- Joined
- Nov 14, 2017
JBP simply isn't an asshole. He's an amiable, mild-mannered guy with incoherent ideas in his head. Gad Saad is a straight-up asshole (even if I agree with him on most things) and Sam Harris is incredibly arrogant. I'm serious when I defend JBP's personality; I disagree with him more than most of the rest by a very wide margin but I think he's straight up a decent person. JBP is actually the sort of person I used to go after the most back in the day, but I've become increasingly disenchanted with the "skeptic" (think pre-Sargon GGer stuff and more James Randi) and intellectual communities I would normally be a part of, because they do sometimes have dogmas in their own special way (see Harris's disingenuous morality). JBP does not have the qualities I loathed in the old skeptic movement, even if his ideas are infinitely dumber.The idea for this thread started exactly the same way in what I think was the Sargon thread. It wasn't my idea, I just thought it'd be worth doing.
Strange to see I agree almost to a tee with your perception of both Saad and Harris, though I wouldn't know if you've pegged Harris audience right or not.
Speaking of Harris and morality, his methods of reasoning on that aren't that far from the muddled techniques and misunderstandings of JBP. I'm pretty sure Harris has a JBP moment similar to JBP asking what he means by the definition of truth. Probably something like, "well, what does objective morality mean?"
I believe they both sincerely think they have good arguments, so I don't think Sam is willfully misleading either. He's just not as smart as he thinks he is, the fart huffer.
Out of all three Gad Saad is the biggest prick. I wouldn't be surprised if one of his grad students complained somewhere that he stole credit for some of their work, he's definitely the type.