💊 Manosphere manhood101.com - The Cuck Academy

  • Thread starter Thread starter HG 400
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Look, you morons could have said YES I CONSENT TO BE RECORDED. That's all you fucking had to say but you were all spazzing out like retards. Then when some of you did try to make points, it sounded like the babblings you'd hear in a lunatic asylum. You love call others autisitic but I've talked with real autistic people and they sound smarter than you lot here did. I take back what I said about doxxing him for real, I don't think you guys are capable, you will trip over at the first hurdle and keep embarrassing yourselves.

Do you take manhood lessons because your penis is like an acorn glued to the bottom of your torso?
 
Look, you morons could have said YES I CONSENT TO BE RECORDED. That's all you fucking had to say but you were all spazzing out like retards. Then when some of you did try to make points, it sounded like the babblings you'd hear in a lunatic asylum. You love call others autisitic but I've talked with real autistic people and they sound smarter than you lot here did. I take back what I said about doxxing him for real, I don't think you guys are capable, you will trip over at the first hurdle and keep embarrassing yourselves.
You heard it retards, we have a challenge! :)
 
Look, you morons could have said YES I CONSENT TO BE RECORDED. That's all you fucking had to say but you were all spazzing out like retards. Then when some of you did try to make points, it sounded like the babblings you'd hear in a lunatic asylum. You love call others autisitic but I've talked with real autistic people and they sound smarter than you lot here did. I take back what I said about doxxing him for real, I don't think you guys are capable, you will trip over at the first hurdle and keep embarrassing yourselves.
You and your moronic buddies just don't understand that nobody who was on that call was really interested in seriously debating you or his most revered Professorship.
 
Look, you morons could have said YES I CONSENT TO BE RECORDED. That's all you fucking had to say but you were all spazzing out like retards. Then when some of you did try to make points, it sounded like the babblings you'd hear in a lunatic asylum. You love call others autisitic but I've talked with real autistic people and they sound smarter than you lot here did. I take back what I said about doxxing him for real, I don't think you guys are capable, you will trip over at the first hurdle and keep embarrassing yourselves.


Lol calm down
 
Look, you morons could have said YES I CONSENT TO BE RECORDED. That's all you fucking had to say but you were all spazzing out like retards. Then when some of you did try to make points, it sounded like the babblings you'd hear in a lunatic asylum. You love call others autisitic but I've talked with real autistic people and they sound smarter than you lot here did. I take back what I said about doxxing him for real, I don't think you guys are capable, you will trip over at the first hurdle and keep embarrassing yourselves.
We did, you retards shouted over us giving it due to being cowards, I even gave a link to it at the bottom to laugh at you.

Also, to get back on track to avoid a runaround, Charles Paul Gellman of Manhood Academy, Manhood101, Chick Academy, and who works at Wolters Kluwen in California leads a cult and has a failed marriage. He cannot be arsed to defend himself, and sends people who will never graduate since it's a cult, to do damage control.

Charles Paul Gellman is a eunuch, coward. His scam is hilarious since his own wife hates and cheats on him, meaning you will never get a girl to fuck you without paying for it. He is overshadowed by everyone else in his family, and will never have that creative spark to break past mid-level suboordinate marketing.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Look, you morons could have said YES I CONSENT TO BE RECORDED. That's all you fucking had to say but you were all spazzing out like retards. Then when some of you did try to make points, it sounded like the babblings you'd hear in a lunatic asylum. You love call others autisitic but I've talked with real autistic people and they sound smarter than you lot here did. I take back what I said about doxxing him for real, I don't think you guys are capable, you will trip over at the first hurdle and keep embarrassing yourselves.

You know, that $21 could have gone towards viagra. It's a much simpler solution to your problem
 
You know, that Charles is one hell of a eunuch for lacking the balls to come to his own defense. I think he needs manhood lessons too.

Maybe he should actually rename it Cuck Academy and give lessons in how to be a giant, gaping pussy, since he actually knows that subject pretty well.
 
YES I CONSENT TO BE RECORDED.

Yawning sneasel did, your exceptional master talked over it.

@Reeheee2 Why would we care about making points in a 'debate' where-

1) There was no topic
2) No real rules
3) No time frame
4) A bought moderator.

That chatroom was about giving the prof's deflated ego a boost.

btw you must post your dick pics to continue
 
I think you overestimate how much we care about whether or not we got the dox wrong. You're in the wrong place if you think that's going to shut anyone up. The only way to get us to care is to show us your dick tbh.
 
Allow me to illuminate some of the basic logic that's involved here, as to why we've come to the conclusions we have, and why everyone who rushes to the defense of Manhood101: The Great Condom-Wearing Caper is ultimately missing a few fairly important c̶h̶r̶o̶m̶o̶s̶o̶m̶e̶s̶ points.
  1. If he was indeed not Charles Gellman, the appearance of so many sock puppets, "students" and deletion of vast swathes of content was an incredibly well-timed coincidence.
  2. We have not seen The Professor on this forum since the mention of that name. All activity promptly ceased on his part, where-as prior to this he was a nigh-constant presence. This is a bit odd considering that we're essentially his largest promoters at present. Very rude, Gellman.
  3. The Professor has shown little to no courtesy whatsoever towards others in any way, shape or form. Not even his paying student body. The fact that he'd be recoiling to "defend an innocent man" is frankly laughable.
  4. If The Professor indeed was so interested in defending an allegedly uninvolved party, why has not a single effort been made on his part, directly, without the use of socks or "students" or indeed on his own forum been made?
  5. If indeed we did have the wrong person, this would be an incredibly powerful tool against us, for reasons The Professor in his infinite wisdom and brilliance ought to be able to understand. As it is, he's not playing that card properly, and there's no reason to keep that one hidden unless we've hit the mark.
  6. Lastly, anyone who considers that exceptional display of prepubescent chimping, cajoling and screeching as anything but immediately forfeits all rights to conduct an intelligent argument or be taken seriously.

My stance has been that Charles Gellman is involved in this somehow. We have enough evidence of that. Sugoi and Yawning's research is something I trust, too.

To me this is like a game of battleship. We have several ships(people and parties involved) in play and we just had a coordinate(powerword) make a direct hit in something that had them clearly spooked. We may not sink the battleship by using Charles Gellman's name, but we damn sure hit something.

1.) We have had no confirmation from staff that all these guys are socks. They might be students though. I suggest we report them all and have staff do IP checks.

2.) Very true and a clear indication that something was hit.

3.) and 4.) Damn right. I would not put it past him to sink someone else unless they might dox him in return.

5.) See hit something and he is sensitive about it.

6.) Clearly Carnegie's Win Friends and Influence People was not a part of the curriculum.
 
Then when some of you did try to make points, it sounded like the babblings you'd hear in a lunatic asylum. You love call others autisitic but I've talked with real autistic people and they sound smarter than you lot here did.
you know if all you hear when someone is talking is babbling noses maybe you should learn to listen or get hearing aids grandpa
speaking of which is the call up somewhere im kinda curious about it but i dont trust manhood101s version of it
 
My stance has been that Charles Gellman is involved in this somehow. We have enough evidence of that. Sugoi and Yawning's research is something I trust, too.

To me this is like a game of battleship. We have several ships(people and parties involved) in play and we just had a coordinate(powerword) make a direct hit in something that had them clearly spooked. We may not sink the battleship by using Charles Gellman's name, but we damn sure hit something.

1.) We have had no confirmation from staff that all these guys are socks. They might be students though. I suggest we report them all and have staff do IP checks.

2.) Very true and a clear indication that something was hit.

3.) and 4.) Damn right. I would not put it past him to sink someone else unless they might dox him in return.

5.) See hit something and he is sensitive about it.

6.) Clearly Carnegie's Win Friends and Influence People was not a part of the curriculum.
The way I see it is that we got it wrong on Gellman=Manhood101.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[...]Btw, watching that other doc, anyone else notice that teardrop tattoo? Isn't that what they give guys in the slammer who are passed around as currency?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teardrop_tattoo

"The teardrop tattoo or tear tattoo is a symbolic tattoo of a tear that is placed underneath the eye. The tattoo can have various meanings: it can signify that the wearer has killed someone[1] or has spent time in prison;[2] that the wearer was raped while incarcerated[3][4] or it can acknowledge the loss of a family or fellow gang member. Sometimes, only the wearer will know the exact meaning of the tattoo.[4][5]"
 
I still think ______ is behind manhood101 somehow. The professor might be multiple people but he is one of them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Okay @Reeheee2, you seem a little worked up there. Why don't we all kick back, crack a beer, pack a bowl, and talk like civilized people?
Now champ, we get why you're a little buttflustered; we really do. Professor Cuck is upset about the doxxing and not being taken seriously, you're upset because people are laughing at you, it's all a bit crazy. But this shit right here? This thing where you guys come in all angry and yelling about what bastards we are? This ain't helping you maintain that whole "I ain't even mad" image you're trying to cultivate.
Now take a deep breath, and try again?
 
I still think Gellman is behing manhood101 somehow. The professor might be multiple people but he is one of them.
Seriously, the reaction and chimpout from all these tards for another 30 pages, and them desperately trying to deflect us from the notion of Charles Gellman = The Professor is still damning in my opinion. Extremely so in fact.
 
Back
Top Bottom