💰 Grifter "Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Bruce LaLiLuLeLo said:
After watching todays MATI I feel like I should give Josh and especially Tiny some hints for the LSAT question. Its like a general problem solving question asked all around the place and I have a bit of experience from just doing a fuckton of these timed, enough for 5 lifetimes.
View attachment 7042113
You start working backwards from the facts at hand instead of listing all the possible combinations of the first two digits cause thats a waste of time.
If we were to take the number as mnxyz, then n=2m and x<z
If z in this case is 1 then theres only one number x can take considering theres only one number smaller than 1 and each number can occur only once, so x would be 0
The remaining numbers would be 2, 3, 4. To satisfy n=2m only one pair is possible, m is 2 and n is 4.
The given number would be 24031
So the correct option would be A.
Im gonna preempt and say, yes I know you dont care, I am sorry and I will fuck off.
Click to expand...
This is the correct logic to solve the problem. Josh got both questions correct.
The third rule explicitly states that the value of the second digit must be exactly twice that of the first digit. This forbids zero from being in either the first or second position because:
  • If zero is in the first position, there is no other potential digit that is exactly twice the value of zero, since twice the value of zero is zero. The only digit that could fulfill this rule is another zero, which violates the no repeating digit rule.
    • Let n = 1, 2, 3, or 4
    • 0 * n = 0
  • If zero is in the second position, there is no other potential digit that can be in the first position that can have its value doubled to make zero
    • 1 * 2 = 2
    • 2 * 2 = 4
    • 3 * 2 = 6
      • This also eliminates 3 from being able in the first position, since 6 is not a valid digit
    • 4 * 2 = 8
      • This also eliminates 4 from being able to be in the first position, since 8 is not a valid digit
So Josh's logic stating that the first two digits must be 1-2 or 2-4 is correct. Because of this and the rule stating that no digits are repeated, 2 must always precede 3 in sequence, so his second answer is also correct.
If I'm logic-ing correctly, there are five possible codes:
  1. 1-2-0-3-4
  2. 1-2-0-4-3
  3. 1-2-3-0-4
  4. 2-4-0-3-1
  5. 2-4-1-0-3
 
Bruce LaLiLuLeLo said:
It's there in the question, if the last digit of an acceptable code is 1

Fairly the same. Apologies for the um acktually but the general iq test or the fsiq which is the standardized test across the world measures perception and information processing more than intelligence (which is why it has questions based on 3d figure orientation, vocab, memory retention etc). I think what you're referring to is ravens progressive matrices which is the test with the problem figure questions, complete the series with the right figure, which is more complicated. Even that has only one type of problem solving compared to the 10 or so types generally asked in competitive examinations and hiring tests. This LSAT question in particular is not really complicated, in Asian countries they teach this stuff to 13 year olds so it's baffling to me personally that someone like Destiny cannot solve it.
Click to expand...
Thanks, I wasn't able to make it out.
 
i was not high IQ enough to realize that taking an IQ test on stream would result in dumb people telling you you got answers wrong

there were multiple people trying to tell me that one of the first two numbers could be 0 because zero multiplied is zero, not realizing that the language "twice the value" precludes any multiplication of zero, because 0*2 is not two zeroes, it is zero. you can affirm that four is exactly twice two because 4/2=2, and you can affirm that two is exactly twice one because 2/1=2, but there is no number where n/0=2.
 
Null said:
there were multiple people trying to tell me that one of the first two numbers could be 0 because zero multiplied is zero, not realizing that the language "twice the value" precludes any multiplication of zero, because 0*2 is not two zeroes, it is zero. you can affirm that four is exactly twice two because 4/2=2, and you can affirm that two is exactly twice one because 2/1=2, but there is no number where n/0=2.
Click to expand...
But did you know that 1x1=nigger?
 
Null said:
realize that taking an IQ test on stream would result in dumb people telling you you got answers wrong
Click to expand...
kiwifarms lsat special olympics when

edit: also i was thinking after the last MATI about destinys dick sucking that him and fuentes are kind of just two sides of the same coin. midwit internet debate bros who like pee pees in their mouths.
 
Last edited:
New Dave Blunts track dropped and it's a banger.
He's a fat, gross negroid, but this line got me good.
KanKan talkin shit but I heard he like lady boys

KanKan fuck with transgenders, he might be a gay nigger
Click to expand...
 
Gk_32nRW0AEXF1S.jpg

Apparently raping, beating and sex trafficking underaged girls is considered "free speech" now. I knew making a guy who follows the Tate's on Twitter the VP is going go result in something like this. Misogynistic homosexuals gotta stick together I guess. Candace Owens's husband is good friends with Tate as well, which is why she defends them so hard. Coincidentally her husband is also a closeted homosexual and Candace is his beard, same as Vance and his wife. What a fucking embarrassing mess these "conservatives" are.

Gk_4kjgXMAAW9l-.jpg

Giving this fat faced meth-baby a position of power was a huge mistake.
 
Lidl Drip said:
View attachment 7045338

Apparently raping, beating and sex trafficking underaged girls is considered "free speech" now. I knew making a guy who follows the Tate's on Twitter the VP is going go result in something like this. Misogynistic homosexuals gotta stick together I guess. Candace Owens's husband is good friends with Tate as well, which is why she defends them so hard. Coincidentally her husband is also a closeted homosexual and Candace is his beard, same as Vance and his wife. What a fucking embarrassing mess these "conservatives" are.

View attachment 7045353

Giving this fat faced meth-baby a position of power was a huge mistake.
Click to expand...
It really seems as if the American neu-Right takes the approach of circling the wagons whenever someone within or adjacent to their circle gets attacked. I honestly wonder if this response is intentional or instinctual after the years of witnessing 'purity-tests' from the Left. The later always claimed to be a diverse movement, but the 'intersectionality' really ended up forcing a fixed dogma; the former have taken more to the 'big-tent' approach, even if that means welcoming in hucksters and miscreants. IMHO, this is only temporarily sustainable, as the big-tent is united only in being opposed to the previous Liberal order -- unity in opposition never forms lasting bonds, only temporary alliances.
 
dvorak said:
someone within or adjacent to their circle
Click to expand...
How is Tate in their circle tho? He is not American. He is not conservative. He is not Christian. He is a brown, muslim, british national who lives in Romania because he thought the authorities there would be more lenient on his underaged sex trafficking empire. Why do conservative Americans consider him "one of us"? He is everything they claim to stand against.

IMO Tate is the right's Epstein. They defend him because they want access to the women and girls he sells.
 
Not Really Here said:
Every motherfucking time, you have to get age verification for OTC cold/flu shit. During cold, and flu season, while you're sick.
400% improvement over standing in line behind an obese neighbor, attempting to pass a bad check, while a 'Rican chick hits the manager call button, and drops her hand down to her knife.
Click to expand...
For me it’s alcohol. I hate picking up a case of beer and not being out the door because so and so is demanding a coupon be applied and can’t figure out how the scan works while the person who’s supposed to check cards is away because fuck all knows why so a quick 2 minute trip turns into 10-15 minutes. Meanwhile when I go to pick up some nicotine pouches I just scan my ID, why can’t I just scan my ID at the self check out?
 
Null said:
not realizing that the language
Click to expand...
The Euros have a point in referring to it as 'maths', we don't have the early meme of 'group of differing rulesets.'
AncientPhosphur said:
why can’t I just scan my ID at the self check out?
Click to expand...
State law may require a visual inspection, to relieve criminal liability. Even at the county level, they may have a different standard depending on location (eg. Grocery store, convivence store, and liquor stores.)
 
Lidl Drip said:
How is Tate in their circle tho?
Click to expand...
That's why I also said 'adjacent', meaning not in, but being at this present moment next to; he's obviously not 'conservative' (which is really becoming a nebulous term now), but he's managed to piss off some of the same people who have been going after the right for many years -- enemy of my enemy is my friend type of thinking.

Lidl Drip said:
Why do conservative Americans consider him "one of us"? He is everything they claim to stand against.
Click to expand...
As I previously posted, the paradigm on the right is 'big-tent'. You don't have to like it -- and I surely don't -- but that's how they are organizing right now. I would add more here but I would just be repeating the sentiment expressed in my last post.
 
Anyone ever hear of Raw Time with Tinarina? This video was suggested to me by the youtube algo
and now I'm seeing stuff about her pop up everywhere.
I think it's kinda intriguing that she did this show at the turn of the millennium in Austin Texas and 10 years or so later Ghost does TCR and gets people to troll him kinda the same. I really don't think there's anymore connection than that but I like to think that Tiffy hung up on people so Ghost could shake his cans. This is all new to me and I thought some in this thread might find it interesting if for no other reason than as a distraction from the usual sperging.
 
Lidl Drip said:
View attachment 7045338

Apparently raping, beating and sex trafficking underaged girls is considered "free speech" now.
Click to expand...
It's the UK, so I assume their only problem with him is saying naughty things on the Internet and having wrong ideas, not the 'brown Muslim man beating, raping, and pimping white teenage girls' part, which they seem to tolerate these days.
 
Last edited:
I was looking up shitboxes on marketplace and randomly got an ad for an OLD BAY watch
Old bay watch .JPG OLD BAY Timepiece – Tsao Baltimore.png
@Null you a watch guy?
 
Last edited:
Pure Autism said:
Ok, I have to preface this with stating that this is not nutritional advice.
Click to expand...
Sounds like very sound nutritional advice if your goals are retard offspring and mercury poisoning.

PunkinMan said:
Wypipo don't season dey watches
Click to expand...
Honestly the overseasoning thing plus the deafness to smoke alarms thing plus the general culture preference for being as loud and obvious as possible thing plus everything else makes me think that black people might just be genetically predisposed to low perceptiveness. Crazy, I know.
 
1. Screenshot 2025-03-02 163839.png
mary cate delvey called brianna wu "wu tang man" and i think this is very funny
2. Screenshot 2025-03-02 163854.png
twitter terfs are apparently doing an award for themselves tonight.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom