- Joined
- Nov 30, 2016
If you're white, straight, not depressed or anxious, and like yo genitals you ain't with da progressive movement. DUH!
💼 Careercow Lindsay M Amer / Queer Kid Stuff - Makes LGBT SJW Style videos for children, complete with creepy music
- Thread starter DonaldJTrump
- Start date
-
🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2013
Welcome to the club. Guys have been having trouble with traps for years now. Although from what I understand they're now acting as if they too are deserving of sex and it's the totally the guy's fault for not wanting to fuck them.
No, it's their fault for thinking that a straight man, or gay woman, wants somebody with a dick between their legs.
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2016
One thing I notice with SJWs is they say that "biological males can act female and be female!" and yet at the same time say "different genitals do not make you act any different!"
So although you can identify and act as a female, being female actually has no difference to being male besides genitals according to them.
But they don't care if it doesn't make sense. They just approve of anything remotely transgressive.
So although you can identify and act as a female, being female actually has no difference to being male besides genitals according to them.
But they don't care if it doesn't make sense. They just approve of anything remotely transgressive.
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2015
Again, theory of mind.
Because they're willing to fuck people of any gender, anyone who won't is wrong to them because they can't see outside their own perspective/echo chamber. (Everyone I talk to thinks like I do so that means it must be how everyone thinks)
It also helps that they don't get that many offers for sex becauase they're trans and if they were actually successful then they'd have a smorgasbord of dick and pussy guilted into liking bad traps in front of them, so that's incentive.
They just hate mainstream society and love underdogs because it helps them feel like a civil rights era protester, fighting the evil racist system even though they were born 50+ years too late. Therefore anything that has/had/appears to them like it's in power is evil (whites, men, cis, straights, thinness, capitalism, not being mentally ill, Christians, America, I've even seen some articles demonizing gay men, hell there were an influx of articles after Trump was elected blaming white women for society's ills)
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2014
really shouldn't be using number in your sentence above the age of 5 but then again she is probable doing it because she is a kid on the inside(or wants to diddle them)
- Joined
- May 27, 2015
Just seen the vids in the OP....
I would not let this fruity headcase or his/her/its AIDS-teddy within a mile of any child.
I would not let this fruity headcase or his/her/its AIDS-teddy within a mile of any child.
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2015
"We need to respect people's sexual preferences, but that hot straight guy I wanna fuck but he shot me down should be forced to be attracted to fat, ugly, disabled, non-traps like me because transphobia or something."
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Heterotopic spaces.
Heterospatial spaces.
Hm...
Little girls sort of get high on the institution of marriage, especially if it involves princesses. But of course, it is -- most of all in the case of Disney (that company is almost surrealistically prudish) -- basically "asexual romance", that is, romance with the sexual aspects blotted out.
Children do, in fact, have a kind of protosexuality which develops out of the basic human need for closeness and warmth. They may enjoy cuddling with each other or with a stuffed animal. This is quite far removed from what adults consider sex, but it is the psychological substrate out of which sexual desires develop during puberty.
Content which includes some allusions to sexuality are not necessarily damaging to children (just look at the original version of "Sailor Moon"); they usually just ignore or don't even notice the sexual content. <pl>Heck, I read "Brave New World" at the ripe old age of ten, it didn't permanently scar me.</pl>
That said, I cannot imagine any child would profit from or even enjoy a show about frikkin pronouns, LGBTQ activism, etc. Trying to pull children into their cause is the only thing which really annoys me about SJWs. The rest of their stuff is just silly and mildly amusing.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2014
People like this actually mess up my ability to stay detached. I can't just wtch them and laugh, because I find myself actually getting enraged that someone out there is trying to actively warp children before they even have a chance to figure out who they are.
TiredConlanger
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 29, 2015
Agreed, though my experience witnessing shit on the other side of the debate. I'm very blunt that I'm an FtM tranny, but it's absolutely gob-smacking how many trannies and transtrenders lately feel entitled to have sex with people who simply don't like a dick or a vag, or a surprise dick/vag.
...Despite how that is important when it comes to sex. They delude themselves into thinking that nuances of sexual orientation are just a preference to be changed or are willful choices.
That's part of why one of Justin/"Riley"'s videos recently is so goddamn creepy, because a similar rhetoric has been around for the last few years. You shouldn't be guilting people into having sex and saying shit like only having sex with certain genitalia involved needing to be "unlearned" sounds awfully a lot like conversion therapy's rhetoric. It's the rhetoric called the "cotton ceiling" (named after the "glass ceiling" concept) and it's creepy as fuck. It's saying that not fucking whoever you want is the same as being discriminated against in terms of pay/work positions/etc. Even though TERFs are a goddamn cancer themselves, they are correct that it is rapey as hell.
Though with these people, regarding the "kids are queer because they're not part of the economy" then implies, hilariously enough, that the LGBT community cannot participate meaningfully in any economy and that they're all on a
. This is why people need to think things through before posting shit for all the world to see, because a modicum of thought reveals they think the group they're championing are all gibbering retarded monkeys or something. 
It's also really fucked up, because children are not sexual, no matter what Freud said about any of that. They do not understand sexuality at all. If they do, that means they've been sexually abused or are being groomed for abuse. That's the whole thing about puberty, that that's when a person starts having changes to physically prepare them for being sexual for when they're adults. If they screw around with each other during puberty/masturbate/etc., that's normal in the "this feels good, so I'm gonna do it" mindset they tend to have, but they're still immature. That's why the adults who want to bone someone immediately after they hit puberty are fucked up, because it's predatory behavior targeting a vulnerable, immature person.
Then again, all these activists lately are bigots and retards. It isn't surprising, but the idiocy is still irritating as hell, especially when they wiggle their way into positions of power.
- Joined
- May 27, 2015
Little girls sort of get high on the institution of marriage, especially if it involves princesses. But of course, it is -- most of all in the case of Disney (that company is almost surrealistically prudish) -- basically "asexual romance", that is, romance with the sexual aspects blotted out.
Children do, in fact, have a kind of protosexuality which develops out of the basic human need for closeness and warmth. They may enjoy cuddling with each other or with a stuffed animal. This is quite far removed from what adults consider sex, but it is the psychological substrate out of which sexual desires develop during puberty.
Content which includes some allusions to sexuality are not necessarily damaging to children (just look at the original version of "Sailor Moon"); they usually just ignore or don't even notice the sexual content. <pl>Heck, I read "Brave New World" at the ripe old age of ten, it didn't permanently scar me.</pl>
That said, I cannot imagine any child would profit from or even enjoy a show about frikkin pronouns, LGBTQ activism, etc. Trying to pull children into their cause is the only thing which really annoys me about SJWs. The rest of their stuff is just silly and mildly amusing.
I hate to add them to the debate, but it is telling that the nazis (sorry) also aimed over the heads of their enemies and targeted kids for their warped life-views.
"Your opposition matters not. We will own your children." Is a phrase Hitler was fond of spouting to his foes.
The SJWs are unwittingly acting in the same sick manner...
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Well, the SJWs are, like it or not, far less competent at it than the NSDAP.
The Nazis found ways to actually fascinate and radicalize children -- by offering them activities they found interesting: camping out, sports, games, activities, learning about "cool military stuff", etc.
The SJWs don't even get how to rally children to their cause. Everything they produce is just boring and bland, for adults and even more so for children.
Here, you can download "Our House", a picture book by SJWs. It's as tedious and cringy as it sounds.
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2015
Those fucking faces, Jesus Christ.
TiredConlanger
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 29, 2015
Has the "artist" ever seen another human before?
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2014
I don't understand why these people want to abolish gender because of trans people. They are such a tiny minority (most sources say that only around 0.3% of the population is transgender). Literally all we need to do is say “Just treat them with respect, like you would for anyone else.” We don’t need to be teaching 3 year old kids that “ACKCHYUALLY, there are 50 (some say 79) genders for you to choose from! You’re not a little girl/boy, you’re a demigirl!!!”
And honestly, like 99.99% of this shit boils down to “Many interests/hobbies/preferences are stereotyped as being masculine or feminine, so clearly the answer is to abolish all things male and female instead of teaching kids it’s okay to like “girly” or “guy” things.” Why do we need to uproot the concepts of male and female when all we really need to do is teach kids it's okay to like things that are usually associated with the opposite sex?
And honestly, like 99.99% of this shit boils down to “Many interests/hobbies/preferences are stereotyped as being masculine or feminine, so clearly the answer is to abolish all things male and female instead of teaching kids it’s okay to like “girly” or “guy” things.” Why do we need to uproot the concepts of male and female when all we really need to do is teach kids it's okay to like things that are usually associated with the opposite sex?
PantiesAreImportant
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2016
People likes to revolt against the system, cuz they believe they're special and different from the rest of the society. This shit has always been around, expect it's now about gender.
I think it's actually outdated and only shows the american population, but yeah, it's still probably rare.
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2016
So SJW is as close to the Nazi ideology. Amer must be having a field day with these SJW propaganda-esque books to give to children...all she needs now is to make a board game with "Die Cis Scum" and she's all set!Well, the SJWs are, like it or not, far less competent at it than the NSDAP.
The Nazis found ways to actually fascinate and radicalize children -- by offering them activities they found interesting: camping out, sports, games, activities, learning about "cool military stuff", etc.
The SJWs don't even get how to rally children to their cause. Everything they produce is just boring and bland, for adults and even more so for children.
Here, you can download "Our House", a picture book by SJWs. It's as tedious and cringy as it sounds.
Like the modern day version of the Pied Piper...but worse!
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Even if SJWs were as aggressive as Nazis (which they usually aren't), their ideology is far too exceptional and illogical and idiosyncratic to gain much traction beyond college campuses. In order to form a mass movement, they'd need to gain the support of unemployed steel workers, farmers, construction workers etc. But these rather follow Trump, because he -- whether realistically or not -- has promised to do something about their problems (jobs, wages). Has any SJW ever suggested means to alleviate unemployment or take economy out of recession? No, that's completely beyond their horizon. Their ideas and activities are only interesting for college kids who want the feeling of "fighting for the just cause" without fighting for the just cause -- because that would mean they'd have to leave their tumblr/youtube safespace, get out and actually do something...
- Joined
- May 22, 2015
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2014
Hormone Blockers Macht Frei.