🎨 Artcow Iconoclast / Jonathan Mack Sweet - The Chris-Chan of Arkansas

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Yeah honestly we value your opinion on things beyond Sweetness. :) You're a chill person and I really think they don't know what they're missing out on.
 
Leave it to the AJM community to completely blow things out of proportion because of their extreme aversion to conflict. Well, you reap what you sow.

I'm sorry Treenbeen.
 
I say this knowing full well that they'll just point at it as more evidence of our "divisive" nature, but here goes: if something like this, an obvious shithead in your midst, is enough to break apart a community, then perhaps it deserves to die. I admit, I'm kind of biased because here on the farms we have a system for dealing with divisive elements (namely, we expect it, NAY, crave the spergery) but to a forum like that, without a proper system in place for dealing with miscreants? All you have to fall back on is the love for one another, which honestly seems to be lacking in a major way. :(
 
Treenbeen said:
Apparently, I was too passive aggressive.
207qome.png

2vijrz6.png

281rdye.png
Click to expand...
He ignored mine.:heart-empty:
And he still looks like he lacks a chin in his "good" version. Hey Belch, provide us a higher resolution picture of your mug. I can make it more accurate.
 
Treenbeen said:
"Never should have made bridges with them Treenbeen.
undecided.png
Destroyed ten years worth of a community very quickly."
Click to expand...

Honestly, fuck em. They chose to appease a user like Sweets over you- That's telling.

I'm convinced- I think AJM uses Bletch like a feel-good release valve. Sure, he's said some horrendous shit on the web, he's done horrific shit in IRL, he's routinely acted like a borderline schizophrenic and made numerous threats to people...BUT he really sticks it to those liberals, doesn't he?

They're using their Christianity as a shield to deflect criticism. It's just a way of keeping Sweets on the site for his attack dog aspect.

Excluding a few users, they've come across as dishonest shits. I'm sorry you've had to go through this @Treenbeen If they had been honest with themselves, Sweets would be in your position now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@Treenbeen obviously the answer to their criticisms of you should be the one they use to defend Belch: "Nobody's perfect!"

Fo' serious, though, chiming in with everyone else to say that we're glad to have you here.
 
Quoting Belch's latest reply for those who haven't seen it

HSMOF: All of your less-than-lovely behaviors can be traced directly to you, only you, no one but you.
Click to expand...

Blah, blah, blah. Sing it again, H.S., one more time.

(Link to Marilyn Monroe's "I Wanna Be Loved By You" here)

No, sorry, it doesn't wash. Whenever I talk about how I lived it up in college, how I had complete and utter control of my life and was master of my own domain, I get told I really wasn't, and that they were really in charge, calling the shots, making the rules, and insisting I obey them. But when something goes wrong, it's my fault? How does that logically begin to make sense?

Sure, I made a few mistakes on The Herald here and there, but by about November I'd sort of evened out. I cut back my office hours drastically, was promoted to "research" for my work on a special project, and I'd found my niche writing columns. For my efforts I got more mail and gifts than any of the other staffer that semester. I firmly believe my co-workers were jealous of all the attention I was getting...or possibly worried that my style was attracting the wrong sort of readers. Either way, that's when the tall poppy effect came in. They decided I was gathering too many moonbeams in my jar--hence, the whole phony plagiarism charge. You people have said so yourself-- the charge sounds mighty fishy and they just wanted me gone for personal reasons, but were too bumbling and passive-aggressive to simply ask me to step down.

To imply that you cannot get over whatever programming going to college put you through also implies that you're severely mentally challenged.
Click to expand...

If you eventually "get over" programming, it wasn't very good programming, now was it?

Drunkenness, drug abuse, and hazing rituals are part of the college experience all over the world.
Click to expand...

Oh, well, that's a real selling point. Not exactly something they put in those lovely full-color brochures, is it? "Come to F.U. We'll treat you like filth and charge 5 Gs a semester for the privilege." And besides, it seems like it'd be a lot easier and more direct to tell someone, "Hey, you're not really working out here, why don't you just pack up and go home" than to sit around and dream up a bunch of convoluted schemes to scare them off. What are you going to do, Charlie from across the hall, put on a rubber mask and act like old man Jenkins trying to scare the tourists away from his farm? Rev up the Mystery Machine and break out the Scooby snacks--we 've got a case, gang. It amuses me to think some guy tried that door lock "prank" three different times, and all he wound up with was frustrated as hell and about 97 cents poorer. Of course I'm not learning any lesson here. How are you supposed to stop the disruptive, offensive behavior you so resent when your actions actually serve to foster more of it, thereby only exacerbating your resentment? Progressiveism: forever at cross-purposes with itself.

Doesn't affect others the way you allege it affected you.
Click to expand...

Oh, I think it does, but most just won't admit it out of fear of repercussion, or because they don't want to seem weak. Which is why these people get away with it.

...Dr. Merk made it pretty clear that it was you who couldn't tell the difference between a printer and a photocopier.
Click to expand...

Um...pssst, they come bundled together in the same unit now. Of course, this was 1996, when most of the high schools here were still using typewriters, most of the new Herald writers, like myself, had to be taught to operate the computers and printer in the office. The copy machine was a monster that took up half a room, was jealously guarded, and had to be kept under lock and key so the fumble-fingered newbies wouldn't break it. So of course I wasn't that familiar with the copy machine.

ASU and the Doc essentially tell us that you were an unwelcome, loudmouthed, insufferably vulgar, helplessly incapable social pinworm with disgusting table manners who nobody liked and would actively avoid or haze. Are you saying that you agree with this?
Click to expand...

No, that goes without saying. First of all, Doc Murky and ASU are clearly the same person. Think about it: they have same style of writing, they joined the forum within about a week of one another, and they seem to know an awful lot about my old alma mater. This clearly breaks a rule about sockpuppeting, does it not...? Secondly, I don't believe ol' Murky even talked to anyone from A-State, because he named no sources, gave no direct quotes, and said things no reputable journalist would say. Even if libel wasn't a concern, he pretty much made the Herald editorial staff sound ineffectual and incompetent. Of all the questions he could have asked, why about my buttons? Especially since I mentioned that myself here on this forum somewhere. But you believe him without question because he says everything you want to hear. Even if we're saying the exact same thing, you accuse me of lying but swallow his blah-blah without question. Case in point:

In my day we didn't take girls out on formal dates. If we liked her and she liked us, we slipped off into a broom closet or a bathroom stall somewhere and fooled around. It was the nineties; things were simpler then.

Girls [at ASU] were no different from girls anywhere else in the US. ... You didn't have to "date" to get laid...


The first was me; the second, ASU. Let's admit it: 1997 progressivism was very different from 2015 progressivism. If a millennial liberal of today were to hop into a time machine, pop back 19 years, and bring a Gen-X Clinton-loving leftie here to the present, the two would be utterly appalled by one another. The 2015 progressive would say that the 1997 progressive was a pig who used women and didn't respect them or care about their rights in the least. The 1997 progressive would lament that the 2015 progressive's ideas wrecked a once-booming economy and gutted a military that was the envy of the world.

By the way, if you're reading this, pal, do yourself a favor: stick to reminiscing about the good old days at A-State and knock off the wildcat speculations about my family. You were way off base trying to blame me for my brother's drug addiction. That was Dale's fault, and one of the many, many, many reasons I have vowed revenge on him.
insane.png
Click to expand...

Same shit, different day.
 
ToroidalBoat said:
Also, apparently this site is a propaganda factory now.
Click to expand...

The factory seems to do good work. It has driven Sweet to attempt to photoshop images of himself in a failed effort to prove that there is a chin beneath the mound of pubic hair he has chosen to glue to his face.
 
You know, sometimes I feel sorry for Icky. He's inevitably going to die alone, unloved, probably ill from the untreated mold growing in his bedroom, filled with bitter hate and regret. His passing will go unmourned and overlooked by all but a scant few: those of us who find his incompetence fascinating and his asspatters at AJM. His grave will likely go unattended, grow as unkempt as everything else in his life, and probably be vandalized. The truest representation of a life that was never truly lived.

...Then I read some of the hateful dribble that pours out of his mouth like water from a damaged faucet and all that goes away.
 
So wait, he's reading every one of our responses, but he's too much of a pissy pants baby to come reply directly? He just tapes his posts to the walls of his hugbox and goes "SO THERE!"?

Oh shit I probably turned him on by calling him a pissy pants baby...
 
sonichuis44 said:
So wait, he's reading every one of our responses, but he's too much of a pissy pants baby to come reply directly? He just tapes his posts to the walls of his hugbox and goes "SO THERE!"?
Click to expand...

Yeah. Our courageous, conservative freedom fighter is quite the little bitch.
 
The Mountain said:
You know, sometimes I feel sorry for Icky. He's inevitably going to die alone, unloved, probably ill from the untreated mold growing in his bedroom, filled with bitter hate and regret. His passing will go unmourned and overlooked by all but a scant few: those of us who find his incompetence fascinating and his asspatters at AJM. His grave will likely go unattended, grow as unkempt as everything else in his life, and probably be vandalized. The truest representation of a life that was never truly lived.

...Then I read some of the hateful dribble that pours out of his mouth like water from a damaged faucet and all that goes away.
Click to expand...

I think we would all pity him except for the fact that he continues to stalk, harass and threaten people whose only offense was to cross his path almost 20 years ago. That behavior makes him deserving of everything he gets. I also find it highly irritating the his activities are funded with our tax dollars since the Paragon of Republican Virtues has refused to even attempt to get a real job for his entire life because he has more important things to do.
 
Last edited:
Dr. Merkwurdichliebe said:
I think we would all pity him except for the fact that he continues to stalk and harass people whose only offense was to cross in path in life. That behavior makes him deserving of everything he gets.
Click to expand...

Didn't you say you aren't naming the people you talked to to protect them from retaliation from Sweet?

I was one of the people who had pity for him, until he established what a completely repellent character he is.
 
Treenbeen said:
Thank you, sincerely. I appreciate that. I need to branch out on this forum some more, haha.
Click to expand...

Indeed; we actually have a decent pool of things outside of these types of threads too, for more personal matters and interests.

TheIceCreamMan said:
I say this knowing full well that they'll just point at it as more evidence of our "divisive" nature, but here goes: if something like this, an obvious shithead in your midst, is enough to break apart a community, then perhaps it deserves to die. I admit, I'm kind of biased because here on the farms we have a system for dealing with divisive elements (namely, we expect it, NAY, crave the spergery) but to a forum like that, without a proper system in place for dealing with miscreants? All you have to fall back on is the love for one another, which honestly seems to be lacking in a major way. :(
Click to expand...

I've run into these kind of sites in the past. The owners tend to be somewhat exceptional and rather hypocritical as well; they often say one thing, then indulge in the thing they rail against regularly. They also tend to have rather thin skin and cannot understand how to handle things decisively, because they apparently can't just muster up the cajones to do anything right.

And really, if they want a horrible sobbing wreck like Sweets, they've earned it. I mean, he's only the best liberal and conservative strawman ever and can be used as a reason why to never go there. Ever.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom