🐱 Kyle Rittenhouse: All That’s Wrong With America

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
CatParty


On Aug. 23, Jacob Blake, a Black man in Kenosha, Wisconsin, walked over to his car, where his children were waiting for him to drive them home. The police shot him in the back seven times, and until recently, he was handcuffed to his hospital bed. As protests against his unjust shooting raged on, 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse shot at several protesters, killing two, only to later be hailed as a hero by conservative media sources. The discrepancy in their treatment by law enforcement and public figures is utterly despicable. This is white privilege.

Following protests in Kenosha on Aug. 23, right-wing commentators and politicians have tried to excuse Rittenhouse’s actions and elevate him as a hero. His portrayal as a misunderstood martyr is deeply unsettling, especially given modern media’s despicable treatment of Black men involved in cases of shootings or violence. In truth, this is who Rittenhouse is: a white man who, after proclaiming himself an armed militiaman there to protect businesses, shot dead two innocent protesters. We are actively normalizing the white supremacy rooted in our society when we amplify and defend white killers.

In fact, Rittenhouse broke the law before he even fired a shot: under Wisconsin law, it is a Class A misdemeanor for anyone under the age of 18 to openly carry a deadly weapon. Additionally, while Rittenhouse claimed he considered himself a militia member trying to protect life and property, destruction of property is never a sufficient excuse for taking a life.

Even at the protests, the Kenosha police’s inaction enabled Rittenhouse’s atrocities, largely underscoring the reality of white privilege. Despite the fact that armed militia members, of which Rittenhouse was a part, had no legitimate reason to be at the protest that night, the police thanked them for coming and offered them water. Protesters are dehumanized and vilified by police and the media when they are mainly Black, but Rittenhouse was able to openly carry a weapon and receive outright praise. After the shooting, police even allowed Rittenhouse to walk calmly toward them while protesters cried out that he had shot people. While this choice may have been made to ensure Rittenhouse did not hurt more people, it is still very indicative of the white privilege that a Black man would not have been granted.The police paved the way for this appalling shooting, leading to the tragic deaths of two protesters and the severe injury of another. The white privilege afforded to Rittenhouse during the protests is extremely telling of racial injustice in the U.S., especially considering the public’s reaction to his actions.

Although conservative speakers’ claim that he acted in self-defense, a New York Times analysis of the shooting reveals that the events that occurred are much more complex. Before the shooting, Rittenhouse was being pursued by a group for unknown reasons. Huber, one of the victims, launchedhimself at Rittenhouse to protect his girlfriend and the people around them, as Rittenhouse was armed and perceived as dangerous, according to Huber’s girlfriend. As protesters chased him, Rittenhouse fired his weapon four times. Even if the first shooting was an act of self-defense against a man who dived towards him with nothing more than a skateboard, it was still a massive overreaction and utterly illogical to shoot someone who did not possess a weapon. As for the later shootings, it is clear that they were not a form of self-defense, as he was being pursued for then having shot someone.

Despite Rittenhouse’s clear wrongdoing, conservative commentators have repeatedly justified his actions as self-defense. Fox News host Tucker Carlson commented, “How shocked are we that 17-year-olds with rifles decided they had to maintain order when no one else would?” This version of events is false at best and permissive of murder at worst. The media’s portrayal of Rittenhouse as a hero instead of a killer indicates the deep-rooted white supremacy in our nation and further facilitates police brutality against Black individuals. Rittenhouse wasn’t the hero in this story. Huber was.
Carlson was not alone in his vile rhetoric; President Donald Trump misconstrued the narrative, claiming protesters “very violently attacked” Rittenhouse. Congressman Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.) called Rittenhouse’s actions “100% justified self defense. Do not try to take a weapon away from a man or bear the consequences.” Other conservative speakers have followed suit, with far-right commentator Ann Coulter proclaiming she wanted him as president. Rhetoric by important public figures influences the public and unfortunately depicts larger American norms. By dismissing the severity of Rittenhouse’s actions, these public figures promote unlawful and unwarranted shootings, exacerbating racial injustice.
Despite Facebook’s designation of the shooting as a “mass murder,” which company policy forbids users from openly praising or supporting, people have rallied behind Rittenhouse on Facebook and Instagram, sharing fundraisers and supportive messages on social media. In fact, one fundraiser in his support was sharedmore than 17,700 times, and posts with phrases such as “Free Kyle” have received more than 70,000 interactions. Even some college students have rallied behind Rittenhouse, with Arizona State University’s College Republicans United actively raisingmoney to support his legal defense. These social media posts prioritize the comfort of a white killer over the lives of Black folk.
When Black people are murdered by the police, Republicans’ silence is deafening. But for Kyle Rittenhouse, a white man who killed protesters, they have moved heaven and earth to defend him. This blatant disconnect reveals much about the future of the Republican party and indicates how deeply embedded white supremacy is in this country. Elevating white shooters like Rittenhouse paves the way for more monsters like him, placing more Black individuals at harm.
If you see nothing wrong with the unjust excuses and blatant justification of murder, all I have left to say is this: check your white privilege.
Brammhi Balarajan (23C) is from Las Vegas.
 
Kyle made Antifa blink, he showed everyone that they can indeed bleed and he has shown that they are not the plucky and clean Star Wars protagonist rebels they and their media toadies tried for so long to fool the low info normies into seeing them as. This is why they want his head on a pike and why they're going to move heaven and earth to see it done like we're seeing now
 
They are still under the illusion that if they just keep writing "article" after "article" about how much Kyle was the devil and his victims were angels, that it will actually become true. Its a adorable.
You're ignoring the fact that it works. There are huge amounts of people that think Kyle is some kind of atomwaffen type guy now.
 
Standard rifles and shot guns are exempt for anyone 17 and over.
View attachment 1582375
Source / Archive

View attachment 1582378 View attachment 1582384View attachment 1582387
Source / Archive Source / Archive Source / Archive



But protection of life is you mong.


The reason actually IS known, it was because Kyle put out the literal dumpster fire they started with his fire extinguisher.





So he screamed "shoot me nigga" repeatedly at a person he considered "armed and perceived as dangerous"? :story:

I enjoy how little research these people do before they take a dump on their keyboards.
Hell, even conservatives I know are getting the open carry law wrong.
 
I always think of the people that CNN didn't hire when I see this kind of stuff. Like seriously how ridiculous do you have to get before they'd hire a guy like Don Lemon over a clown like you?

I guess they hired him because he gives unsourced, badly written, obscure blogs some credibility. You and him would get on I suspect.
 
I guess they hired him because he gives unsourced, badly written, obscure blogs some credibility. You and him would get on I suspect.

I always think of Dan Soder talking about millennials when I come across this stuff.

"I think you're either a vegan, or a freelance blogger"

Probably both in this case.
 
You're ignoring the fact that it works. There are huge amounts of people that think Kyle is some kind of atomwaffen type guy now.

Yes and no. Its not working as well as it used to and they damn well know it. Why the hell you think that they are doing it over and over again? Its not a sign of strength but desperation. Besides, this whole fucking year was pretty red pilling to the masses, especially with them feeling these riots on their fucking skin and then seeing the media pretending that didnt happen.
So you are not wrong, just underestimating how things are changing now
 
Last edited:
Yes and no. Its not working as well as it used to and they damn well know it. Why the hell you think that they are doing it over and over again? Its not a sign of strength but desperation.
It's neither, it's just how the tactic works. Why stop at one article when you can give people a barrage of information they can't process? It's just gish-galloping on a massive scale.
 
All these journalists are accomplishing is that they're pissing off the general public by lying to their face, thinking that we're too stupid to see through their ruse. Journalists are going to be the first to go.
It's already unraveling on them. Americans across the board believe that the media has a fair amount or great deal of political bias (86%), that they bear a moderate to great-deal of blame for political division in the country (84%), that it's a major problem (73%) and that it's intentional (82%)
 
It's neither, it's just how the tactic works. Why stop at one article when you can give people a barrage of information they can't process? It's just gish-galloping on a massive scale.
Indeed but people are growing more and more aware of the utterly meaningless crock of shit that they spew. I guess the image that these journalist are unbiased is finally wearing off to the normie masses. Them constantly repeating over and over isnt working as well anymore. If people ignore it or outright deny it, then its for nothing.
 
In that case, my hat's off to him, you gotta have a strong stomach to sort through the literary equivalent of raw sewage in the most AIDS infested town on the globe.
"Rumors about petty issues, misinterpretations, slander. All this junk data preserved in an unfiltered state, growing at an alarming rate. It will only slow down social progress, reduce the rate of evolution.”
- The AI Colonel from MGS 2
 
Article capitalizes "black man" but not "white man".

An iota of effort to hide your bias would be appreciated.
That's the AP official style now.
Straight from AP

AP’s style is now to capitalize Black in a racial, ethnic or cultural sense, conveying an essential and shared sense of history, identity and community among people who identify as Black, including those in the African diaspora and within Africa. The lowercase black is a color, not a person. AP style will continue to lowercase the term white in racial, ethnic and cultural senses.

We also now capitalize Indigenous in reference to original inhabitants of a place.

These decisions align with long-standing capitalization of distinct racial and ethnic identifiers such as Latino, Asian American and Native American. Our discussions on style and language consider many points, including the need to be inclusive and respectful in our storytelling and the evolution of language.
 
They are still under the illusion that if they just keep writing "article" after "article" about how much Kyle was the devil and his victims were angels, that it will actually become true. Its a adorable.
Its hard to imagineer a narrative like this when the video evidence is so comprehensive. That compilation video should be Liveleak's flagship content.
No one gives a crap about blacks breaking the law every gosh damn day so why the hell shouldn't I club a liberal who writes articles like this like a baby seal when they bitch about "muh lawrs"?
Every whining about Kyle boils down to: "why do yo0u have to defend yourself when we oppress and murder you?"
I hate people.
Kyle's chaotic good was the natural endpoint of anarchy. Somebody good will eventually try to contain it, in fact if CHAZ was established anywhere red I'd expect a Kenosha or two to end it rather than its original implosion.
Black privilege is having your criminal history scrubbed and your city torched in effigy when the police try to deal with you.
White privilege is being told you suck and have the weight of the law levelled exclusively at you for defending yourself, while your aggressors get away scot-free. Ironically, the real privileged class are never anywhere near these sermons-turned-lynchings because they can afford private security
 
On Aug. 23, Jacob Blake, a Black man in Kenosha, Wisconsin, walked over to his car, where his children were waiting for him to drive them home. The police shot him in the back seven times, and until recently, he was handcuffed to his hospital bed. As protests against his unjust shooting raged on, 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse shot at several protesters, killing two, only to later be hailed as a hero by conservative media sources. The discrepancy in their treatment by law enforcement and public figures is utterly despicable.

Oh, the sweet irony.
 
Teach Pajeet not to shit on the internet.
Brammhi-Balarajan.jpeg

In fact, Rittenhouse broke the law before he even fired a shot: under Wisconsin law, it is a Class A misdemeanor for anyone under the age of 18 to openly carry a deadly weapon.
>Claims open carry is illegal
>Cites a section on exceptions to illegal concealed carry
Mein Gott, this brainlet bitch...

Additionally, while Rittenhouse claimed he considered himself a militia member trying to protect life and property, destruction of property is never a sufficient excuse for taking a life.
Property is an investment one's own life in the form of time, labor, and wealth. Killing a man over a toothbrush is less justifiable than killing a man trying to steal one's livestock or burn down a man's home, but what little shits like Brammhi is, unsurprisingly, a free-standing right to destroy and terrorize by people who, even if they were identifiable, are likely judgement-proof (unable to pay any civil judgments against them).

We used to hang horse thieves for a good reason.

Despite the fact that armed militia members, of which Rittenhouse was a part, had no legitimate reason to be at the protest that night, the police thanked them for coming and offered them water.
They were exercising their first amendment rights, sweaty. Just like the 'mostly peaceful protesters' out exercising dey first amendment rites n' shiet while masked and under cover of darkness.

Huber, one of the victims, launched himself at Rittenhouse to protect his girlfriend and the people around them, as Rittenhouse was armed and perceived as dangerous, according to Huber’s girlfriend.
Hearsay.
As protesters chased him, Rittenhouse fired his weapon four times. Even if the first shooting was an act of self-defense against a man who dived towards him with nothing more than a skateboard, it was still a massive overreaction and utterly illogical to shoot someone who did not possess a weapon.
Interesting. So if you are lying prone on the ground, as St. Kyle was, and I run up to you, while you are still prone, and attempt to bash you across the back of the skull with a five-pound weight (professional baseball bats range from around two to three pounds by comparison) then the weight in question is not a weapon, despite being used by girlfriend-beater Huber as such? Sorry sweaty, but trying to bash in someone's skull from behind is LETHAL FORCE.
As for the later shootings, it is clear that they were not a form of self-defense, as he was being pursued for then having shot someone.
Wrong on facts and law. In self-defense, each shooting has to be justified or proven criminal on its own merits. Jojo 'Rape a teen boy' Rosenbaum was shot prior to the shooting of Huber. The only other person shot after Huber was Gaige Grosskreutz, who was attempting to shoot Kyle after feigning surrender/retreat (hence, the pistol clutched in his hand after Kyle dis-armed him).

But for Kyle Rittenhouse, a white man who killed protesters, they have moved heaven and earth to defend him.
Yep, because the rioters in question tried to kill him...also known as self-defense.
 
Teach Pajeet not to shit on the internet.
View attachment 1582431

>Claims open carry is illegal
>Cites a section on exceptions to illegal concealed carry
Mein Gott, this brainlet bitch...

Property is an investment one's own life in the form of time, labor, and wealth. Killing a man over a toothbrush is less justifiable than killing a man trying to steal one's livestock or burn down a man's home, but what little shits like Brammhi is, unsurprisingly, a free-standing right to destroy and terrorize by people who, even if they were identifiable, are likely judgement-proof (unable to pay any civil judgments against them).

We used to hang horse thieves for a good reason.


They were exercising their first amendment rights, sweaty. Just like the 'mostly peaceful protesters' out exercising dey first amendment rites n' shiet while masked and under cover of darkness.

Hearsay.
Interesting. So if you are lying prone on the ground, as St. Kyle was, and I run up to you, while you are still prone, and attempt to bash you across the back of the skull with a five-pound weight (professional baseball bats range from around two to three pounds by comparison) then the weight in question is not a weapon, despite being used by girlfriend-beater Huber as such? Sorry sweaty, but trying to bash in someone's skull from behind is LETHAL FORCE. Wrong on facts and law. In self-defense, each shooting has to be justified or proven criminal on its own merits. Jojo 'Rape a teen boy' Rosenbaum was shot prior to the shooting of Huber. The only other person shot after Huber was Gaige Grosskreutz, who was attempting to shoot Kyle after feigning surrender/retreat (hence, the pistol clutched in his hand after Kyle dis-armed him).

Yep, because the rioters in question tried to kill him...also known as self-defense.
They keep pretending Joe Rosenbaum didn't bumrush Kyle. They can't quit lying by omission.
 
Back
Top Bottom