum and why are you and literally every other dick rider coming to try and disabuse us of this notion? Why the titanic chimpout after that name came up?

Precisely. What's the most telling for me is that if Nikolai Hajrondan is supposed to be the "lightning rod" to draw attention away from who the Professor actually is, why is absolutely no effort being expended to pin it onto Nikolai? Why the endless, vested interest in diverting attention away from Charles if there is already such a conveniently-placed target?

Nikolai is utterly and completely ignored by every single sock puppet that passes through here. There's no mention of him and no interest in him even though he's directly tied into all of this nonsense in a much more obvious way. Instead, every puppet that wanders our way bee-lines for Charles Gellman. In my eyes that's an incredibly dubious, suspicious circumstance.

Uhh...

Charles Gellman looks different to this picture of the professor, maybe you have the wrong guy

They did. It was one of the tactics at least one of them tried to use for this after an initial set of chimp-outs.

You know, that Charles is one hell of a eunuch for lacking the balls to come to his own defense. I think he needs manhood lessons too.

 

[HickoryDickory]

Why are you so obsessed with social competence? "Competence" implies you're ok.
Like that means by definition most people are socially competent and don't need to spend $21/mo it's like not special.

Ya. If they were smart they could learn that and more while getting paid full-time hours. Like I did. (Note that learning and implementing are two different things)

@SunLightStreak, there are other players in the game, so maybe some special attention could be paid to Honky and Butters. If doxxed, maybe we could unravel a bit of this tangled web.

 

[Reeheee2]

Look, you morons could have said YES I CONSENT TO BE RECORDED. That's all you fucking had to say but you were all spazzing out like retards. Then when some of you did try to make points, it sounded like the babblings you'd hear in a lunatic asylum. You love call others autisitic but I've talked with real autistic people and they sound smarter than you lot here did. I take back what I said about doxxing him for real, I don't think you guys are capable, you will trip over at the first hurdle and keep embarrassing yourselves.

 

[It's HK-47]

Look, you morons could have said YES I CONSENT TO BE RECORDED. That's all you fucking had to say but you were all spazzing out like retards. Then when some of you did try to make points, it sounded like the babblings you'd hear in a lunatic asylum. You love call others autisitic but I've talked with real autistic people and they sound smarter than you lot here did. I take back what I said about doxxing him for real, I don't think you guys are capable, you will trip over at the first hurdle and keep embarrassing yourselves.