🎨 Artcow Iconoclast / Jonathan Mack Sweet - The Chris-Chan of Arkansas

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Holdek said:
I'm curious, Dr. Jones Hat, what do you think allowed you to have an epiphany while Sweet hasn't had one? The dude's, what, 39-years-old now? About two decades older than you were when you stopped acting the fool, and yet he is still a disruptive man-child.


It seems quite a few lolcows were discovered by their A-Logging of Chris-Chan, including A-Log himself.
Click to expand...
I lost all my friends, and my family called me on my shit. Sweet apparently never had any friends to lose and his family either didn't care or didn't know how to deal with him.

Also the idea that our rights are curtailled in times of war has been slapped down repeatedly by the Supreme Court. The only thing that can be suspended is habeus corpus, and that's only in the case of rebellion in the US itself and even that didn't survive a Supreme Court challenge during the Civil War. It's beyond laughable to consider a spat between two internet forums a "war".
 
Last edited:
Dr. B made a giant post about this in the News thread over on AJM.

I said "Keep it in the Kiwi Thread."

Now, I have a 50% warning on AJM studios. I wondered why for a moment, and the I remembered, yet again, that this is all my fault. I keep forgetting that! :lol:
 
Treenbeen said:
Dr. B made a giant post about this in the News thread over on AJM.

I said "Keep it in the Kiwi Thread."

Now, I have a 50% warning on AJM studios. I wondered why for a moment, and the I remembered, yet again, that this is all my fault. I keep forgetting that! :lol:
Click to expand...

So, he breaks the site rules but you get punished? Yep. Seems legit
 
I would love to see some transcripts/screencaps of ol' Fartknocker's activity over there the past few days, if anyone with AJM access wouldn't mind dropping some. plz?
 
Francis York Morgan said:
So, he breaks the site rules but you get punished? Yep. Seems legit
Click to expand...
Apparently, I was too passive aggressive.
207qome.png

2vijrz6.png

281rdye.png
 
@Treenbeen - if anything was passive-aggressive about your initial post, it's the meme in pink, which could be readily interpreted as a jab at Sweet Bro himself and his, shall we say, unearned income. It certainly wasn't asking for discussion of a topic to go in its proper thread! Stress sigh goes here.
 
Apparently, they're conflict adverse. Not a good trait to have on the internet.
 
I have since been instructed not to "don't spread the wrong message, as I am sure you will, to other sites."
 
The depths that he will delve to to try and seem smart are always hilarious to me. I wish we could poke him for more content.
 
I honestly don't mean to be tooting my own horn here, but I'm going to post a recent reply I made over at AJM here in case they delete it. It's a bit ... honest. In honor of Jon Sweet, his quotes are in turd brown.



Again, I've decided to keep my comments about Belch on this thread, in keeping with the original agreement. I see, however, that Belch hasn't, which I will presume is why his warning level is up to 50%. I feel that, if this is the case, this is a move which would make future forum members feel more secure.

I can't imagine why Treenbeen has been warned. She hasn't done anything wrong.

Anyway, onto Belch's post:

Propaganda is a big part of any war, and the CWCiki Koala forums are nothing more than a huge disinformation mill, cranking out lies faster that I can possibly refute them.


This is not true, and you have posted no credible evidence of this. Shame on you.


They tried to make me look like some chinless freak and actually cited a possible medical condition or inbreeding as a cause. That is how sick they are. Of course, now that they were called on it, they'll say, "Duh, we was on'y joking" or "Nuh nuh nuh! You misin-TUHH-pret! You misin-TUHHHH-pret!"

I was the one who originally shopped two of those photos, so let me go ahead an make myself perfectly clear. Ready? Here goes:

You look like a chinless freak. A character from a Berkeley Breathed cartoon. An inverted speedbag with wild hair growing all over it.

Your skull looks like a thumb with rat-like features.

I was not joking. I am not joking now.

Got it?

Good.

The reason I bring this up is because, in reference to your long-held wish-dream of returning to ASU, you've often longed to have fictional women call you up for sex. Well, Belch, no one wants to have sex with you. The simple fact of the matter is that you are simply too unattractive, in several different aspects, to ever be in a romantic relationship. Looks are one thing, and can be ignored, but your lazy, selfish, delusional, destructive, disrespectful, ignorant, bigoted, cowardly, disgusting behavior added to such an aggressively unpleasant face pretty much guarantees you're going to be single and untouched for the rest of your life.

Does this sound harsh? Well, if so, that is a positive. As I said before, if you are going to lie, insult, and misrepresent us - as you did above - I will tell the truth about you.

By the way, this is GIMP? The program you people try to convince me to switch to? Pffft. Not impressed. Still sticking with MS Paint.

(Sweet posted an inaccurate and, naturally, ugly version of his doctored photo of his own.)


That's all you can do with MS Paint? Pffft. Not impressed. Still sticking with our pics. Your retouching looks awful. It looks like grey paste was smeared on your face. Also, it is inaccurate. You included the outlines of your beard. The entire point of the venture was to visualize what you would look like without the beard. Once it's gone, your chin is quite weak.


Is it that hard to follow my chin line?

Yes. It's virtually non-existent. As I said, very weak.

It's pretty big, actually.

No it isn't.

I do have a thin upper lip and am a little self-conscious about it, hence the mustache. However, I find my rapidly thinning hairline accentuates my brow and makes my head resemble an egg. That's why I wear hats in many of my photos. The neck thing they note could be a bone spur.

Thus, after all of your empty, vulgar rhetoric, you finally admit we have a point.


So, yeah, there's that.
 
Treenbeen said:
I have since been instructed not to "don't spread the wrong message, as I am sure you will, to other sites."
Click to expand...
Oh you little trouble maker you. I love it when boards try to enforce their culture offsite. Free Republic tried that, so did SA.

Sweet needs to lose his hugbox, it's the only way he'll grow up if it's even still possible at this point. They're not doing him any favors by keeping him around.
 
I'm corresponding with one of the mods. I won't post his responses to this conversation, because it's being had privately, but I will share what I sent to him:

"I won't deny that I've been really passive aggressive, but I don't think I've been "putting down the website in nearly every post." I do question a lot of things that have been happening lately, but I feel like I'm justified in doing so.

Here's my frustration with the warning: Dr. Belch gets to be racist, misogynistic, perverted, obscene, crass, judgmental, and verbally abusive against legitimate mental disorders, dismissive of a rape attempt because "maybe he thought I was one of 'those' girls"...

But I can't be passive aggressive?

How many times have I tried to stop this? I told him (repeatedly) not to contact me or speak with me. I asked the mods to watch his posts. I offered to leave the site. I created a thread to keep the conversation in one place. I've tried to enforce keeping the conversation in one place.

But I don't want to be expected to just... be quiet about important things. I've been trying to keep it to that one thread, because I know ya'll want to just ignore it, but I'm not sure why everyone is allowing him to get away with all of this behavior. Because he's been here for a while? So have I, and no one is cutting me ANY slack"
 
Treenbeen said:
I'm corresponding with one of the mods. I won't post his responses to this conversation, because it's being had privately, but I will share what I sent to him:

"I won't deny that I've been really passive aggressive, but I don't think I've been "putting down the website in nearly every post." I do question a lot of things that have been happening lately, but I feel like I'm justified in doing so.

Here's my frustration with the warning: Dr. Belch gets to be racist, misogynistic, perverted, obscene, crass, judgmental, and verbally abusive against legitimate mental disorders, dismissive of a rape attempt because "maybe he thought I was one of 'those' girls"...

But I can't be passive aggressive?

How many times have I tried to stop this? I told him (repeatedly) not to contact me or speak with me. I asked the mods to watch his posts. I offered to leave the site. I created a thread to keep the conversation in one place. I've tried to enforce keeping the conversation in one place.

But I don't want to be expected to just... be quiet about important things. I've been trying to keep it to that one thread, because I know ya'll want to just ignore it, but I'm not sure why everyone is allowing him to get away with all of this behavior. Because he's been here for a while? So have I, and no one is cutting me ANY slack"
Click to expand...

For people who claim to be friendly and Christian, they're sure saying "fuck you" to you loud and clear. Also, it's not surprising that they're not doing anything about his harassment, a lot of sites fail to take legit harassment seriously.
 
Treenbeen said:
I'm corresponding with one of the mods. I won't post his responses to this conversation, because it's being had privately, but I will share what I sent to him:

"I won't deny that I've been really passive aggressive, but I don't think I've been "putting down the website in nearly every post." I do question a lot of things that have been happening lately, but I feel like I'm justified in doing so.

Here's my frustration with the warning: Dr. Belch gets to be racist, misogynistic, perverted, obscene, crass, judgmental, and verbally abusive against legitimate mental disorders, dismissive of a rape attempt because "maybe he thought I was one of 'those' girls"...

But I can't be passive aggressive?

How many times have I tried to stop this? I told him (repeatedly) not to contact me or speak with me. I asked the mods to watch his posts. I offered to leave the site. I created a thread to keep the conversation in one place. I've tried to enforce keeping the conversation in one place.

But I don't want to be expected to just... be quiet about important things. I've been trying to keep it to that one thread, because I know ya'll want to just ignore it, but I'm not sure why everyone is allowing him to get away with all of this behavior. Because he's been here for a while? So have I, and no one is cutting me ANY slack"
Click to expand...
Honestly you've been quite direct. I mean I guess one could interpret your reaction to the "times of war" thing as passive-aggressive, but the original comment was so infantile, and quite frankly, offensively timed (on Memorial Day, for fuck's sake) that the only suitable response is mockery (I could only muster a mocking emoticon).

(I could post as much over at AJM, but I'm pretty sure my opinion holds little weight with the AJM mods as I'm still a noob, although I've tried branching out to other areas of non-Kiwi conversation a bit lately.)
 
Last edited:
Honestly this is just making me lose any sort of respect for that site to be honest with that level of doublethink and hypocrisy. Really doesn't help when you keep in mind that by doing this, they're basically saying it's A-OK to plot and cheer for the deaths of people you don't like (Not very virtuous), be racist to people (again, not very virtuous), and to backtalk people (which is actually somewhat a sin depending on how you interpret some parts of the bible). They are effectively bleating that being a shit person is okay, which a true good Samaritan would not do, as this does not help.

Holdek said:
Honestly you've been quite direct. I mean I guess you could interpret your reaction to the "times of war" thing as passive-aggressive, but the original comment was so infantile, and quite frankly, offensively timed (on Memorial Day, for fuck's sake) that the only suitable response is mockery (I could only muster a mocking emoticon).
Click to expand...

It's pathetic in my opinion, since drama only ever is as bad as you make it out to be. It's so easy to walk away from e-drama its laughable. Doubly so if it's restricted... oh wait, the member you're defending refuses to follow conduct and is getting the better deal out of it. What does that have to do with being a good Christian again? Because this is usually something that the irreligious like to point out by the by.
 
He Sets Me On Fire said:
The neck thing they note could be a bone spur.

Thus, after all of your empty, vulgar rhetoric, you finally admit we have a point.
Click to expand...
So now he acknowledges that he doesn't crane his neck on purpose. :lol:

DrJonesHat said:
Also the idea that our rights are curtailled in times of war has been slapped down repeatedly by the Supreme Court. The only thing that can be suspended is habeus corpus, and that's only in the case of rebellion in the US itself and even that didn't survive a Supreme Court challenge during the Civil War.
Click to expand...
Well, yeah, that's pretty illegal. There are three ways to interpret a constitution: a positive liberty view in which the constitution states exactly what can be done, and anything else is forbidden; a negative liberty view in which anything that the constitution states and anything that it does not forbid can be done; and the extraconstitutionalist view, which Lincoln utilized during the Civil War (and which, as has been pointed out, was ruled illegal by the Supreme Court), in which the executive can act outside of the constitution's limits for the express purpose of the preservation of the constitution.
 
My newest addition to the forum... I don't mean to speak for anyone here, or anyone other than myself really... but... correct me if I'm wrong... is this the message you are getting?

Treenbeen: I know you and I are discussing this privately, and this isn't directed at you specifically... but can you see how it doesn't feel like a "true loving, respectful, extended family of a community" to some of us?

These last several months have been a mess, I'll be the first person to admit that, but do you really think it creates a "welcome loving family atmosphere" when people can see the response to Trollis and I having a different opinion?

I mean... I can't blame AJMLurker for not wanting you guys to know who they are (yes, I know. No I won't say), because look how I've been treated these last few months. A constant of:

"Never should have made bridges with them Treenbeen.
undecided.png
Destroyed ten years worth of a community very quickly."


"This is your fault..." and "You never should have" and "You destroyed everything" and "Think long and hard about that decision", and now penalizing me for being negative.

Dr. Belch has only been on this website 6 months longer than I have. 6 months. He's been a more active member than I have, sure, but still...

Look, I know what everyone on this website thinks of me. I always have. And I know that overall, it's not good. I'm the drama queen, the "always has a problem", the absentee, the "oh my god will this girl never shut up?" But, for the most part, everyone has always been very kind and welcoming, until I dared to show a different opinion.

These last few months, I have felt far more validated, supported and appreciated by the Kiwi Farms than by anyone here.

Especially knowing that people are reading this, I think ya'll need to really watch what you say. Because they see how the people of this site have been treating me, responding to me, and to people outside the site... and they are reading it as "those freakin' Christian conservatives. This is the crap they pull."

And to come here, and see blatant racism, sexism, misogyny, threats, and absolutely reprehensible treatment of those with mental illness or sexual assault victims from Dr. Belch be supported without a second thought, but to be slammed down for questioning it, over and over and over again, and then be told "we're his family"... you know what gets filled in the blank in my mind:


"We're his family... but not yours."

So can you blame me for being a bit negative?

Can you blame AJMLurker for not wanting to reveal themself?

Because I can't"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom