Leftist Memes - Or lack thereof...

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Well, enough about Covidian bullshit, how about commie gobbledygook
1642552116509.png

And Trump Sperging
1642552478145.png
 
Last edited:
round robin said:
Hold up, is there an Asian and a fucking JEW in that line-up? Do people still think whites are the most successful race in America?
Click to expand...
Ssshh. Progressatards can't decide whether Far Eastern Asians and Jews are Honorary Aryans on account of their generally higher IQ and degree of success or not.
Therefore they're "whatever fits the narrative best".
 
Slap47 said:
View attachment 2892489
Click to expand...
Because modern day potempkin villages are totally representative of China. These niggers probably look at the tourist districts in Shanghai and thing that all of China is like that.
Flaming Insignias said:
Seriously, give me a Branch Covidian thread.View attachment 2898822
View attachment 2898826
View attachment 2898827
View attachment 2898828
View attachment 2898829
View attachment 2898830
View attachment 2898832
Click to expand...
There isn't a branch covidian thread?
 
Flaming Insignias said:
Well, enough about Covidian bullshit, how about commie gobbledygook
View attachment 2898991
Click to expand...
Clothing, medical care, housing, and food depicted as literally springing out of thin air in the leftist "system." LMAO.

round robin said:
Hold up, is there an Asian and a fucking JEW in that line-up? Do people still think whites are the most successful race in America?
Click to expand...
Yes, they do. You can thank the modern "education" system for that.
 
SmartSelect_20220120-230210_Brave.jpg


Trump_www-scarfolk-blogspot-com.jpg

Many people are unaware that a young Donald Trump appeared on the cover of a book called The De-evolution of Mankind, published in Scarfolk by Pelican Books in 1975.

From the introduction:
"Scientists predict that, at some point in the early 21st century, humans will stop evolving and will start the process of de-evolution. Several signs will herald this decline:
i. People will stop reading books. It's estimated that the length of an average book will be eighteen words, including the title and copyright page.
ii. Increasingly, people will only vote for leaders who can communicate using an abbreviated, primitive dialect, a sort of "Dunce Patois" in which whole sentences will be reduced to single words: "True!", "Bad!", "Shame!", etc.
iii. The distinction between the real and the imaginary will be lost and fictional characters will ascend to the highest posts of office.
iv. Human hands will shrink through inactivity and will become little more than tiny, feeble scoops [...]

[...] The mighty space stations we once imagined in our future will drift unpopulated because the knowledge required to reach them will have been either outlawed or carelessly forgotten. The threadbare remnants of mankind will scrabble around a dying earth, daubing themselves with orange mud to avoid being burned due to the global overheating they said would never happen. We will return to this development in Chapter 4, which is entitled 'Consummate Dickheads'."
Click to expand...
 
cummytummies said:
View attachment 2901351
Click to expand...
See this is what I hate about social theory. "Centuries of Oppression" means fucking nothing, unless you're an immortal who has lived for centuries under said impression.
How long women were treated like property and denied rights is irrelevant in the context of modern de-jure equality.

MT Foxtrot said:
Actually like these. Fite me.
View attachment 2906039
View attachment 2906050
Click to expand...
The first one is dumb for the same (yet opposite) reason as I mentioned above. It's largely irrelevant how the Romans persecuted early Christians, when the modern 21st century tests-of-faith and pressure to abandon/renounce largely come from a secular culture.

The second is a false equivalency, as it assumes the Western Christians support what ISIS did to their Middle Eastern brothers and that the Middle Eastern Christians wouldn't see their church leaders as submissive, wordly pseudo-apostates for cowing to the non-sensical orders of earthly authorities.
While the buff Doge vs shabby Doge meme isn't right-wing in origin, it drifts eerily close to "the left right can't meme!" principle wherein a lefty simply puts their political message over an existing right-wing meme. Not quite, but close.
Plus, I'd bet $20 the author of this meme is an atheist boomer mad that the ebul Gen-Z Christians won't wear a mask to protect his healf.
 
MT Foxtrot said:
Actually like these. Fite me.
View attachment 2906039
View attachment 2906050
Click to expand...
The first one is actually pretty good, although a big part of the reason there are no Christian epics anymore is because Hollywood has become increasingly ambivalent, if not outright hostile, to Christianity. Christian movies are independent, lower budget productions now. Doesn't make modern Christian cinema any less lame.

The second one is both an appeal to worse problems and a false equivalency. The issue on the right isn't directly related to Christianity, and is a weird attempt to imply people are wimpy for not being compliant and submissive.

Kabuki Actor said:
View attachment 2906251

Trump_www-scarfolk-blogspot-com.jpg
Click to expand...
1642763872422.png

So aside from the accurate summary of Trump's speech patterns (which the writer may very well have just copied from Trump interviews at the time) not a thing in this fart huffing has actually happened.

I'll also be inclined to take leftist moaning about anti-intellectualism more seriously when they publicly admit that hood culture is a giant, idiotic steaming pile of shit. Since the hoodification of pop culture has been the single largest contributor to the dumbing down of America, and to a lesser degree the entire world by extension. But they won't do that cause it'd be racist.
 
Fanatical Pragmatist said:
See this is what I hate about social theory. "Centuries of Oppression" means fucking nothing, unless you're an immortal who has lived for centuries under said impression.
How long women were treated like property and denied rights is irrelevant in the context of modern de-jure equality.
Click to expand...
The "women being treated like property" thing is exaggerated to hell anyway. You can find many examples of female monarchs and women in authority throughout most of the time periods when women were supposedly just slaves with no rights.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom