LGBTQiwis

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
And to me it seems like the demographic that accepts lesbians, bisexuals and gay men but draws the line at trannies is really small. It's mostly the people that consider trannies giga-faggots and everyone else in LGBT - regular faggots.
So you're trying to appeal to the crowd that still refers to you as freaks and groomers, IMO.
It's not that they don't tolerate trannies period, they just won't make excuses for them when they commit sex crimes. And with trannies, it's usually a when, not an if.
 
And to me it seems like the demographic that accepts lesbians, bisexuals and gay men but draws the line at trannies is really small. It's mostly the people that consider trannies giga-faggots and everyone else in LGBT - regular faggots.
So you're trying to appeal to the crowd that still refers to you as freaks and groomers, IMO.
Those people that want to call regular homos goomers are never going to change their mind either way. At least by putting clear blue sky between us and the gender-bending pedos we can begin to wear away at that association and go back to the time when people were more willing to accept "regular faggots" that keep it between themselves and their partners and want to live otherwise normal lives except with buttsex and scissoring.

Honestly, "He's going to call me a groomer either way so I might as well not bother to throw out the groomers" is a weird take. Even if nobody ever 100% accepts "normal" homos it's still worthwhile to exorcise all the genderfreaks, fiddlers, and groomers out of the community.
 
And to me it seems like the demographic that accepts lesbians, bisexuals and gay men but draws the line at trannies is really small. It's mostly the people that consider trannies giga-faggots and everyone else in LGBT - regular faggots.
So you're trying to appeal to the crowd that still refers to you as freaks and groomers, IMO.
It really sucks that the modern LGBT+ crowd is assosiated with groomers, degenerates, and flamboyant attention whores that think being a faggot or trans is a personality trait.

A majority us want to be left alone. We just want to do our own thing without drawing attention to ourselves. We'd rather suck dick or dive into the muff without posting about it on social media.
 
It really sucks that the modern LGBT+ crowd is assosiated with groomers, degenerates, and flamboyant attention whores that think being a faggot or trans is a personality trait.

A majority us want to be left alone. We just want to do our own thing without drawing attention to ourselves. We'd rather suck dick or dive into the muff without posting about it on social media.
Social media has turned gay pride from "don't be ashamed of who you are" into "there's no such thing as TMI." Being a private person and not wanting your intimate details online is now viewed with suspicion.
 
Gays and even lesbians have just as much of a hedonistic and sexually deviant lifestyle as most troons out there. Things will never change because the difference between the LGB and the rest of the alphabet is slim.
 
The idea that tolerance of the LGB will fall like a domino if the T topples is just a scare tactic leftists use to bring the more sensible queers to heel. If anything continuing to push the T as the face of the entire LGBT demographic will be what sours the public on queers as a whole.
I think it's kind of true to be honest, mostly because the T has become so cemented as part of the rest and whenever trannies do something retarded it's always with reference to the "LGBT community".

The whole community aspect has pretty much buggered the LGB section because now trannies are inherently linked through it, and activist gays (i.e the most visible group of gays that are what Joe Blogs sees on TV) refuse to do whats best and throw trannies under the bus.

The promiscuous gay culture doesn't help either. I know from having friends who are gay who are honestly actually probably less open about sexual stuff than a lot of straight people I know that it's not all of them, but the promiscuous ones again are the most visible.
 
Last edited:
I think it's kind of true to be honest, mostly because the T has become so cemented as part of the rest and whenever trannies do something retarded it's always with reference to the "LGBT community".

The whole community aspect has pretty much buggered the LGB section because now trannies are inherently linked through it, and activist gays (i.e the most visible group of gays that are what Joe Blogs sees on TV) refuse to do whats best and throw trannies under the bus.

The promiscuous gay culture doesn't help either. I know from having friends who are gay who are honestly actually probably less open about sexual stuff than a lot of straight people I know that it's not all of them, but the promiscuous ones again are the most visible.
The LGBs need to loudly and repeatedly say "These people don't speak for us and don't represent us" every time a tranny does something gross, or "pride" is turned into an open-air pervert festival.

It's the only course of action open to us. If we stay silent then the perverts, pedo activists, and trannies will carry on speaking for us and people will carry on making the association.
 
The same people who say all gays are diddlers are the same people who (rightly) cry foul when swivel-eyed loony feminists say "all men are rapists". They apparently don't recognise that they're arguing like hysterical women when it's coming out of their own mouths. That said, LGBs need to get rid of the TQ+ shit or we'll never shake off being called groomers.
Can't remember where I read it but it was a paper that argued pedophilia is not a gay phenomenon but a male one, it wasn't a feminist article but a discussion regarding sexual/criminal psychology. Once you get over 'not all' it made sense the way certain problems are simply more innate to specific groups. Violent crime, especially violent sexual crime is an overwhelmingly male problem. I think most men do accept this reality without balking, it's just we don't like to ALL be called rapists and groomers. The gotchas ignore straight male and female pedos/enablers too but I don't like making the topic some kind of competition.
 
Last edited:
My take on troons and how they water down the meaning of lesbian:

They're straight AGPs that has a fetish for lesbians and want to be lesbians

im a lesbian and I hate it when trannies use a label that doesn't even apply to them. The woke crowd thinks that someone is female just because they identify as one. So yea, "transbians" technically doesn't exist
 
i-got-news-for-you-that-means-youre-gay.gif
You wanted this so don't complain
 
Between the family holidays and the A&N section of the board, my eye muscles are tired of rolling back every time I see the self-congratulatory rictus of some old religious fundie thinking they're soooooooo clever they finally figured out that "all gays are the product of molestation!". If you don't recall being molested you must have repressed it. Is it because, being members of a cult that can only reproduce by grooming children into it, they're overly paranoid about someone else getting there? Since we're doing ludicrous psychoanalysis based on nothing but bigotry, I've never met a single fundie absolutely obsessed with buttsex (and MAN are they obsessed with it. They think about it more than I do, and I participate in it!) that wasn't, without fail, a skirt-chasing sex-obsessed horndog who thinks everyone else's life is as fixated on sex as theirs is.
A&N is truly the most retarded part of this site, a bunch of unthinking idiots who couldn’t critically analyze a news source or article if their lives depended on it.

They rant about the gays so much, meanwhile a bunch of them are self admitted losers. I think a lot of it is just anger at the world in general, but the trad religious larping is insufferable because you know most don’t actually believe it.

The only thing they’re actually consistent about is blind hatred.
I'm a blackpilled agp hsts pseudo-bisexual transmed repressor boymoding honmoder theyfab truscum tucute transtrender with brainworms
So this is what reading while having a stroke is like.
The promiscuous gay culture doesn't help either
It sure doesn’t and I wish it weren’t that way, but just like good Christian girls and the children of pastors if you repress someone too long it has a bad habit of all exploding at once.
 
They rant about the gays so much, meanwhile a bunch of them are self admitted losers
They rant about the homos being groomers while defending drawn child porn because it's like, just a cartoon man, what harm does beating your meat to cartoon kids do.
 
If you want to know who to blame for people thinking you're child groomers, you could start with the gay rights movement of the sixties and seventies. Plenty of the people who fought for your rights are also on record as defending the rights of grown men who want to fuck children. Harry Hay for example:

 
If you want to know who to blame for people thinking you're child groomers, you could start with the gay rights movement of the sixties and seventies. Plenty of the people who fought for your rights are also on record as defending the rights of grown men who want to fuck children. Harry Hay for example:

It's somehow both baffling and entirely unsurprising that so many prominent gays (like Owen Jones) are totally on board with the goals of the TRAs. After the damage caused by organisations like PIE and NAMBLA they might want to think twice, but no.
 
If you want to know who to blame for people thinking you're child groomers, you could start with the gay rights movement of the sixties and seventies. Plenty of the people who fought for your rights are also on record as defending the rights of grown men who want to fuck children. Harry Hay for example:

I don't disagree with you at all, I want all the groomers, trannies and pedos out of the LGB community. In fact I'd honesty prefer if there didn't have to be an LGB community of any kind, I'd much rather be treated as an individual on my own merits.
 
Back
Top Bottom