💊 Manosphere manhood101.com - The Cuck Academy

  • Thread starter Thread starter HG 400
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
sugoi-chan said:
Yesterday or the day before, I linked to a post where an ex-user called the site a cult. Thinking about it and looking at the forums, I think this might actually be true.

See this thread, for example: http://manhood101.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&p=91607&sid=5d9e1f83ca8c9077bc52b8ba0b676c0e#p91607

Every single one of Professor's posts ends with an image (or more) which reminds the reader what site they're on. That's one of the things cult leaders do to inculcate the cult's mentality into you: remind you of where you are, why you're there, and the value of being in versus out. And then there's the way that ex-members or members who cut themselves off from the collective are punished: their name is changed, their avatar is changed into that of the crying baby, their posts are edited.

There's also a huge emphasis on "I can teach you the ways to fix your life...provided you pay me money." I know the site offers "scholarships", but even Scientology offers free tests and content in order to draw hopeless, depressed people into the fold.
Click to expand...

Definitely reeks of similarity to Scientology-style cultism, from the few topics I've been able to read over there and your descriptions of the ones I've missed.
For the "Professor" (Obviously wants to feel special about himself, likely because he failed to get any actual meaningful qualifications) it definitely seems to be about control of his herd/flock/sycophants through a carrot/stick mentality leading heavily towards the stick.
This suggests he has almost zero control in his own life and tries to minimise the recognition of that by controlling others, which further shows through in his thoughts about relationships. Some of which are frankly quite disturbing- the number of incidences where he seems to be advocating extreme physical abuse to the point of leaving clear bruising and damage is quite high, often linked to apparently minor shit in the "relationship" ideal that he concocted in his head.
That and his attempt at drawing people into debates seems more like a (poor) attempt at morale boosting for him and his cult- if he somehow "defeats" people in yelling and insulting people "debate" and proves his primacy/superiority/giant testicles he hopes his little fanboys/brainwashed muppets will be more inclined to follow him and believe his every word. Nevermind the fact he actually appears to have no idea of how a debate actually works, or that he seems to be on the losing end of any actual debate. As people have postulated before, he only wants to do it "Live" so he can essentially steamroll the opponent with yelling, heckling and abusive language- he's basically that scared of letting the other people get their logical, well thought out arguments in that he utterly refuses to let them, hence the seemingly psychotic aversion to text-based debates or discussion.

I wonder what level wizard he is..
 
BraveryBehindKeyboard said:
Keyboard warrior claim: it's a money making scam!! We caught them!!!

Oh wait...

LOL! and now we know the real reason these cowards refuse to live debate. They don't want to get caught looking like fucking morons as usual.
Click to expand...
Buddy, what was the point of making another account? Isn't going through the captcha once torture enough?
 
ActualKiwi said:
Definitely reeks of similarity to Scientology-style cultism, from the few topics I've been able to read over there and your descriptions of the ones I've missed.
For the "Professor" (Obviously wants to feel special about himself, likely because he failed to get any actual meaningful qualifications) it definitely seems to be about control of his herd/flock/sycophants through a carrot/stick mentality leading heavily towards the stick.
This suggests he has almost zero control in his own life and tries to minimise the recognition of that by controlling others, which further shows through in his thoughts about relationships. Some of which are frankly quite disturbing- the number of incidences where he seems to be advocating extreme physical abuse to the point of leaving clear bruising and damage is quite high, often linked to apparently minor shit in the "relationship" ideal that he concocted in his head.
That and his attempt at drawing people into debates seems more like a (poor) attempt at morale boosting for him and his cult- if he somehow "defeats" people in yelling and insulting people "debate" and proves his primacy/superiority/giant testicles he hopes his little fanboys/brainwashed muppets will be more inclined to follow him and believe his every word. Nevermind the fact he actually appears to have no idea of how a debate actually works, or that he seems to be on the losing end of any actual debate. As people have postulated before, he only wants to do it "Live" so he can essentially steamroll the opponent with yelling, heckling and abusive language- he's basically that scared of letting the other people get their logical, well thought out arguments in that he utterly refuses to let them, hence the seemingly psychotic aversion to text-based debates or discussion.

I wonder what level wizard he is..
Click to expand...
I figure it would be like the Jim Sterling vs. Digital Homicide "debate".

We have to remember that the " student body" for this fake academy isn't that bright, or just clutching on to anything out of desperation.
 
HickoryDickory said:
This one is my favorite.
0jHtPMi.jpg
It's just so blatant and clickbaity. The blue and orange that's been a big fad with movie posters the past few years, "Get the facts" slogan like those anti-smoking ads, and the before and after style pics that are used in meth ads.

All he's missing are some flashing blinkies.
Click to expand...

Fairly certain the first woman is Christina Hendricks, aka Joan from Mad Men. She's admitted it interviews in the past to being a feminist.
 
It took me just a few seconds but his website is registered with the name "Nicolai Hajrondan."

I want to the know the fucking answers to this video, @manhood101.com. It seems like you might be hiding something from us.


Archived proof:

https://archive.is/xH80R

I've also looked into some of your past and you seem like one of the biggest pussies of the Manosphere and too chickenshit to come up against the likes of me.

@manhood101.com, why didn't you want to debate this guy?


Yeah, that's right bitch. I'm calling you out on your cowardly bullshit and if you're man enough, you'd cut out the silly copy and paste games that you're playing. I want to see how much of a real man you are. I bet I can find more dirt on your ass while I'm at it. You can block me all you want but it's all out there for everyone to see.
 
Last edited:
Are you telling us that an overly aggressive asshole who tries to be dominant over all women and assert his authority is, in fact, a fucking pussy and a laughingstock?

Color me surprised.
 
So @manhood101's caliber of debate is exactly what he's been doing here: insults, rage. I'm so shocked by this twist.

Good find @dollarhuviya. We should put his powerword in the thread title.
 
Hey @manhood101.com, why are you such a sick fuck? Now you got at least 3 things to answer for. I'll be laughing my ass off if you come back here and try to deny all of this. You've been at this crap for a long time now.


c4OcEnY.png
 
Excellent, @manhood101.com

You've been on today.

n7pbHJ6.png


I have loads of YouTube videos and other shit I can just dump on you if you're up for that debate.

Don't be that "faggot coward keyboard warrior" bro. Show us what you're really made of.
 
ActualKiwi said:
As people have postulated before, he only wants to do it "Live" so he can essentially steamroll the opponent with yelling, heckling and abusive language- he's basically that scared of letting the other people get their logical, well thought out arguments in that he utterly refuses to let them, hence the seemingly psychotic aversion to text-based debates or discussion.
Click to expand...
It's a favorite tactic of assholes to scream that you need a reference or source in a verbal argument. Also it's interesting that he has a detailed thread about how science isn't authoritative and is misused. It's technically correct but it clearly exists simply as a reference to give cult members who stumble upon proper scientific findings in contradiction to his own crap.

Much like how scientology shuts down detractors from psychiatry, psychology, and neurology by cataloging the legitimate failures and shortcomings of the studies and then getting their members to memorize that shit.

sugoi-chan said:
Fairly certain the first woman is Christina Hendricks, aka Joan from Mad Men. She's admitted it interviews in the past to being a feminist.
Click to expand...

We need a collection of unauthorized celebrities featured in his advertising. Someone who has an IMBD account (I know someone does somewhere) needs to contact these people's agents so that he can get pounded with DMCAs and shit. If you just post their email addresses or phone numbers at least I'll contact them.

Let's refrain from getting his website outright shut down just yet though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom