(((Jewish))) conspiracy thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter AF 802
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
How is it a Jewish conspiracy and not a Jewish Fact.

Considering the amount of representation, nepotism, and hard work ethic involved why don't the powerful Jews in the world band together to make it a better place for everyone? Because they are racist and they believe the same tribal dogmas that they denigrate others for following. They do this because physically they're weak and will never win a battle through strength, we know this as true because of hundreds of years of them getting kicked around the globe.

They are no different from us, they are unified spiritually and physically by the pursuit of a Jewish Ethnostate. There may be many Jews oblivious to the more nefarious plans, but you can't tell me even the lowliest of Jews wouldn't consider the end game favorable to them so why oppose it.

If all debt was paid back money would cease to exist and we would still be indebted because of interest. So you remain forever indebted to the Synagogue of Satan to do his bidding. That is the state of the globe right now and everyone who owes money to the World Bank or the IMF i.e. every single country.
 
You think the topic doesn't deserve it.

What value would there be in either of us saying anything at that point?

I think the topic of whether or not there exists a concerted Jewish conspiracy to dominate the world isn't worth discussing. This doesn't mean that I think the topic of what motivates people to believe such a thing isn't. Understanding that is very important, because the historical consequences of not doing so have proven to be devastating.

Considering the amount of representation, nepotism, and hard work ethic involved why don't the powerful Jews in the world band together to make it a better place for everyone?

Israel spends more on research and development as a percentage of GDP than any other country on the planet, and among the Nobel Laureates for contributions to science and medicine, Jews are disproportionately represented by a factor of 13000%. Do you think this hasn't contributed to the betterment of mankind?
 
I think the topic of whether or not there exists a concerted Jewish conspiracy to dominate the world isn't worth discussing. This doesn't mean that I think the topic of what motivates people to believe such a thing isn't. Understanding that is very important, because the historical consequences of not doing so have proven to be devastating.

Why are you only interested in hearing one side?

If for example you look at the jewish instigated holodomor, that resulted in millions of european christian deaths, can we only discuss what motivates people to believe such a thing isn't? Or is it worth looking at the full picture and each side?
 
Israel spends more on research and development as a percentage of GDP than any other country on the planet, and among the Nobel Laureates for contributions to science and medicine, Jews are disproportionately represented by a factor of 13000%. Do you think this hasn't contributed to the betterment of mankind?

NO. Absolutely NOT, for whatever betterment of mankind you believe they contributed to I don't see it when they disproportionately contribute to the death of mankind spiritually and physically indirectly. What are these contributions that they have made and how have the contributions gained a net positive effect for mankind when weighed with the power they -the jews - have to end much of human suffering?

6 million Jews allegedly died during the Holocaust.

How many Russians died directly or indirectly under Jewish Bolshevism excluding the murder of the Royal Family? 10's of millions - orders of magnitude more.

Think for yourself, question authority. Why are 6 million alleged lives more important than the hundreds of millions of lives and blood on Jewish hands throughout history?
 
Why are you only interested in hearing one side?

I'm not only interested in hearing one side. I simply think that one side is right and the other is wrong, and I know which side I'm on.

If for example you look at the jewish instigated holodomor . . .

This is a great illustration of why there is little use in arguing with you people. By saying that the Holodomor genocide was "Jewish instigated" you are already framing the subject to suit your conclusions, which should be an indication to everyone that you already have your mind made up. You are here to proselytize, not enlighten.

NO. Absolutely NOT, for whatever betterment of mankind you believe they contributed to I don't see it when they disproportionately contribute to the death of mankind spiritually and physically indirectly.

What is this 'spiritual' and 'physical' death you speak of? And in what way does it measurably outweigh Jewish contributions to science and medicine? This right here is a perfect illustration of the kind of rhetorical tricks employed by antisemitic crackpots. When the facts disagree with you, you just make vague illusions to something sinister sounding.

How many Russians died directly or indirectly under Jewish Bolshevism excluding the murder of the Royal Family?

Why are 6 million alleged lives more important than the hundreds of millions of lives and blood on Jewish hands throughout history?

I can't be expected to give straight answers to such crooked questions. I will simply say that the assumptions which underlie your questions are unfounded, and you look like a crackpot for asking them.
 
I'm not only interested in hearing one side. I simply think that one side is right and the other is wrong, and I know which side I'm on.

This is a great illustration of why there is little use in arguing with you people. By saying that the Holodomor genocide was "Jewish instigated" you are already framing the subject to suit your conclusions, which should be an indication to everyone that you already have your mind made up. You are here to proselytize, not enlighten.

Right, which is exactly why I framed it that way. I was looking for a situation that would be mirror image of your position and now you're blaming me for having already argued it from completed conclusions. You know, like you were doing just before?

Now you know what it looks like to other people when you talk about a topic where you are unwilling to even entertain the idea that you might have incomplete information.

You just argued for me why there is no use to talk about this subject with you... at least not unless you're willing to approach it with an open mind instead of a closed one. As you said: "You are here to proselytize, not enlighten."
 
Last edited:
Right, which is exactly why I framed it that way. I was looking for a situation that would be mirror image of your position and now you're blaming me for having already argued it from completed conclusions. You know, like you were doing just before?

Now you know what it looks like to other people when you talk about a topic where you are unwilling to even entertain the idea that you might have incomplete information.

You just argued for me why there is no use to talk about this subject with you... at least not unless you're willing to approach it with an open mind instead of a closed one.

There is no equivalence between our positions. Your position is one built upon unsubstantiated conspiracy theories. My position stands as a forthright rejection of such conspiracies. You have provided no evidence for your assertion that the Holodomor genocide was "instigated" by the Jewish people.

Also, let me reiterate: there is a difference between being open-minded and accepting things mindlessly. Me not being convinced by your claims doesn't convict me of being intellectually dishonest or close-minded. The burden is upon you to demonstrate the validity of your claims, and I haven't seen you do that.
 
The burden is upon you to demonstrate the validity of your claims, and I haven't seen you do that.

I think the burden is on everyone to take responsibility to create the most accurate worldview they can for themselves. I also agree with you that there is a huge difference between an open mind and agreeing with things mindlessly and that there is value in making sure you do the former.

We've already established clearly there is no point continuing this conversation though. No matter the quality of my evidence, you've said it yourself: You will not give the topic serious thought.

I don't think any type of evidence would sway you. I'd ask you what type of evidence hypothetically would, but then you would have to give the topic serious thought which you've already said you wouldn't.
 
Last edited:
I'm not only interested in hearing one side. I simply think that one side is right and the other is wrong, and I know which side I'm on.

This is a great illustration of why there is little use in arguing with you people. By saying that the Holodomor genocide was "Jewish instigated" you are already framing the subject to suit your conclusions, which should be an indication to everyone that you already have your mind made up. You are here to proselytize, not enlighten.

What is this 'spiritual' and 'physical' death you speak of? And in what way does it measurably outweigh Jewish contributions to science and medicine? This right here is a perfect illustration of the kind of rhetorical tricks employed by antisemitic crackpots. When the facts disagree with you, you just make vague illusions to something sinister sounding.

I can't be expected to give straight answers to such crooked questions. I will simply say that the assumptions which underlie your questions are unfounded, and you look like a crackpot for asking them.

"Read a book nigger" Seriously, there are hundreds of books exposing specific groups and specific Jews throughout history all well researched and better than you will ever get in a one sided forum discussion.

Start with Two Hundred Years Together by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

It's not my obligation to enlighten you.
 

Attachments

  • fallaciesposter.png
    fallaciesposter.png
    5.2 MB · Views: 190
Last edited:
Tell me more please. I wish to hear more of your thoughts on the Jewish Conspiracy. Who cares about ratings anyway?

For anyone reading this thread with more curiosity and propensity to serious thought, you might want to read Ron Unz. He's jewish. The ADL have confirmed that he isn't anti-semitic, which is unusual for an organization that throws that statement every time someone farts in the general direction of a jewish person. Don't read this if you are afraid of having your mind changed:

http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/

On the plus side it probably won't turn you into a raging anti-semite, since if you find it convincing, you will have learned it from a jew (after being directed to it by a partial jew).
 
Last edited:
"Read a book nigger" Seriously, there are hundreds of books exposing specific groups and specific Jews throughout history all well researched and better than you will ever get in a one sided forum discussion.

Start with Two Hundred Years Together by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

It's not my obligation to enlighten you.
"It's not my job to educate you, shitlord!"
Also lol at you posting the image from the /pol/ sticky when /pol/ commits logical fallacies like they were going out of style.
 
I don't know why but it seems every Jew at my college (small college or about 6-8k) knows each other. Jews must be really good at networking. Like one time I attended a school Chabad and like 50 people were there despite it being a small event
 
Jews have a culture which emphasizes hard work and education. This alone is enough to explain why they're disproportionately represented in several prestigious areas of society. Another reason might be nepotism, but this wouldn't be enough to explain how they have been able to consistently sustain their success over time.
If the jews were hard-working there would have been a super massive empire comparable to that of the Roman or ottoman empire. The jew is wealthy because he is able to take tax payer money from other nations.
 
Back
Top Bottom