💪 Tough Guys Jim Stewartson / Stewanon - Cuck Francis E. Dec, Fredrick Brennan's #1 hadur, schizo substack scribe, everyone I don't like is Qanon, convinced Lt General Mike Flynn is Q, got sued for it, doxed himself burning a C&D, denounced by the ADL, TDS sufferer, AIDS appreciator

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Patel v. Stewartson 2:23-cv-00873 — District Court, D. Nevada

  • Docket No.
    2:23-cv-00873
  • Court
    District Court, D. Nevada
  • Filed
    Jun 2, 2023
  • Terminated
    Aug 4, 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    320 Assault Libel & Slander
  • Cause
    Civil Miscellaneous Case
  • Jurisdiction
    Diversity
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    May 17, 2026

Parties (3)

Parties
Jim Stewartson, Kashyap Patel, The Kash Foundation, Inc.

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 32)

# Date Description Filing
57 May 17, 2026  
56 May 17, 2026  
55 May 3, 2026 RESPONSE to 53 Order on Motion to Dismiss,,, Order on Motion to Set Aside,,,,, by Defendant Jim Stewartson. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Jim Stewartson)(Wolpert, Leo) (Entered: 05/04/2026)
54 May 3, 2026 RESPONSE to 53 Order on Motion to Dismiss,,, Order on Motion to Set Aside,,,,, by Plaintiffs Kashyap Patel, The Kash Foundation, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Jared J. Roberts)(Roberts, Jared) (Entered: 05/04/2026) 1
53 Apr 18, 2026 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Jim Stewartson's 43 motion to set aside the default judgment is DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Jim Stewartson's 42 motion to dismiss is DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are directed to submit supplemental briefing, limited to ten pages, on the issues identified above per the following schedule: (1) the parties' simultaneous opening briefs are due May 4, 2026, and their (2) simultaneous response briefs are due May 18, 2026. Signed by Chief Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/19/2026. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AMMi) (Entered: 04/20/2026) 1
ICANTDELETEYOURMENTIONWTAF

I personally have 13 bitcoin assassins in my skype group who are waiting for the signal so they can push Jim into a locker, pants him, and give him a power sit-up. I trust the plan and have removed my tinfoil hat so I can receive Flynn's messages through OAN broadcasts.
Extraordinarily based

EDIT: I just spoke to the Redondo Beach police department and there was a call to 1526 Steinhart Ave back in May. They told me that they can’t tell me over the phone the reason for the call, but I could file a request to get a copy of the call itself, which I will be doing.
Try to get this before Josh gets the Rekieta shit so I can make fun of him and call him a fake FOIA'er. But in all seriousness if the fuzz got a call to go to Jim's house its 1000% Jackie doing this and Jim is in on it. I can't see any of the anti Jim people bothering to do this. They sit on twitter just like Jim.

Since Jarvis is the one to reveal this just means Jim talks directly to Jarvis and that means that the tens of thousands of defamatory comments against everyone Jim has knowledge of and may even be directing. I can't wait to hear this phone call. Since Jarvis is heavy into ai (mostly generating sexual images of children), if we get an ai voice on the line its definitely him.
 
Holy **** this man is the Alex Jones of never trump Republicans
He’s allegedly a Democrat but he’s so fucking whacky that he doesn’t really have a political stance. Jim will go with whatever gets him attention. I think he’s a conspiracy dork first and foremost.
just spoke to the Redondo Beach police department and there was a call to 1526 Steinhart Ave back in May. They told me that they can’t tell me over the phone the reason for the call, but I could file a request to get a copy of the call itself, which I will be doing.
Looking forward to hearing this call and reading the incident report. The fact that Jim said nothing about this is quite sussy. And would anyone be surprised if he had Jackie do this because he concocted some master plan to use it as an excuse to drag people into his lawsuit? I could easily see Jim thinking:

“All of these ‘Flynn operatives’ have left me alone irl but I need an excuse to depose them. Hmmm today I will SWAT myself and then subpoena them”
IMG_9040.jpeg

Also he looks like complete shit. I know Ralph called him an AIDS appreciator jokingly in the title but the mfer looks full-on Philadelphia Tom Hanks lately.
 
Jim gets community noted for being a lying sack of shit on a tweet from over a year ago. He is not appreciative of the cyber bulling from suicide trolls to this day.
06-24-23 Rosanne denies the holocaust.png
Which led to today's tantrum
07-21-24 Rosanne still denies the holocaust.png
"Who you gonna believe? Your lying eyes or me telling you that the government is trying to kill me using cyber bulling in this hot, psychological, civil, cold war?"
 
Jim gets community noted for being a lying sack of shit on a tweet from over a year ago.
Ha! That just got Community Noted recently? Literally every tweet of his should be Community Noted since they’re all bullshit and it will affect his earnings.

Which led to today's tantrum
Does Twitter alert you if you’re community noted? They must. I can’t believe he’s spending time going over his own tweets that far back. He loves to sniff his own farts but he produces too much to have caught this just scrolling through his own shit.

Also this is why he blocks so many people at the first sign of disagreement. If they community note him, his earnings suffer. So it’s a double benefit. You can keep debunkers out of your thread and it protects earnings and keeps your dumb cult in line
 
He’s allegedly a Democrat but he’s so fucking whacky that he doesn’t really have a political stance. Jim will go with whatever gets him attention. I think he’s a conspiracy dork first and foremost.
Yeah the shit he says is so off the wall that most of his trolls and haters come from the left as opposed to the right.

He is the kind of liberal that wants to defend the police, but still expects them to curbstomp any homeless that stumble into his neighborhood.
 
JIM HAS CUCKED ON HIS ONLY BIDEN POSITION!
07-21-24 Cuck Stewartson pt1.PNG 1721585384195.png
07-21-24 Cuck Stewartson pt2.PNG
07-21-24 Cuck Stewartson pt3.PNG
Jim has spent the entirety of the time between Biden's horrible performance against Trump at the debate till yesterday calling ANYONE who dared say that Biden should step down a chickenshit traitor who wants to give America over to Drumpf's Fourth Reich, or to use his far more eloquent wording: Bedwetters. This dying from AIDS looking mother fucker abso-fucking-lutely cucked. You are a cuck Jim and you are very dumb. You suck Jim. Trumpamania is running wild!

EDIT:
Jim threatens any other dems who dare challenge Kamala for her bequeathed nomination.
07-21-24 Jim threatens.PNG
Jim videotapes himself repeating that last tweet.
07-21-24 Jim is so excited that he's crying.png

Pause at any point in the video and Jim looks like he's one the verge of tears probably because he is.
1721588105406.png

Get fucked and the dress wearing gimp you rode in on.
 
Last edited:
Pause at any point in the video and Jim looks like he's one the verge of tears probably because he is.
Haha holy fucking shit this guy is a bigger fag than Harry Sisson and he does it all for free. I’m starting to think that Jim has a humiliation fetish. No man acts like this for so long without some self reflection and adjustment.
 
Jim is too tired to continue to support America's number one cock sucking cop so he goes the easy route, talking about Flynn!
07-21-24 Flynn's holocaust.PNG
>Trump uses an incredibly widely used phrase
>3.5 years later Mike Flynn uses the same exact a similar incredibly widely used phrase
>Holocaust
lol

EDIT:
I'm a retard and had read the Trump and Flynn parts as saying the same exact thing when, in fact, they did not according to Jim. That's how stupid Jim's logic is, my brain rearranged his wording so it made some kind of sense instead of Jim's one connecting fact being they both said the word "wild" once.
 
Last edited:
Jim hands himself the ultimate L.

Just before Biden made the announcement, Jim was taking a victory lap for defeating the “Pass the Torch” people. The timing on this is so epic. How is this guy so bad at all of this?

Billionaires and Oligarchs 1

Jim Stewartson 0

IMG_9110.jpeg


“This one was posted an hour before the news broke. He went like straight from this to "Vote Kamala and Buttigieg or there will be a Revolution™" without skipping a beat. It fucking rules.”

IMG_9111.jpeg


I’m just gonna Nitter + Nitter archive these two in a single url. They are both viewable together on the same screen in the links below


 
When RadPod ran last Friday I stopped watching about two minutes in because of their glorious tech fuckups and Jim's dress wearing gimp, Josh Fidel, blaming all their problems on tech issues with...twitter updating it's software. Assuming the gimp isn't lying or massively confused, I have no fucking idea how they run their stream. I did go back to listen to it today and I am very glad I did. This is some primo kino cope and sneed that came a little more than a day and a half before Joe Biden said "Fuck y'all. I'm outta here!" so it aged so very, very poorly. I highly recommend you listen to this one in another tab because even the shit the gimp has visuals for do not matter. 10/10 coping, seething, schizo goodness.
1721687896682.png
Which one is the real troon?

Highlights!
  • Jim raging at people who tell Biden to step down a day and half before he supported Biden stepping down and biting Kamala clit.
  • The Wine Hag thinking the phrase "Untied we stand. Divided we fall" was invented by some civil rights guy she once talked to.
  • The Wine Hag saying that a week before, Biden had a great rally in Detroit where he made it clear that he wasn't stepping down and that the people of Detroit said "we got your back".
  • The Wine Hag being upset that no one was talking about the great rally in Detroit because of "what happens the next day, you know, high school shooting at a rally and, uh, obviously Trump sucks all the life out of the room as he always does and everybody's focusing on that incident and they forget that there was a rally a week ago today where not only did he promise he wasn't dropping out but everybody in Detroit was like we got back and it's exactly what we needed after the few weeks that we've been through". Yes the attempted assassination of Donald J Trump is high school shooting at a rally. Fucking LOL.
  • Jim states very awkwardly that what's happening in America isn't politics
    "and the reason is because politics requires compromise. That's what it is, right? It is about two parties sitting down and agreeing on something. Which means that the per the the part party on the other side of the table has to be trust...able"
    He actually freezes up at the end of "trust" for almost a whole second and just tacks on "able" when he could've just said trustworthy like a normal, not crazy, not stupid person.
  • He follows that up with fucking up yet another very basic phrase.
    "at least leverageable, right? There is none of that. Norms...your fucking, like, belly...button gazing"
    You stupid ass, AIDS looking dipshit. The term is "navel gazing", you low IQ dumbass.
  • The gimp gets tries to cut in several times and gets shut down each time.
  • JD Vance is a robot programmed by Peter Theil.
  • About 10 minutes of impossible to follow, inane babbling about Peter Theil, his cult, and somebody wanting to create a king.
  • A quote from someone who said that democracy failed when women got the right to vote that gets associated with JD Vance proving that Just Dance Vance is a true and honest gamer.
  • The dress wearing gimp clarifies who the people who are telling Joe Biden to step down are
    "um uh it's not just old white men. It's old, rich, white men"
    1721689505237.png
    To which Jim has to clarify that #NotAllWhteGuys because he is old, rich, and he is white.
  • The Wine Hag gleans us this nugget of wisdom about how Biden will win.
    "It's a lot of fear. It's a lot of fear and what I know because I feel like I've been on this planet now 60 years and I feel like I know my country reasonably well and I believe that Joe Biden allowed to continue and continue campaigning will beat Donald Trump in bigger numbers than before because fewer people in like Trump now than they did in 2020 more people uh there are fewer people I believe and I I believe that he will win"
 
Jake Hanrahan, the creator of Popular Front Podcast, has bestowed upon Jim the crown of Libtard Infowars. IMG_9121.jpeg



Jim will be calling Jake “controlled opposition” any minute now. Does Jim know that Nezumi Ningen is cool with both Jake and Doug S? Because he’s going to blow his fucking top and I’m here for the glory.

The dress wearing gimp clarifies who the people who are telling Joe Biden to step down are
"um uh it's not just old white men. It's old, rich, white men"
Thanks fatboy. You really add so much to the national dialogue, Josh. Fucking incel gimp
 
The Flynn case apparently received some updates including appeals. I am uploading everything (from the first image) as one doc. Reply (appellate) briefs added except Flynn's "initial" brief which is not available
Screenshot_20240723_052300_Firefox.jpg
Screenshot_20240723_052629_Firefox.jpg
Screenshot_20240723_052723_Firefox.jpg
Appellate docket:
Screenshot_20240723_052956_Firefox.jpg
Screenshot_20240723_053205_Firefox.jpg
 

Attachments

Last edited:
The Flynn case apparently received some updates including appeals. I am uploading everything (from the first image) as one doc. Reply (appellate) briefs added except Flynn's "initial" brief which is not available
Thanks for doing this. I mistakenly thought Wilson was out of the case. If I’m reading this correctly, is Flynn basically arguing against the dismissal under Anti-SLAPP?

I’m also a little confused by the oral arguments happening in Sept but the trial being scheduled for March 2025 (in Clerk pdf)

I’m assuming they make those initial oral arguments first and then the 2025 trial date is set in stone? In other words, oral arguments first to the judge, then trial by jury?

IMG_9130.jpeg

IMG_9129.jpeg

Also, do the oral arguments for Wilson and Stewartson happen on the same day and same session?

Sorry to bombard you with so many questions and treat you like the Kiwi Nancy Grace. I’m not great with court stuff.
 
I mistakenly thought Wilson was out of the case.
He is, but Flynn appealed that, and they are now arguing over whether the initial decision was correct. The oral argument about that is due September 10th.
I’m also a little confused by the oral arguments happening in Sept but the trial being scheduled for March 2025 (in Clerk pdf)
Oral arguments are for the appeal. Trial is for the lower level.
Also, do the oral arguments for Wilson and Stewartson happen on the same day and same session?
It is my understanding that the oral arguments relate solely to the Wilson question on appeal (i.e. whether he was properly dismissed from the case)
 
He is, but Flynn appealed that, and they are now arguing over whether the initial decision was correct. The oral argument about that is due September 10th.
Ok awesome. Thank you for the clarification

It is my understanding that the oral arguments relate solely to the Wilson question on appeal (i.e. whether he was properly dismissed from the case)
That makes sense. Still, I’m going to try and tune in for that. It might give us some insight into how the court handles these things and what’s in store for Jim. I know that the court staff (clerks office) is very familiar with the case. So this may be a big deal for them.

Oral arguments are for the appeal. Trial is for the lower level.
Perfect. So Jims proceeds in 2025 unless he decides to settle or Flynn withdraws.

But…what if Wilson loses the appeal? Does the 03/2025 date just proceed with him back on the docket?
 
Still, I’m going to try and tune in for that.
But…what if Wilson loses the appeal? Does the 03/2025 date just proceed with him back on the docket?
I don't believe so. I think they'd have to have another case managing conference. As per both parties contend, this lawsuit proceeds slowly as is, and then there's "intensive and protracted discovery" with boatload of motions they anticipate. I can't see the deadline being in any way viable with an additional party.
 
Back
Top Bottom