H
HG 400
Guest
kiwifarms.net
I nominate @Rin @ChuckSlaughter and @DrChristianTroy as our debate team.
Holy fuck he's almost half as autistic as @cat
Holy fuck he's almost half as autistic as @cat
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
G
GS 281
Guest
kiwifarms.net
Becase autism is better when you can watch it than when you can read it and watching the average Loveshy reg stammer out "lel I Trull U" at the first easily refutable point of @manhood101.com would be a.) comedic gold; b.) proof that we are as autistic as other boards say we are and c.) just fun to watch.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
This forum is exactly as autistic as everyone says it is and I don't need to watch a cuck and an autistic have slappy fits to prove it.
G
GS 281
Guest
kiwifarms.net
I do.
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2015
The debate would end in five minutes after his mother shows up on camera to yell at him for not flushing the toilet, followed by him fumbling with the webcam trying to shut it off as his vision clouds up with impotent tears.
G
GS 281
Guest
kiwifarms.net
J
JU 199
Guest
kiwifarms.net
We all know that male sexuality is very visual in nature. This is why advertisers use sex to sell their products. This is why restaurants don't hire 400lbs. cows to be hostesses. They put the hot girl in the low cut dress up front. This is why the highest selling pornography is made up of young, visually attractive women. This is why women spend billions of dollars annually on makeup and outfits when they go out on dates.
They are all banking on the fact that men can be manipulated through their sexuality.
And this is all perfectly legal. It's perfectly okay to defraud a man and take his money by manipulating his sexuality.
So if we expect men to change their behavior once their sexuality has been manipulated visually, how can we then hypocritically claim that men shouldn't act when a woman is dressed like a slut?
It's completely bullshit to claim that men should be able to "control themselves" when we already know it's not about self-control. It's about MANIPULATING MALE SEXUALITY. If it was merely a matter of self control, the entire billion dollar advertising industry would go bankrupt overnight because men would simply "control" their sexuality and not make those buying decisions.
It's no different than stroking a man's cock and knowing it will get hard, and then just changing the context of the stroke and claiming that it shouldn't get hard.
It's the same fucking stroke.
The sexual desire that is causing a man to throw his money away at a bar, on porn, on a prostitute, on a date or a woman seeking a favor is the same male sexuality being daily exploited by our feminist society.
If a woman is dressed like a slut, my question is, how can she not expect him to act when these urges are directly created by her willful visual stimulation?
How can she expect to legislate against the very nature of male sexuality?
Since it's already been proven that men will act based on how they've been visually manipulated, why should she be allowed to manipulate him with impunity?
They are all banking on the fact that men can be manipulated through their sexuality.
And this is all perfectly legal. It's perfectly okay to defraud a man and take his money by manipulating his sexuality.
So if we expect men to change their behavior once their sexuality has been manipulated visually, how can we then hypocritically claim that men shouldn't act when a woman is dressed like a slut?
It's completely bullshit to claim that men should be able to "control themselves" when we already know it's not about self-control. It's about MANIPULATING MALE SEXUALITY. If it was merely a matter of self control, the entire billion dollar advertising industry would go bankrupt overnight because men would simply "control" their sexuality and not make those buying decisions.
It's no different than stroking a man's cock and knowing it will get hard, and then just changing the context of the stroke and claiming that it shouldn't get hard.
It's the same fucking stroke.
The sexual desire that is causing a man to throw his money away at a bar, on porn, on a prostitute, on a date or a woman seeking a favor is the same male sexuality being daily exploited by our feminist society.
If a woman is dressed like a slut, my question is, how can she not expect him to act when these urges are directly created by her willful visual stimulation?
How can she expect to legislate against the very nature of male sexuality?
Since it's already been proven that men will act based on how they've been visually manipulated, why should she be allowed to manipulate him with impunity?
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2015
Translation: Professor has no fucking idea how to interact with people.
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2015
So wait, this is the douche who spams his links everywhere? And he is a True Belieber? Not just some troll version of what he purports?
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2015
J
JU 199
Guest
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2015
So the tl;dr summary of Manhood101 for the uninitiated:
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2015
He reads like Ian Ironwood, but lazier. People who pay for this scam deserve every bit of non-help or false hope it gives.
J
JU 199
Guest
kiwifarms.net
I knew professor sounded familiar. Same pseudo-sociological nonsense, just with less effort and more salt.
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2015
This thread is so fucking beautiful. I know it will end well.
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2015
So you agree with them saying that bitches should be hit for not staying in the kitchen?
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2015
You haven't been around @testingwaters much have you?
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2015
Jesus, I don't remember this thread being 14 pages already. I got a lot of reading to do.
Edit: Like at least 50% of that guy's posts are copy paste.
Edit: Like at least 50% of that guy's posts are copy paste.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2015
He's too busy figuring out which petting zoo in his area has the least security