- Joined
- May 23, 2020
Levine, Neil Cuckmann and CDPR rolled into one, has decided to gift us plebs with another game. Not much yet but I thought this thread might serve as a place to comment on his other work and his legacy in general.
I like Bioshock 1 (though it has lost its awe after many replays), love Bioshock 2, and hate Bioshock Infinite. When Infinite came out, it was touted in the same way Last of Us Part 2 was. "Finally a game that was art." The Citizen Kane of game. Maybe it fucked with Levine's brain because he struggled and blew lots of other peoples money trying to make a successor to it.
But who talks about Infinite now? It's story to me, not mentioning the poorly handled politics, is nothing more than the huffing of farts. Booker is an unlikeable, I presume intentionally, lead (think Joel in the LOUP2), and Elizabeth not much better. Its narrative falls apart under the slightest scrutiny. Multi-universes seems quaint nowadays, but I think it works to its narrative detriment in spite of that. Booker's story loses all real depth when it becomes one of a vast multitude. It loses its grandeur and turns into a nihilistic, literary paradox. Others may disagree, but that's my opinion.
Bioshock 2 may have simpler story of collectivism vs individualism, but its characters are stronger (could Levine make a character with as much nuance as Sinclair?), its story meatier in its simplicity, and its discussions about the self and genetics profounder than a muh America is white supremacist.
Obligatory.
I like Bioshock 1 (though it has lost its awe after many replays), love Bioshock 2, and hate Bioshock Infinite. When Infinite came out, it was touted in the same way Last of Us Part 2 was. "Finally a game that was art." The Citizen Kane of game. Maybe it fucked with Levine's brain because he struggled and blew lots of other peoples money trying to make a successor to it.
But who talks about Infinite now? It's story to me, not mentioning the poorly handled politics, is nothing more than the huffing of farts. Booker is an unlikeable, I presume intentionally, lead (think Joel in the LOUP2), and Elizabeth not much better. Its narrative falls apart under the slightest scrutiny. Multi-universes seems quaint nowadays, but I think it works to its narrative detriment in spite of that. Booker's story loses all real depth when it becomes one of a vast multitude. It loses its grandeur and turns into a nihilistic, literary paradox. Others may disagree, but that's my opinion.
Bioshock 2 may have simpler story of collectivism vs individualism, but its characters are stronger (could Levine make a character with as much nuance as Sinclair?), its story meatier in its simplicity, and its discussions about the self and genetics profounder than a muh America is white supremacist.
Obligatory.