- Joined
- Nov 28, 2014
Some of what you posted is exaggerations or outright fabrications used by various nationalists. Why would Serb, Sikh, and Hindu nationalists be any more reliable sources than all the Islamophile PR agents? Did Muslims kill people in the Balkans and India and frequently take slaves? Yes. Did they rule it for hundreds of years? Yes. Was it "centuries of darkness and mass murder and colonization?" Not really, unless you're like many of these writers and the sources they cite where they appear to be very selective about their primary sources due to their political affiliation.
You appear to be quoting Sikh extremist websites there. Hindus and Sikhs often have a massive grudge against Islam for historical reasons, far more than anyone white does outside the Balkans; India is currently ruled by the Hindu nationalist BJP. Obviously the Muslim empires killed a lot of people in India over the years (it's unusual that an empire doesn't), but it's not really fair to compare the deaths of many wars and acts over centuries to the atrocities of World War 2, which happened in only 6 years and would have been much worse if the Axis had won.
Timur was horrifying, though. 17 million died from his campaigns, all with 14th century technology, almost as many as died in World War 1.
I should have noted that some of the sites I posted are highly biased but quote primary/reliable sources. I tried not to include anything that didn’t include citations. I also tried to find non-biased articles, but honestly it’s pretty difficult. If either of you know of any better articles or resources I could read I’d appreciate it.
Yes, those articles were written by Serbian/Hindu nationalists, but they’re like the only people who talk about the topic of Islamic imperialism. Most people who know about it either gloss over it or outright whitewash it.