💊 Manosphere Jordan Peterson - Internet Daddy Simulator, Post-modern Anti-postmodernist, Canadian Psychology Professor, Depressed, Got Hooked on Benzos

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Getting butt high on benzos and shitposting online is one of the world's greatest pleasures. I'm afraid, too, Dr. Peterson will relapse. He's only human after all. I also have the feeling he's secretly a coomer. (ewwww) the child porn comment didn't feel right.
Child porn comment? Did I miss something? Did he go full "non offending pedophiles"?
 
Child porn comment? Did I miss something? Did he go full "non offending pedophiles"?
jordan peterson cp.png
It was supposed to be a "joke", and I get it, everyone can have a couple of misses in their shitposting career. But still dude...
 
I'm surprised he bashes Trudeau. Upper class boomers's are Trudeau's primary voter's as his policies has made them Millionaire's from the rapid rise in real estate values across the country.
 
I'm surprised he bashes Trudeau. Upper class boomers's are Trudeau's primary voter's as his policies has made them Millionaire's from the rapid rise in real estate values across the country.
Two things:

People will frequently vote against their immediate economic/class interests because they've decided that other matters are more important in the long term. That Trudeau is a WEF puppet authoritarian who cowers before Xi Jinping, and whose regime has been a disaster for civil liberties, is a good reason to bash him.

Becoming a millionaire on paper through highly inflated property values (because your government's letting the Chinese and major investment firms buy up housing stocks) isn't much of a benefit unless you plan to sell out and move somewhere cheaper. For Peterson, it's certainly not an acceptable tradeoff for living under a government that seeks to compel speech, destroy women's sex-based rights, force compliance with a biometric security state, and that colludes with major banks to cut off access to your own money if you protest.

Second, apostrophe-s denotes possession, not plurals. It should be "boomers," "voters," and "millionaires," with no apostrophes. The apostrophe in "Trudeau's" is the only one in your comment that is correct.

I generally avoid SPAG nitpicking because we all get it wrong on occasion, but when you make the same mistake three times in a row in a short (and, frankly, not too bright) comment, fuck it; I'm going to be petty. This shit is not hard to learn.
 
Second, apostrophe-s denotes possession, not plurals. It should be "boomers," "voters," and "millionaires," with no apostrophes. The apostrophe in "Trudeau's" is the only one in your comment that is correct.

I generally avoid SPAG nitpicking because we all get it wrong on occasion, but when you make the same mistake three times in a row in a short (and, frankly, not too bright) comment, fuck it; I'm going to be petty. This shit is not hard to learn.
bro is this the internet or english class. your'e giving off L+ratio energy here and i do NOT mean it in a good way
 
TheQuartering posted a vlog about Peterson who might be worth to check.

And American Thinker also ranted about it. https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...s_insists_jordan_peterson_get_reeducated.html

January 4, 2023

The Ontario College of Psychologists insists Jordan Peterson get re-educated​

By Andrea Widburg


Jordan Peterson, a successful and respected Canadian psychologist and academic, rocketed to fame in 2016 when he took a stand against a new Canadian law that made it a criminal offense to ignore a person’s self-identified pronouns. The moment he did that, Peterson became a leftist target. The most recent and serious attack comes from the Ontario College of Psychologists (“OCP”), a government licensing organization that insists that, because Peterson challenged Canadian politicians and belittled the transgender movement, he must submit to reeducation or lose his license.
Peterson has made a name for himself over the past six years because he refuses to bow down to leftist shibboleths, whether involving transgenderism or the attack on traditional values. Despite being a psychologist, he opposes the psychology culture that says that people need to embrace their failings and demand that society must conform to them. Peterson’s book 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos, became a massive best seller because he told unhappy people that they could do the hard work of improving themselves by affirmatively becoming better, more responsible, proactive people.
The leftist establishment despises Peterson. His critiques and rules for achieving success in life threaten every bit of power they have acquired by making people feel bad about themselves, whether through becoming helpless and lonely or sexually disoriented.
I think we won't have to wait for the Ontario College of Psychologists pulling a Stonetoss and saying "Don't like our college of psychologists? Why don't you create your own college of psychologists?" :story:
 
I think we won't have to wait for the Ontario College of Psychologists pulling a Stonetoss and saying "Don't like our college of psychologists? Why don't you create your own college of psychologists?" :story:

They won't have to, because they hold all the power being the regulatory body for his profession in the province.

Regardless, something is off about this whole affair. JP simply not sharing the e-mails (even carefully selected portions) made me immediately suspicious and the Ontario College's silence probably indicates there is more to this than meets the eye. At first, I thought it had been suggested to JP by the Ontario College to take some continuing education classes on social media and being the level headed and rational man that he clearly is, took this as some kind of threat and took to Twitter like any respectable adult would as a first measure of resolution. If that had been the case, there would have been a quick and complete denial.

Also, QuaterPounder has absolutely nothing to add except another millimole of cholesterol to his cardiovascular system.
 
Unironically, Peterson should get re-educated. He should read the works of the people he criticizes for a change and stop being a lazy, whimpering charlatan. But you know how it goes with addicts.
 
Yeah he's not complying with that. The big baby will cry "woooooooooke". Buh bye to your official psychologist license JP. But it's not like he needs it to support his income at this point. It's still going to bother him emotionally to lose that because it'll feed into his persecution complex (people are out to get me).

He's going to flip out and cry over this on camera and claim the demonic Internet trolls had some kind of implication in all of this and that he's being attacked.
 
Last edited:
That's nonsense! Post your full name, address and phone number right now you Machiavelli troll Coward!
2cuC2fCM9jUU5cbL.mp4

Forgot to include this guy in my New years predictions, He will relapse on the Xanax and his daughter will indefinitely be on Maury.
He's actually on to something here, but he seems to think that social pressure is the only thing to filter your speech when your name is attached to everything you say, ignoring the persecution you would face in every facet of your life from the government and corporations more so than social consequences. Which is ironic in light of the very next post being about his mandatory re-education for daring to say something that a large organization finds subversive. I also liked the part where Jordan accurately describes himself alone in his bedroom, isolated, spewing toxicity about the "demons" and de-humanizing those dirty trolls. He then advocates for a top-down authoritarian system of identification, which would definitely be used purely for categorization and won't be used to censor and persecute people like in every other top-down authoritarian system that exists in every other facet of life.

Has anyone dissected Maps Of Meaning? Here's something I found interesting in the first chapter, which might be enlightening as to how Jordan thinks.

At the same time, something odd was happening to my ability to converse. I had always enjoyed engaging in arguments, regardless of topic. I regarded them as a sort of game (not that this is in any way unique). Suddenly, however, I couldn’t talk—more accurately, I couldn’t stand listening to myself talk. I started to hear a “voice” inside my head, commenting on my opinions. Every time I said something, it said something— something critical. The voice employed a standard refrain, delivered in a somewhat bored and matter-of-fact tone:

You don’t believe that.
That isn’t true.
You don’t believe that.
That isn’t true.

The “voice” applied such comments to almost every phrase I spoke.

I couldn’t understand what to make of this. I knew the source of the commentary was part of me, but this knowledge only increased my confusion. Which part, precisely, was me—the talking part or the criticizing part? If it was the talking part, then what was the criticizing part? If it was the criticizing part—well, then: how could virtually everything I said be untrue? In my ignorance and confusion, I decided to experiment. I tried only to say things that my internal reviewer would pass unchallenged. This meant that I really had to listen to what I was saying, that I spoke much less often, and that I would frequently stop, midway through a sentence, feel embarrassed, and reformulate my thoughts. I soon noticed that I felt much less agitated and more confident when I only said things that the “voice” did not object to. This came as a definite relief. My experiment had been a success; I was the criticizing part. Nonetheless, it took me a long time to reconcile myself to the idea that almost all my thoughts weren’t real, weren’t true—or, at least, weren’t mine.

All the things I “believed” were things I thought sounded good, admirable, respectable, courageous. They weren’t my things, however—I had stolen them. Most of them I had taken from books. Having “understood” them, abstractly, I presumed I had a right to them—presumed that I could adopt them, as if they were mine: presumed that they were me. My head was stuffed full of the ideas of others; stuffed full of arguments I could not logically refute. I did not know then that an irrefutable argument is not necessarily true, nor that the right to identify with certain ideas had to be earned.

I read something by Carl Jung, at about this time, that helped me understand what I was experiencing. It was Jung who formulated the concept of persona: the mask that “feigned individuality.”3 Adoption of such a mask, according to Jung, allowed each of us—and those around us—to believe that we were authentic. Jung said:

When we analyse the persona we strip off the mask, and discover that what seemed to be individual is at bottom collective; in other words, that the persona was only a mask of the collective psyche. Fundamentally the persona is nothing real: it is a compromise between individual and society as to what a man should appear to be. He takes a name, earns a title, exercises a function, he is this or that. In a certain sense all this is real, yet in relation to the essential individuality of the person concerned it is only a secondary reality, a compromise formation, in making which others often have a greater share than he. The persona is a semblance, a twodimensional reality, to give it a nickname.4

Despite my verbal facility, I was not real. I found this painful to admit.

I began to dream absolutely unbearable dreams. My dream life, up to this point, had been relatively uneventful, as far as I can remember; furthermore, I have never had a particularly good visual imagination. Nonetheless, my dreams became so horrible and so emotionally gripping that I was often afraid to go to sleep. I dreamt dreams vivid as reality. I could not escape from them or ignore them. They circulated, in general, around a single theme: that of nuclear war, and total devastation—around the worst evils that I, or something in me, could imagine
 
Could it just be they are revidioning hius psychology degree not for one dumb post but for all the alternative non scientific stuff he promoted and practiced?
all meat diet, being unconscious for a year in Serbia, having lactures where he disregards basic scientific and histrorical data so he can peddle his theories etc?
 
Could it just be they are revidioning hius psychology degree not for one dumb post but for all the alternative non scientific stuff he promoted and practiced?
all meat diet, being unconscious for a year in Serbia, having lactures where he disregards basic scientific and histrorical data so he can peddle his theories etc?
It's social media communication retraining. Whatever that means. But it is surely possible. A lot of the sciency types are in fact into alternative shit, but probably none of them was so controversial and had such a large following as Peterson. Though that never stopped Deepak Chopra. Perhaps many practicing clinicians and higher education people from College of Ontario were tired of being associated with Peterson professionally through their degree. That could also be a factor, maybe.

Edit: Holy molly, it appears Peterson was picked as a villain for a hollywood movie and guess what, it made him cry.
 
Last edited:
It's social media communication retraining. Whatever that means. But it is surely possible. A lot of the sciency types are in fact into alternative shit, but probably none of them was so controversial and had such a large following as Peterson. Though that never stopped Deepak Chopra. Perhaps many practicing clinicians and higher education people from College of Ontario were tired of being associated with Peterson professionally through their degree. That could also be a factor, maybe.

Edit: Holy molly, it appears Peterson was picked as a villain for a hollywood movie and guess what, it made him cry.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=dBhxUHXyJUM:95

It is kind of funny that Don't Worry Darling tried so hard to be like Jordan Peele's work, but as Jared pointed out in his video, it's guilty of doing the same sins they (as in the general left which I imagine Olivia Wilde is part of) accuse Peterson of doing.
 
Back
Top Bottom