💼 Careercow Lindsay M Amer / Queer Kid Stuff - Makes LGBT SJW Style videos for children, complete with creepy music

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
This bitch uses the word queer so much I don't even think the word has any meaning anymore.

Queer by money?

Queer by race?

What?
 
And, looking at her twitter followers, she follows both Natty and Justin, two full-on transtrenders who are clearly faking if you know anything about gender dysphoria.

Why am I not surprised?
 
http://mykidisgay.com/lindsay-amer/

Don't know if anyone's posted this yet, but this is also a thing.
Looks like she's written another book:
41I40lpivEL._SX339_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg


She's taking SJW to the next level.
 
Last edited:
This shit again.

The creator of the show has said the gems have no gender because they're fucking gems. They only happen to look female which all these trans activists have latched onto because it supports their desires.

I think you're being a little naïve about that, honestly. Sugar may have said that they're just gems that happen to look female, but she has also acknowledged that the show is shot through with feminist and LGBTBBQ themes, and said:
These things have so much to do with who you are, and there’s this idea that these are themes that should not be shared with kids, but everyone shares stories about love and attraction with kids. So many stories for kids are about love, and it really makes a difference to hear stories about how someone like you can be loved and if you don’t hear those stories it will change who you are. It’s very important to me that we speak to kids about consent and we speak to kids about identity and that we speak to kids about so much. I want to feel like I exist and I want everyone else who wants to feel that way to feel that way too.

Plus, if I understand correctly, gems aren't the only things that fuse in the show. Isn't there some ridiculous fusion of a little boy and a little girl into a bizarre creature looks like a monstrous tranny?

Edit: And, wait, I'm not up on the show's mythology, but isn't Steven's mother supposed to be a gem? How can a genderless gem that just happens to look female be a little boy's mother, exactly?
 
I learned in biology that sometimes people are born with an extra finger. This doesn't change the definition of a NORMAL hand to "4-6 fingers". No, there's five fingers that should be on each hand, and the polydactyl kids are freaks.

Same with intersex folks.

Oh, your junk is funky? You're an outlier and shouldn't really be counted, not a rule-smasher.
 
Looks like she's written another book:
View attachment 159966

She's taking SJW to the next level.
Invading Heterotopic spaces in Queer Theater, blah, blah, blah...

Has this bitch never worked on a theater production? There's a reason why the stereotype is that theater and homosexuality go together like peas and carrots, and it's not because of the Heterotopic whatever nonsense she's talking about. Practically everyone who has ever produced, acted in or even seen a play is gay.
 
Invading Heterotopic spaces in Queer Theater, blah, blah, blah...

Has this bitch never worked on a theater production? There's a reason why the stereotype is that theater and homosexuality go together like peas and carrots, and it's not because of the Heterotopic whatever nonsense she's talking about. Practically everyone who has ever produced, acted in or even seen a play is gay.
The synopsis:
"Queer topics are still taboo in cultural products for young people despite increasing representation of LGBTQ+ stories in popular culture and the recent legalization of same-sex marriage in the United States. This book explores ways in which theatre artists and creators could represent queer topics to young people without facing controversy. Using Kathryn Bond Stockton’s theory of the queer child, this book establishes that all children are queer and that this queerness should be reflected within their cultural products. Stockton’s theory joins those of theatre scholar Matthew Reason who claims that theatre for young audiences (by adults) is impossible. This impossibility leads to the conclusion that theatre for young audiences cannot reflect the queer child without facing resistance from heteronormative thought within schools defined by Foucault's heterotopic relational space. Barrel of Monkey's ensemble in Chicago, IL circumnavigates this rejection by allowing the queer child to create their own stories, paving the way for other mediums to truly reflect the queer child, by positioning the child as both creator and spectators."
(76 pages $40)


It's almost a word salad of nonsense, also I guess they've never heard of pantomime if they think theatre for kids by adults is impossible.
 
It offends me that she plays ukulele. Stop desecrating this instrument. People can play songs like Blackbird and Stairway to Heaven on that thing. Stop playing the same four chords. Stop.

"Queer topics are still taboo in cultural products for young people
No fucking shit. Sex in general is taboo in cultural products for young people. There's hardly any legitimate romance in things aimed at kids under 12.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom