🐱 Kyle Rittenhouse: All That’s Wrong With America

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
CatParty


On Aug. 23, Jacob Blake, a Black man in Kenosha, Wisconsin, walked over to his car, where his children were waiting for him to drive them home. The police shot him in the back seven times, and until recently, he was handcuffed to his hospital bed. As protests against his unjust shooting raged on, 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse shot at several protesters, killing two, only to later be hailed as a hero by conservative media sources. The discrepancy in their treatment by law enforcement and public figures is utterly despicable. This is white privilege.

Following protests in Kenosha on Aug. 23, right-wing commentators and politicians have tried to excuse Rittenhouse’s actions and elevate him as a hero. His portrayal as a misunderstood martyr is deeply unsettling, especially given modern media’s despicable treatment of Black men involved in cases of shootings or violence. In truth, this is who Rittenhouse is: a white man who, after proclaiming himself an armed militiaman there to protect businesses, shot dead two innocent protesters. We are actively normalizing the white supremacy rooted in our society when we amplify and defend white killers.

In fact, Rittenhouse broke the law before he even fired a shot: under Wisconsin law, it is a Class A misdemeanor for anyone under the age of 18 to openly carry a deadly weapon. Additionally, while Rittenhouse claimed he considered himself a militia member trying to protect life and property, destruction of property is never a sufficient excuse for taking a life.

Even at the protests, the Kenosha police’s inaction enabled Rittenhouse’s atrocities, largely underscoring the reality of white privilege. Despite the fact that armed militia members, of which Rittenhouse was a part, had no legitimate reason to be at the protest that night, the police thanked them for coming and offered them water. Protesters are dehumanized and vilified by police and the media when they are mainly Black, but Rittenhouse was able to openly carry a weapon and receive outright praise. After the shooting, police even allowed Rittenhouse to walk calmly toward them while protesters cried out that he had shot people. While this choice may have been made to ensure Rittenhouse did not hurt more people, it is still very indicative of the white privilege that a Black man would not have been granted.The police paved the way for this appalling shooting, leading to the tragic deaths of two protesters and the severe injury of another. The white privilege afforded to Rittenhouse during the protests is extremely telling of racial injustice in the U.S., especially considering the public’s reaction to his actions.

Although conservative speakers’ claim that he acted in self-defense, a New York Times analysis of the shooting reveals that the events that occurred are much more complex. Before the shooting, Rittenhouse was being pursued by a group for unknown reasons. Huber, one of the victims, launchedhimself at Rittenhouse to protect his girlfriend and the people around them, as Rittenhouse was armed and perceived as dangerous, according to Huber’s girlfriend. As protesters chased him, Rittenhouse fired his weapon four times. Even if the first shooting was an act of self-defense against a man who dived towards him with nothing more than a skateboard, it was still a massive overreaction and utterly illogical to shoot someone who did not possess a weapon. As for the later shootings, it is clear that they were not a form of self-defense, as he was being pursued for then having shot someone.

Despite Rittenhouse’s clear wrongdoing, conservative commentators have repeatedly justified his actions as self-defense. Fox News host Tucker Carlson commented, “How shocked are we that 17-year-olds with rifles decided they had to maintain order when no one else would?” This version of events is false at best and permissive of murder at worst. The media’s portrayal of Rittenhouse as a hero instead of a killer indicates the deep-rooted white supremacy in our nation and further facilitates police brutality against Black individuals. Rittenhouse wasn’t the hero in this story. Huber was.
Carlson was not alone in his vile rhetoric; President Donald Trump misconstrued the narrative, claiming protesters “very violently attacked” Rittenhouse. Congressman Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.) called Rittenhouse’s actions “100% justified self defense. Do not try to take a weapon away from a man or bear the consequences.” Other conservative speakers have followed suit, with far-right commentator Ann Coulter proclaiming she wanted him as president. Rhetoric by important public figures influences the public and unfortunately depicts larger American norms. By dismissing the severity of Rittenhouse’s actions, these public figures promote unlawful and unwarranted shootings, exacerbating racial injustice.
Despite Facebook’s designation of the shooting as a “mass murder,” which company policy forbids users from openly praising or supporting, people have rallied behind Rittenhouse on Facebook and Instagram, sharing fundraisers and supportive messages on social media. In fact, one fundraiser in his support was sharedmore than 17,700 times, and posts with phrases such as “Free Kyle” have received more than 70,000 interactions. Even some college students have rallied behind Rittenhouse, with Arizona State University’s College Republicans United actively raisingmoney to support his legal defense. These social media posts prioritize the comfort of a white killer over the lives of Black folk.
When Black people are murdered by the police, Republicans’ silence is deafening. But for Kyle Rittenhouse, a white man who killed protesters, they have moved heaven and earth to defend him. This blatant disconnect reveals much about the future of the Republican party and indicates how deeply embedded white supremacy is in this country. Elevating white shooters like Rittenhouse paves the way for more monsters like him, placing more Black individuals at harm.
If you see nothing wrong with the unjust excuses and blatant justification of murder, all I have left to say is this: check your white privilege.
Brammhi Balarajan (23C) is from Las Vegas.
 
A point I may have missed, but do we know yet who owned the car that Blake was trying to get away in, who the kids were who were inside, and whether he had any right to take them? There seem to be two possibilities here. One, that it was his car, and the kids were his from a different relationship who just happened to be present when he decided to harrass the ex he was banned from seeing. Two, he was stealing the same car that he had stolen four months earlier, but for some reason was also kidnapping her (and his) kids.
 
I have rewritten this authors retardation:

On Aug. 23, Jacob Blake, a Black man in Kenosha, Wisconsin, walked over to his car, where his children were waiting for him to drive them home. The police shot him in the back seven times, and until recently, he was handcuffed to his hospital bed. As protests against his unjust shooting raged on, 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse shot at several protesters, killing two, only to later be hailed as a hero by conservative media sources. The discrepancy in their treatment by law enforcement and public figures is utterly despicable. This is white privilege.

On Aug. 23, Jacob Blake, a nigger(1) in Kenosha, Wisconsin, ignored police commands and attempted to flee in a stolen vehicle, where his children were in a stolen vehicle about to taken by a violent felon and sex fiend. The police shot him in the back seven times, and until recently, he was handcuffed to his hospital bed. As protests and riots against a justifiable use of deadly force raged on, 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse shot at several protesters, killing two, only to later be hailed as a hero by conservative media sources. The discrepancy in their treatment by law enforcement and public figures is reasonable given one followed police commands and did not assault police . This is justice.


Following protests in Kenosha on Aug. 23, right-wing commentators and politicians have tried to excuse Rittenhouse’s actions and elevate him as a hero. His portrayal as a misunderstood martyr is deeply unsettling, especially given modern media’s despicable treatment of Black men involved in cases of shootings or violence. In truth, this is who Rittenhouse is: a white man who, after proclaiming himself an armed militiaman there to protect businesses, shot dead two innocent protesters. We are actively normalizing the white supremacy rooted in our society when we amplify and defend white killers.

Following protests in Kenosha on Aug. 23, right-wing commentators and politicians have tried to excuse Rittenhouse’s actions and elevate him as a hero. His portrayal as a misunderstood martyr is deeply unsettling, especially given modern media’s despicable treatment of Black men involved in cases of shootings or violence. In truth, this is who Rittenhouse is: a white man who, after proclaiming himself an armed militiaman there to protect businesses, shot dead two imminent deadly threats to his life. We are actively normalizing the right to life and self preservation when we amplify and stand up for those that use justifiable self defense.

In fact, Rittenhouse broke the law before he even fired a shot: under Wisconsin law, it is a Class A misdemeanor for anyone under the age of 18 to openly carry a deadly weapon. Additionally, while Rittenhouse claimed he considered himself a militia member trying to protect life and property, destruction of property is never a sufficient excuse for taking a life.

In fact, Rittenhouse may have broken the law before he even fired a shot: under Wisconsin law, it is a Class A misdemeanor for anyone under the age of 18 to openly carry a deadly weapon. Additionally, while Rittenhouse claimed he considered himself a militia member trying to protect life and property, and while destruction of property is never a sufficient excuse for taking a life when one is in immediate jeopardy of death or great bodily injury any reasonable use of force to stop the threat is justified.

Even at the protests, the Kenosha police’s inaction enabled Rittenhouse’s atrocities, largely underscoring the reality of white privilege. Despite the fact that armed militia members, of which Rittenhouse was a part, had no legitimate reason to be at the protest that night, the police thanked them for coming and offered them water. Protesters are dehumanized and vilified by police and the media when they are mainly Black, but Rittenhouse was able to openly carry a weapon and receive outright praise. After the shooting, police even allowed Rittenhouse to walk calmly toward them while protesters cried out that he had shot people. While this choice may have been made to ensure Rittenhouse did not hurt more people, it is still very indicative of the white privilege that a Black man would not have been granted. The police paved the way for this appalling shooting, leading to the tragic deaths of two protesters and the severe injury of another. The white privilege afforded to Rittenhouse during the protests is extremely telling of racial injustice in the U.S., especially considering the public’s reaction to his actions.

Even at the protests, the Kenosha police’s inaction enabled Rittenhouse’s actions, largely underscoring the reality of Democratic governors that refused to send national guard troops in sufficient numbers and their desire to coddle rioters. Taking into account the fact that armed militia members, of which Rittenhouse was a part, had allegedly answered a call for defense from a local business owner and put themselves in danger, the police thanked them for coming and offered them water. A violent riotous mob are supported and labeled mostly peaceful the media, but Rittenhouse was able to openly carry a weapon and receive mostly condemnation. After the shooting, police even allowed Rittenhouse to walk calmly toward them while protesters cried out that he had shot people though allegedly police could not hear the statements. The riotous mob paved the way for this self defense shooting, leading to the tragic deaths of two protesters and the severe injury of another. The benefit of the doubt afforded to Rittenhouse during the protests is extremely telling of how self defense is valued in the U.S., especially considering the public’s reaction to his actions.

Although conservative speakers’ claim that he acted in self-defense, a New York Times analysis of the shooting reveals that the events that occurred are much more complex. Before the shooting, Rittenhouse was being pursued by a group for unknown reasons. Huber, one of the victims, launched himself at Rittenhouse to protect his girlfriend and the people around them, as Rittenhouse was armed and perceived as dangerous, according to Huber’s girlfriend. As protesters chased him, Rittenhouse fired his weapon four times. Even if the first shooting was an act of self-defense against a man who dived towards him with nothing more than a skateboard, it was still a massive overreaction and utterly illogical to shoot someone who did not possess a weapon. As for the later shootings, it is clear that they were not a form of self-defense, as he was being pursued for then having shot someone.

Although conservative speakers’ claim that he acted in self-defense, a New York Times analysis of the shooting reveals that the events that occurred seemingly support this claim. Before the shooting, Rittenhouse was being pursued by a group for possibly putting out a dumpster rioters had set on fire. Huber, one of the decedents, attempted to disarm Rittenhouse as he was armed and perceived as heresay. As protesters chased him, Rittenhouse fired his weapon four times. Even if the first shooting was an act of self-defense against a man who dived towards him with nothing more than a skateboard, it was a justifiable use of deadly force as the skateboard can be a deadly weapon and was being used in such a manner.

(1) Jacob Blake was not a Black man, he was a domestic abusing and raping good for nothing nigger.

Anyways, I have a breakfast date and I don't want to waste more time with this retards arguments. I hope the author will realize that a skateboard is a deadly weapon right before some aggressor swings it for the final time causing her to black out and die from a sub dural hemotoma.
 
That's the AP official style now.
Straight from AP

AP style will continue to lowercase the term white in racial, ethnic and cultural senses.

I love that this is just dropped in there after the "black is a colour, not a person" line, with zero justification. No agenda here!

And then one day, for no reason at all...
 
Even if the first shooting was an act of self-defense against a man who dived towards him with nothing more than a skateboard, it was still a massive overreaction and utterly illogical to shoot someone who did not possess a weapon.

How about we settle this debate by you letting me hit you with a skateboard?
 
If they do throw this kid under the jail, I'm gonna laugh really hard.

If his lawyers have their way, that's probably exactly what's going to happen:

Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse portrayed by his lawyers as a ‘Minuteman' exercising his right to bear arms in a ‘war zone'


It looks like they care more about making a political statement than what's best for their client. I mean, isn't that exactly how his opponents have been describing him -- some crazy milita wannabe looking for a fight? I'm no legal expert, but I'd think going with the "scared teenager acting in self defense" would be much more likely to get him off.
 
I hate that actual self-defense is likely going to get crushed in this case. He was retreating to the best of his ability and shot three assailants intent on bodily harm when retreat was no longer an option.

Also, it needs to be said that one should not bring a skateboard to what might become a gunfight.
 
He killed a convicted pedophile. That's a good thing. I get a good laugh out of these creatures throwing a temper tantrum. He did nothing wrong.
 

Attachments

  • 03F759D2-DCBA-4265-BB3C-44C5B366F39C.jpeg
    03F759D2-DCBA-4265-BB3C-44C5B366F39C.jpeg
    142.8 KB · Views: 18
  • C8407B84-C932-4F48-AD13-C6D792B703D3.jpeg
    C8407B84-C932-4F48-AD13-C6D792B703D3.jpeg
    148.7 KB · Views: 17
destruction of property is never a sufficient excuse for taking a life

literally all governments and human history would like to have a word with you lol
 
This article really doesn't care about logic at all, it's insulting to the reader but I guess that works fine for libtards.
 
Back
Top Bottom