LGBTQiwis

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
so, no proof... graet. same sex in animal kingdom can be taken as multiple things, yet gayfaggots in hopes to rub it in on the catholics and protestant's faces they say animals are homosexual, while totally forgetting semantics.

it's mostly a not die/not be alone, check all the videos related to animalgaeness and you'll see they do it for one of these two reasons but i guess people gotta make money so they give hopes to gaes by fooling them with such bullshit.

i'm just glad people stopped attacking gaes over light things tho but they really gotta notice not everyone is going to give a damn about their choices and will not be stupid enough to think it's a born trait either.
 
"Why, no, we're not commandeering your movement"

BB1e1LbG.img.jpg


:thinking:
 
I've been called a "Cis-White, Heterosexual, Alt-Right, Nazi, Trump loving Fascist.

Apparently, I am not allowed to not only enjoy sucking another guys cock, but I'm supposed to be ashamed of it... go figure.
 
Kiwis in this thread always have such hot experiences. I would love to be around a horny guy and have him cuddle me and let him feel up me. Or vice versa with a cute girl. I'm pretty touch starved and now I act kinda slutty. My theory

Been away for a few days and return to Kiwifarms to a state of utter stupefaction that I am not riddled with autistic ratings. Apologies for any errors in this post: I can type exceedingly fast but the resulting content is variable and may require extremely charitable interpretation.

Anyway @awoo my response would vary from day to day depending my excessively labile mood but ... under no circumstances will it be as good as you anticipated although sure, it's nice. I note that your post does not refer to a specific person or even sex, and while I am of course referring to a mere single quoted sentence, doesn't indicate anything about another individual existing in any capacity beyond what you would like to do with them. So I assume that if you have anything in common with me -- and I am admittedly a bit psychologically anomalous -- we are more or less talking about a slightly more sophisticated type of masturbation here. Except with possibly enormous planning time, expenses in food/drinks/accommodation, regret at your own superficiality, lack of self-control and time-wasting when you could have been doing something productive, and hating yourself for browsing a fucking catalogue or hitting up complete strangers like an erotomaniac moron. Lots of people claim to enjoy doing this but none of them seem happy to me, and the most promiscuous (not that this is you but lots of gays can envision no higher calling) seem the most unhappy. I hope you understand why it is terrifying thing for someone to be so base or bereft of purpose: you may as well make your goal in life, "I want to eat a meal today". Happiness requires having a variety of goals of varying timeframes and degrees of difficulty: even if you accomplish something enormously difficult, you immediately need another thing to work toward or you will be miserable. Hence the misery of the monomaniacal pursuit of the next hole. These people seem like ghosts to me: they will pass from the planet without leaving the slightest visible trace of their existence. How hellish and depressingly animal-like that seems to me. Especially if you live in a nice city where you are constantly surrounded by the fine architecture and landscaping of long-gone greats who are still somehow managing to hold out against eternity.

Love is different to the above because you have a genuine shared life/family-in-miniature in which you are of course enormously affectionate but most of what you do and talk about could equally well happen in a close friendship. Ideally, you support each other emotionally and help each other attain your goals, keep each other company, push each other to become the best person possible, keep life lively and have someone to make it fun to even do boring things together, etc. Sex is what you do 1% of the time together. Yet I say this wondering why my partner sleeping with someone else away from me would make me positively insane with jealousy, and why four days without sex -- oh no, we're becoming a couple of best friends -- was such a horrific thing to me. Maybe because it's a barometer of the future.

I know skin-hunger well but have no interest in touching strangers. Maybe you'd find this unsatisfying too. Sleeping with a casual partner after you have satiated yourself/returned from planet cumshot can be pretty annoying and sixty pounds of metabolically-active limbs draped across you can make the bed too warm for comfort. It is wonderful if you are in love though. In any case, if you are older than 21 and have been alone all this time, you are probably not aware of it, and may deny it, but you have spent too much time alone and had your personality develop too long in its own arc unaffected by the gravity of others that days at a time in the company of others will be noisome to you. You will have more trouble surrendering your privacy and independence and become irked by others' snoring, banal conversation, bizarre habits, and crippled telepathic faculties. Maybe not if you're in love.

Also one thing maybe worth keeping in mind -- it has at any rate occurred to me -- is that sex is probably the most severely variety-limited recreational thing you can. A dick will not spit its hundredth load at you and transform into its next exciting evolution. You will probably get the sense "there must be more to it than this" because you (and we, culturally) have aggrandized the idea of sex as super pleasurable to the point that it hurts to admit you can explore all the possibilities in a couple hours. A few more for it to become commonplace. Because to do so means admitting that you have one less thing than you anticipated in your mediocre life conducive to happiness. New partners will simulate variety to an extent and for a while but let's not fool ourselves -- we're not playing Spore: there's minimal likelihood that biology will present you with an intriguing surprise. Maybe the dimensions and pigmentation of your target anatomy of choice will be different in a good way. A little depressing. I have escaped this enormously unsatisfying state of affairs by having unconsciously made my own happiness dependent on the happiness of someone I love. I literally don't care if I get off at all: I'm happy and enjoying myself if he is. He more or less does the same. Which causes a strange bootstrapping effect where you can be having a great time almost objectively indistinguishable from your first few hottest encounters while simultaneously being bored or overfamiliar with the relevant anatomy. Unless you also get tired of seeing your partner happy, anyway.
 
still, anything that directly reduces offspring is subject to lots of selective pressure, so over time should get completely wiped out. this is why we don't see like 10% of the male population with malfunctioning penises

Sorry to double post but I just saw this.

It is now pretty clear from genome-wide association studies that homosexuality is not genetic. The only genomic differences between straights and gays evident from the exquisitely-precise statistical analysis of the full genomic sequences (and their relationship to known variables) of literally millions of people is that gays are a little higher in the Big 5 personality trait "openness to experience". If homosexuality were genetic, then yes, it would be declining under fairly rapid selection pressure as gays have markedly fewer kids than straights. Some imaginative people have proposed that the (factually) slightly-higher fertility of the sisters of gay men may be explained by a protective "gay uncle" effect but this is absurd on its face -- they'd need to be having like almost an extra kid each to make up for their celibate brother whereas I think it's like a tenth of this. Unless gay uncle helps nephew get some quality pussy too, maybe. Anyway, I can't be the only person who finds it hilarious to think of gay people as highly family-oriented individuals utterly indispensable to the mating of their sisters and brothers-in-law.

I would like to see a GWAS though on just bottoms, ideally obvious fairy gayfaces everyone knew would be gay from the age of three. We're so culturally accepting of homosexuality and apparently sexually malleable that maybe the GWAS I referred to earlier is full of junk self-reports from guys who'd have identified as straight at any other time than the present.

so, no proof... graet. same sex in animal kingdom can be taken as multiple things, yet gayfaggots in hopes to rub it in on the catholics and protestant's faces they say animals are homosexual, while totally forgetting semantics.

it's mostly a not die/not be alone, check all the videos related to animalgaeness and you'll see they do it for one of these two reasons but i guess people gotta make money so they give hopes to gaes by fooling them with such bullshit.

i'm just glad people stopped attacking gaes over light things tho but they really gotta notice not everyone is going to give a damn about their choices and will not be stupid enough to think it's a born trait either.

I struggled a little with the spelling here (and the second paragraph) but I don't see anything wrong here. Animals are dumb, hormone-driven near-sexual-automatons; sure. Roosters will fuck tennis balls; other animals will fuck anything with the right smell. I guess it might be excusable if we lived in some backwards culture that regularly looked to the beasts as a guide to regulating our conduct, but isolated arguments from nature (the penguin one! Not the Thomas Aquinas one!) give me the distaste I get when I know I am being manipulated by someone who views arguments as disposable tools, only effective to the degree they work irrespective of truthfulness. It's not like it would matter to them if I could prove that all animals are definitely inveterate nascar-watching heteros.

And as I posted out above you are correct that it doesn't seem to be inborn. If it is -- which requires that the last GWAS having returned no results for having been so replete with junk data -- there certainly won't a single "gay gene" (this would've been easy to find) but hundreds or thousands of alleles each linearly contributing a tiny tiny bit either positively or negatively towards likelihood of the occurrence of trait of homosexuality.
 
Last edited:
Been away for a few days and return to Kiwifarms to a state of utter stupefaction that I am not riddled with autistic ratings. Apologies for any errors in this post: I can type exceedingly fast but the resulting content is variable and may require extremely charitable interpretation.

Anyway @awoo my response would vary from day to day depending my excessively labile mood but ... under no circumstances will it be as good as you anticipated although sure, it's nice. I note that your post does not refer to a specific person or even sex, and while I am of course referring to a mere single quoted sentence, doesn't indicate anything about another individual existing in any capacity beyond what you would like to do with them. So I assume that if you have anything in common with me -- and I am admittedly a bit psychologically anomalous -- we are more or less talking about a slightly more sophisticated type of masturbation here. Except with possibly enormous planning time, expenses in food/drinks/accommodation, regret at your own superficiality, lack of self-control and time-wasting when you could have been doing something productive, and hating yourself for browsing a fucking catalogue or hitting up complete strangers like an erotomaniac moron. Lots of people claim to enjoy doing this but none of them seem happy to me, and the most promiscuous (not that this is you but lots of gays can envision no higher calling) seem the most unhappy. I hope you understand why it is terrifying thing for someone to be so base or bereft of purpose: you may as well make your goal in life, "I want to eat a meal today". Happiness requires having a variety of goals of varying timeframes and degrees of difficulty: even if you accomplish something enormously difficult, you immediately need another thing to work toward or you will be miserable. Hence the misery of the monomaniacal pursuit of the next hole. These people seem like ghosts to me: they will pass from the planet without leaving the slightest visible trace of their existence. How hellish and depressingly animal-like that seems to me. Especially if you live in a nice city where you are constantly surrounded by the fine architecture and landscaping of long-gone greats who are still somehow managing to hold out against eternity.

Love is different to the above because you have a genuine shared life/family-in-miniature in which you are of course enormously affectionate but most of what you do and talk about could equally well happen in a close friendship. Ideally, you support each other emotionally and help each other attain your goals, keep each other company, push each other to become the best person possible, keep life lively and have someone to make it fun to even do boring things together, etc. Sex is what you do 1% of the time together. Yet I say this wondering why my partner sleeping with someone else away from me would make me positively insane with jealousy, and why four days without sex -- oh no, we're becoming a couple of best friends -- was such a horrific thing to me. Maybe because it's a barometer of the future.

I know skin-hunger well but have no interest in touching strangers. Maybe you'd find this unsatisfying too. Sleeping with a casual partner after you have satiated yourself/returned from planet cumshot can be pretty annoying and sixty pounds of metabolically-active limbs draped across you can make the bed too warm for comfort. It is wonderful if you are in love though. In any case, if you are older than 21 and have been alone all this time, you are probably not aware of it, and may deny it, but you have spent too much time alone and had your personality develop too long in its own arc unaffected by the gravity of others that days at a time in the company of others will be noisome to you. You will have more trouble surrendering your privacy and independence and become irked by others' snoring, banal conversation, bizarre habits, and crippled telepathic faculties. Maybe not if you're in love.

Also one thing maybe worth keeping in mind -- it has at any rate occurred to me -- is that sex is probably the most severely variety-limited recreational thing you can. A dick will not spit its hundredth load at you and transform into its next exciting evolution. You will probably get the sense "there must be more to it than this" because you (and we, culturally) have aggrandized the idea of sex as super pleasurable to the point that it hurts to admit you can explore all the possibilities in a couple hours. A few more for it to become commonplace. Because to do so means admitting that you have one less thing than you anticipated in your mediocre life conducive to happiness. New partners will simulate variety to an extent and for a while but let's not fool ourselves -- we're not playing Spore: there's minimal likelihood that biology will present you with an intriguing surprise. Maybe the dimensions and pigmentation of your target anatomy of choice will be different in a good way. A little depressing. I have escaped this enormously unsatisfying state of affairs by having unconsciously made my own happiness dependent on the happiness of someone I love. I literally don't care if I get off at all: I'm happy and enjoying myself if he is. He more or less does the same. Which causes a strange bootstrapping effect where you can be having a great time almost objectively indistinguishable from your first few hottest encounters while simultaneously being bored or overfamiliar with the relevant anatomy. Unless you also get tired of seeing your partner happy, anyway.
are you okay?
 
recently had a WILD experience of a friend (who was autistic anyway) trooning out hard and cold.
he even went as far as to tell me that my own boyfriend was transphobic.
we found his twitter full of furry porn, calling us bigots and even calling me transphobic.
cuz i didnt fall for his bait of calling my boyfriend transphobic... or our friends...
why?
we told him that we didnt believe him being trans being real and he was using it as a way for him to be gay to be okay.
we cut him off.
we are transphobes.
he is now ebegging for money to move despite trashing his ability to have a place with us and us all helping him. many times.
a fucking 10k gofundme.
he keeps getting furry art. btw.
kinda fucking funny now.
in the moment? not so much.
still dont see how troon-ing out is more self acceptable as being gay considering our friend group is all a bunch of fucking queers but okay
 
honestly if my friend was nice to me and cuddled me I'd probably be willing to suck him off
the cuddling is important tho
Is this a specific friend or just any hypothetical brojob bestie?
 
recently had a WILD experience of a friend (who was autistic anyway) trooning out hard and cold.
he even went as far as to tell me that my own boyfriend was transphobic.
we found his twitter full of furry porn, calling us bigots and even calling me transphobic.
cuz i didnt fall for his bait of calling my boyfriend transphobic... or our friends...
why?
we told him that we didnt believe him being trans being real and he was using it as a way for him to be gay to be okay.
we cut him off.
we are transphobes.
he is now ebegging for money to move despite trashing his ability to have a place with us and us all helping him. many times.
a fucking 10k gofundme.
he keeps getting furry art. btw.
kinda fucking funny now.
in the moment? not so much.
still dont see how troon-ing out is more self acceptable as being gay considering our friend group is all a bunch of fucking queers but okay

a major goal of social justice is to find the least likeable groups that are still barely tolerated in broader society and shoving them in your face constantly to make you feel guilty for being honest about why those groups are unlikeable.

that's why SocJus tards talk nonstop about trannies and niggers. hardly anyone actually likes either of them.
 
Back
Top Bottom