- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
A total of 11 deaths since 1993. Obviously they're still deaths, but they're not remotely comparable in scope or character.
Islamophiles / Regressive Left - Liberal non-Muslims who are desperate to protect the Religion of Peace
- Thread starter Cosmos
- Start date
-
🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
A total of 11 deaths since 1993. Obviously they're still deaths, but they're not remotely comparable in scope or character.
As I said before I don't classify folks by their ideas but behavior.
Bombing an abortion Clinic.
Bombing skeptics who question the quran.
Shutting down a gay Jews event to prevent him preaching "nazism"
A tard is a tard no matter what.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2015
What if their behavior is encouraged by their ideas? Like every person in existence goes by their ideas.
The hottie guy in my avatar kept saying "We should commit suicide when the aliens give me a sign guys" and it worked on them because it was an idea implanted in their head by a crazy person
So a guy telling you to commit suicide when the aliens give him a sign = A bad idea that encourages bad behavior
Radical Islam encouraging the idea that little girls should be married to 30+ year old smelly men and you should behead those who smoke weed is also a bad idea that encourages behavior. Saudi Arabia loves this shit dude.
Last edited:
I think it the other way around. Let talk about Mohammed. He was a politician who wanted power. Everything else came second. So he structured his ideas to appeal to tards. It was super effective.
A pattern common in ideas that appeal to tards is finding someone to blame.
In Islam is the infidel.
Nazism it's the Jew.
Christianity it's the heretic.
Antifa its any one who disagrees with them.
Ideas that cause the most harm and most profit to the creator are tailored specifically to appeal to tards cause they form the majority of the population.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2015
Ok but this is the Islam thread for how much Islam sucks-- and you gotta admit, right now, Islam sucks more than anything else when it comes to radical ideas put into practice.
Nazis now in days aren't really Nazis-- the guy hitting the chick at a retard rally was as bad as it gets. It's not the 40s with Jew gasing.
Christians aren't going around trying to convert heathens on a massive level with threats of violence anymore. You had to refer to 90s cases that were few in comparison to the frequency of Islamic attacks in Europe.
Antifa sucks balls and it's a slippery slope-- they also love Islam btw-- not gonna argue there, but they aren't a MASSIVE threat yet.
So yeah. I don't know what you're trying to accomplish with these posts.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2016
Apparently last I heard, there's a muslim group in Swedish parliament, not sure if true but...If so, how long till Sharia.
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2016
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2017
Because history classes teach fuck all about Middle Eastern history (beyond the obligatory early Mesopotamian civilizations), so they only know how bad Christianity was in Europe.
You're right about the thread focus about Islam sucks. I'll try keep on topic
As for what I am trying to accomplish is explain my world view. I do not like the left nor right. I'm getting sick and tired
of both sides pressuring me to pick a side when both seem like bad news to me.
So I am trying to figure out what makes the ideas the same and what makes the followers the same.
M
MG 192
Guest
kiwifarms.net
Muslims are butthurt because Guan Yu is a much better god than Allah will ever be and that Chinese mythology is infinitely more interesting than two sets of batshit crazy holy texts and a biography telling us (from a Muslim scholar) that Muhammad was a violent, sexist warlord who cannot take criticism.
There is a disproportional amount of focus on European history in World History, likely because the United States and Canada are primarily-English speakers with maybe sprinkles of ancient and Asian Civilizations. Classes may as well be teaching "European History".
Even if classes do teach Middle Eastern history, it would likely be biased in favor of Islam. The only way to teach history is to be neutral about it and with how censored discussions on Islam is, that makes a hard task more difficult.
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2015
You sure? I can't find one with official representation in government. Maybe you are thinking of the Green Party, they are pretty tolerate towards Muslim issues.
On that note it is surprisingly easy to form a political party in Sweden. This guy has one devoted to sex dolls and autistic rights:
http://www.val.se/val/val2014/valsedlar/K/kommun/12/87/valsedlar.html#d1171
NIA-DOA 2.0
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2013
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2015
Not to be a jerk (but I'm gonna be a jerk) you still aren't getting it. This thread is talking about the Lefties because it is almost exclusively a lefty trait to defend Islam no matter how bad it is. Even if not all left wingers do it. We aren't saying that Right or Left is better in politics-- but rather how the Left handles Islam in today's social media and also in the news outlets.
The Valeyard
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2017
IT'S THAT SIMPLE
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2017
Let's answer the question of why the left cuddles Islam. I mean why would a political ideal that is anti theist, supports gay right, pro women would allow a group that the opposite of that in their ranks?
I have three theories.
The first theory is corruption. I hear rumors the Saudis give politicians funding for their campaigns. Clinton being a good example. The leadership in turn pushes the "fighting Islamaphophia" to give their corruption a moral veneer. The sjws being the dumb shits they are gooble this up and get pissy when told it's due to corruption.
The second theory is the left sees the enemy of my enemy as my friend. They think they will be able to erase or alter Muslims' identity and install a new one over time. This is a dangerous game.
The third theory the left is using Islamists as a monkey paw. Allow loads of them to immigrate, let them cause chaos which would make the electorate demand a police state. The leftists will oblige and go full Stalin once police state is installed. Any one who can give the new state trouble will be annihilated including their former Muslim allies.
Those are my theories.
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2016
First theory is correct.
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2014
I sure hope that when she says hate speech, she's including fundamentalist imams/other Muslim radicals who preach hatred and intolerance against Christians, Jews, atheists, Westerners, homosexuals, empowered women, the "wrong type" of Muslims, and so on. They brainwash people into believing that everyone who doesn't belong to their sect and follow their insane rules is less than fully human, and that peaceful coexistence with them is not only impossible but a mortal sin against Allah.
Also, if someone tries to tell you that terrorism is primarily motivated by revenge against the West for its abuse of Muslim countries, remind them that most victims of terrorism are other Muslims and other indigenous populations in the Middle East (Christians, Yazidis, etc). They're killed because their mere existence is an affront to radical Muslims, who believe that only other radical Muslims have the right to happiness and security.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2017
You are seriously overthinking this. The left, or at least the part of the left that supports this lunacy, is totally devoid of ideological consistency. I doubt their thought process is any more involved than "Muslims are brown; therefore Muslims are oppressed and can do no wrong".