💊 Manosphere manhood101.com - The Cuck Academy

  • Thread starter Thread starter HG 400
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
why would i want anyone wasting their times stuttering and stammer in a video debate? it's just going to boil down to "women are controlled by animalistic needs" versus "nuh uh women are people you just can't get laid lol" over and fucking over again.

Becase autism is better when you can watch it than when you can read it and watching the average Loveshy reg stammer out "lel I Trull U" at the first easily refutable point of @manhood101.com would be a.) comedic gold; b.) proof that we are as autistic as other boards say we are and c.) just fun to watch.
 
Becase autism is better when you can watch it than when you can read it and watching the average Loveshy reg stammer out "lel I Trull U" at the first easily refutable point of @manhood101.com would be a.) comedic gold; b.) proof that we are as autistic as other boards say we are and c.) just fun to watch.

The debate would end in five minutes after his mother shows up on camera to yell at him for not flushing the toilet, followed by him fumbling with the webcam trying to shut it off as his vision clouds up with impotent tears.
 
Professor1.jpg
We all know that male sexuality is very visual in nature. This is why advertisers use sex to sell their products. This is why restaurants don't hire 400lbs. cows to be hostesses. They put the hot girl in the low cut dress up front. This is why the highest selling pornography is made up of young, visually attractive women. This is why women spend billions of dollars annually on makeup and outfits when they go out on dates.

They are all banking on the fact that men can be manipulated through their sexuality.

And this is all perfectly legal. It's perfectly okay to defraud a man and take his money by manipulating his sexuality.

So if we expect men to change their behavior once their sexuality has been manipulated visually, how can we then hypocritically claim that men shouldn't act when a woman is dressed like a slut?

It's completely bullshit to claim that men should be able to "control themselves" when we already know it's not about self-control. It's about MANIPULATING MALE SEXUALITY. If it was merely a matter of self control, the entire billion dollar advertising industry would go bankrupt overnight because men would simply "control" their sexuality and not make those buying decisions.

It's no different than stroking a man's cock and knowing it will get hard, and then just changing the context of the stroke and claiming that it shouldn't get hard.

It's the same fucking stroke.

The sexual desire that is causing a man to throw his money away at a bar, on porn, on a prostitute, on a date or a woman seeking a favor is the same male sexuality being daily exploited by our feminist society.

If a woman is dressed like a slut, my question is, how can she not expect him to act when these urges are directly created by her willful visual stimulation?

How can she expect to legislate against the very nature of male sexuality?

Since it's already been proven that men will act based on how they've been visually manipulated, why should she be allowed to manipulate him with impunity?
Professorisdisapoint2.png
 
Took a brief look at the site. It ain't too bad. While they are a bit off by blaming feminism for everything when it's only part of the problem, a lot of their advice is reasonable.

So what gives? Are you guys psycho man hating feminists or just idiots?
So you agree with them saying that bitches should be hit for not staying in the kitchen?
 
Jesus, I don't remember this thread being 14 pages already. I got a lot of reading to do.

Edit: Like at least 50% of that guy's posts are copy paste.

He's too busy figuring out which petting zoo in his area has the least security
 
Back
Top Bottom