- Joined
- Feb 5, 2013
What will happen when Barb Mama Sweet dies? 
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What will happen whenBarbMama Sweet dies?![]()
So in other words...Continued pissing in jars, followed by long bouts of doing nadda.
And, really, that's not even the biggest problem. The biggest problem is that he refuses to consider advice on how to improve, if only by reading some books on cartooning.Honestly, trying to point out everything wrong with Sweet's comic would result in a paper so long it would put PhD dissertations to shame.
Damn. Sweet still erroneously thinks we're idiots (says the guy who's catchphrase is "no one told me") and he thinks we can't fathom his conspiracy theories (we can). Also, I don't think anything is going to shake him out of the delirious view he has about "AS(S)U" at this point. It's probably like a CD or a ROM chip in his mind - read only.Update
Actually, that was my shoop. He doesn't understand how and why I'm making fun of him.I'm going to assume the regression is due to the hole in the wall. It's all connected. Breathing in the mold over such a long period of time has had a massive impact on his, already fragile, mental state. It's spread from his lungs to his brain.
Also, Sweets, even if you looked seven to ten years younger with the right hairpiece, you'd still look like a middle aged pedobear. The fact that he did the shopping for us is pretty glorious though.
Food for thought. When Merk brought up the pee jar, Sweet did not even deny it. He even sounded like he was proud of it. So yeah, I think Merk is legit.
I wonder if Sweet made up some Whitewash Jones-esque speech mocking the view that secondhand smoke is harmful.He also laments the '70s when you could smoke indoors.
Way to be respectful of the dead, Sweets, by calling a well respected and clearly loved professor an "old bat."
He also laments the '70s when you could smoke indoors. Smoking bans are fairly recent. Like last decade recent. And by my count Sweets was born in '77.
I wonder if Sweet made up some Whitewash Jones-esque speech mocking the view that secondhand smoke is harmful.
Images don't hurt anyone, true, but we've already established that Belch Dimension is basically your escapism and warped fantasies anyway so it's still showing that you're a bit fucked in the head.Sweets said:So it seems some responses on last week's art blog indicated anger and disgust at me depicting two characters, one of whom was only 14, engaged in a torrid love affair. However, you have to keep in mind that all I do is draw images of people doing horrendous things to one another. The people the story was based on, my former coworkers, not only lied against me and cost my job, but tried to embroil me in a sex scandal. Some devious person, whether a former co-worker seeking revenge on me for nearly shutting down the school paper with my TV ratings column, or a disturbed ex-fan who felt I betrayed my followers by getting fired and needed to be punished, set me up with a girl under the age of consent@ in an attempt to discredit me, have me kicked out of school and possibly even see me arrested as a sex offender. Now whether the faculty adviser knew of the plot is a secret, I fear, that the old bat has taken to her grave.
Given all the strings it sounded like he had to pull to even get you your fucking spot and maintain it, you sound a lot like an inconsiderate dumbass when he realized that you were simply squandering all the shit he was trying to do for you and dragging him down with you.Sweets said:Likewise, the murder of Mack Burke is a dramatization of what actually happened to my mentor on the paper; he was passed over for a promotion to the top spot. Several weeks later, following an ugly argument with "Lucy Chaser", he abruptly quit-- in essence, becoming "dead" to me. "Burke" has cut off all contact, steadfastly refusing to discuss the subject since, and I firmly believe he still blames me for the dispute that sparked his resignation. As he will no longer answer my e-mails, I may never find out the full truth. However, it remains a chilling testimony to the horrors of the college journalism world, and how people you think are your friends will suddenly turn viciously on you with minds poisoned by deceit.
The funny thing is that we can easily reverse this on you. You've made several audacious claims about conspiracies, liars, and the evils of liberals, but whenever we tell you to cite your sources or when we post contradictory information you lock down and cry that it's all stupid liberal indoctrination or stuff.Sweets said:Of course, those idiots at The Other Forum cannot possibly fathom such a thing. They'd rather blame the deception on a roommate who never showed up in retaliation for an offense that never existed.@ These people show a phenomenal inability to think for themselves, blithely believing in anything anyone tells them that furthers their diseased agenda, despite any and all evidence to the contrary. I think one of two things is happening: (a) Doctor Merkwurdichliebe is fabricating these "sources" of his, which means he is lying, or (b) his sources, who have their own secret agenda, are lying to him, and he believes them without question... which means he's just stupid. I say ol' Doc Murky should be challenged by the mods at OTF to produce the names of his sources immediately, or else cease his vile and destructive campaign against me.
AJM Forum.Sweets said:He makes the whole place look bad by distributing unsubstantiated and outright incorrect or falsified information, and I would suggest he be banned from the forum. By protecting this guy they only make themselves look bad and open themselves up to a world of legal problems. I don't know why they keep defending this cretin, this frigtard, this dishonest Deutschland douchebag, this little sour kraut, this massive albatross around their necks. What do they get out of it? He'll only drag them down into the gutter with him if they don't cut him loose.![]()
Ah, the 1970's, when it was still perfectly fine to ostracize gay people and a lot of people didn't take the whole "smoking has health problems" issues seriously. Good times.Sweets said:Ah, the 1970s, when you could actually smoke indoors in a public building.
You still look like a creeper and I would not have sex with you.Sweets said:Hm. I don't care what they say, the right hairpiece would take at least seven to 10 years off.![]()
Sweet indeed tends to add details every time he tells a story in an attempt to defend himself from various criticisms. A prime example of this is the stuck-at-a-hospital-for-8-hours story.I swear that Sweets keeps trying to add more onto his shitty story[...]