I Tried to Filter Him Out - As a Pakistani Muslim, I knew that falling for a Hindu Indian would break me. And it did.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

I Tried to Filter Him Out​

As a Pakistani Muslim, I knew that falling for a Hindu Indian would break me. And it did.



18MODERN-MYRA-articleLarge.jpg

18MODERN-MYRA-articleLarge.jpg

Credit...Brian Rea
By Myra Farooqi
April 16, 2021Updated 12:16 a.m. ET

We started texting during the early months of the pandemic, going back and forth every day for hours. The stay-at-home order created a space for us to get to know each other because neither of us had any other plans.
We built a friendship founded on our love of music. I introduced him to the hopelessly romantic soundtrack of my life: Durand Jones & The Indications, Toro y Moi and the band Whitney. He introduced me to classic Bollywood soundtracks, Tinariwen and the bass-filled tracks of Khruangbin.
He was eccentrically passionate in a way that barely annoyed me and often inspired me. Our banter was only curtailed by bedtimes we grudgingly enforced at 3 a.m., after eight straight hours of texting.
We had met on a dating app for South Asians called Dil Mil. My filters went beyond age and height to exclude all non-Muslim and non-Pakistani men. As a 25-year-old woman who grew up in the Pakistani-Muslim community, I was all too aware of the prohibition on marrying outside of my faith and culture, but my filters were more safeguards against heartbreak than indications of my religious and ethnic preferences. I simply did not want to fall for someone I couldn’t marry (not again, anyway — I had already learned that lesson the hard way).

How a passionate, quirky, ambitious, 30-year-old, Hindu Indian American made it through my filters — whether by technical glitch or an act of God — I’ll never know. All I know is that once he did, I fell deeply in love with him.


He lived in San Francisco while I was quarantining seven hours south. I had already planned to move up north, but Covid and the forest fires delayed those plans. By August, I finally made the move — both to my new home and on him.
He drove two hours to pick me up bearing gag gifts that represented inside jokes we had shared during our two-month texting phase. I already knew everything about this man except his touch, his essence and his voice.
After two months of effortless communication, we approached this meeting desperate to be as perfect in person. The pressure to be nothing less overwhelmed us until he turned some music on. Dre’es’s “Warm” played and everything else fell into place — soon we were laughing like old friends.
We went to the beach and shopped for plants. At his apartment, he made me drinks and dinner. The stove was still on when my favorite Toro y Moi song, “Omaha,” came on. He stopped cooking to deliver a cheesy line that was quickly overshadowed by a passionate kiss. In this pandemic, it was just us, with our favorite music accompanying every moment.

On our fourth date, he transformed his apartment into The Fillmore venue to create a concert at home. He scanned my fake ticket, took my coat, made a gaudy cocktail and ushered me to the dimly lit dance floor where we danced terribly, but always in each other’s arms.
He ended the set with Leon Bridges’s song, “Beyond,” one I had heard many times. He held me tight and whispered, “I was afraid to show you this song, but here it

We swayed slowly as I listened to the lyrics: “I’m scared to death that she might be it … That the love is real, that the shoe might fit …”
I avoided eye contact with him, but I gripped the back of his flannel shirt tighter because I knew what line was coming: “Will she be my wife?”
He wasn’t crazy, and it was not too soon, because I felt the same. After having endured several dead-end relationships with non-Muslims and Muslims alike, here he was at last, the man I was supposed to be with. I knew it was time to have the big conversation with him — the one in which I remind him that I am Muslim.
On our fifth date, we drank white wine on a semi-quiet San Francisco street corner. I asked if he was ready to hear more about my family and religion.
“Yes,” he said.
I said, “Do you understand what it means to be with a Muslim girl?”
He began to ramble about his academic curiosity for the Quran and spirituality, and his eagerness to raise children in an interfaith household.
“If we decide to be together,” I said, “you need to understand that the only way forward is for you to convert. It won’t make things easy, but it will make things possible.”
His answer came too fast for comfort: “I’m game.”
How could he be so certain?

“Sometimes,” he said, “you are willing to change your whole future for one person.”
He and I continued to date for the rest of the year, fleeing from the societal expectations of our families and communities — fleeing, really, from any expectations at all. In our Covid bubble, we said “I love you” too soon, didn’t listen to our friends when they urged us to take it slow and ignored the harsh familial realities ahead of us.

I hadn’t told my mother anything about him, not a word, despite being months into the most consequential romantic relationship of my life. But Thanksgiving was fast approaching, when we each would return to our families.
This love story may have been his and mine, but without my mother’s approval, there would be no path forward. She was born and raised in Karachi, Pakistan. To expect her to understand how I fell in love with a Hindu would require her to unlearn all the traditions and customs with which she had been raised. I promised myself to be patient with her.
I was scared to raise the subject, but I wanted to share my happiness. With just the two of us in my bedroom, she began complaining about Covid spoiling my marriage prospects, at which point I blurted the truth: I already had met the man of my dreams.
“Who?” she said. “Is he Muslim?”
When I said no, she shrieked.
“Is he Pakistani?”
When I said no, she gasped.
“Can he speak Urdu or Hindi?”
When I said no, she started to cry.

But as I spoke about my relationship with him, and the fact that he had pledged to convert for me, she softened.
“I have never seen you talk about anyone like this,” she said. “I know you’re in love.” With these words of understanding, I saw that her strict framework was ultimately less important than my happiness.

When I told him that my mother knew the truth, he celebrated the momentum this development promised. However, in the coming weeks, he grew anxious that her approval was entirely predicated on him converting.

We each returned home once more for the December holidays, and that’s when I felt the foundation of my relationship with him begin to crack. With every delayed response to my texts, I knew something had changed. And indeed, everything had.
When he told his parents that he was thinking of converting for me, they broke down, crying, begging, pleading with him not to abandon his identity. We were two people who were able to defy our families and lean on serendipitous moments, lucky numbers and astrology to prove we belonged together. But we only searched for signs because we ran out of solutions.

Finally, he called, and we spoke, but it didn’t take long to know where things stood.
“I will never convert to Islam,” he said. “Not nominally, not religiously.”
More quickly than he had declared “I’m game” on that sunny San Francisco afternoon all those months ago, I said, “Then that’s it.”
Many people will never understand the requirements of marrying a Muslim. For me, the rules about marriage are stubborn, and the onus of sacrifice lies with the non-Muslim whose family is presumably more open to the possibility of interfaith relationships. Many will say it’s selfish and incongruous that a non-Muslim must convert for a Muslim. To them I would say I cannot defend the arbitrary limitations of Muslim love because I have been broken by them. I lost the man I thought I would love forever.

For a while I blamed my mother and religion, but it’s hard to know how strong our relationship really was with the music turned off. We loved in a pandemic, which was not the real world. Our romance was insulated from the ordinary conflicts of balancing work, friends and family. We were isolated both by our forbidden love and a global calamity, which surely deepened what we felt for each other. What we had was real, but it wasn’t enough.
I have since watched Muslim friends marry converts. I know it’s possible to share a love so endless that it can overcome these obstacles. But for now, I will keep my filters on.

 
Dunno, maybe let the kid(s) decide on what religion to do once they can make choices? My point is, people should not let religion dictate their relationships.

Mormons can marry who ever they want for example, but to do the true and honest temple weddings which is an eternal seal, the non-Mormon would have to convert and get endowed.
See, that can work if the religion is strictly cultural OR if both parties believe in loosy goosy religions that are more about communing with generic spirituality, religions where specific beliefs aren't necessary to get a decent afterlife.

But religions like Islam, Chrisianity, Judaism and etc have rules in the very fabric of of their religion about how marriages should operate and not marrying non-believers. And the God of the religion is supposed to be an active and mediating participant in the relationship. It's hard to be in a relationship with someone who is playing by a different set of moral rules, and doesn't agree that the referee in the sky should have a say.
 
No, I am correcting your ignorant statement.
No, you're taking the piss, obviously. Lack of explanation aside, you'd have appealed to a trifecta of reading, studying, and practicing if you weren't. You'd also have paid attention to the guy who carried on from what I said without disputing it but even agreeing. As it stands, you're the one making the ignorant statement, but it must be bait if it's this half-baked.
 
No, you're taking the piss, obviously. Lack of explanation aside, you'd have appealed to a trifecta of reading, studying, and practicing if you weren't. You'd also have paid attention to the guy who carried on from what I said without disputing it but even agreeing. As it stands, you're the one making the ignorant statement, but it must be bait if it's this half-baked.
You seem to fail to understand the great freedom brought (and bought) by Christ. Christians are not subject to or judged by the Law of Moses. The NT is explicit about this. "Do not call unclean what I have made clean."
 
No, you're taking the piss, obviously. You'd have appealed to a trifecta of reading, studying, and practicing if you weren't. You'd also have paid attention to the guy who carried on from what I said without disputing it but even agreeing. As it stands, you're the one making the ignorant statement, but it must be bait if it's this half-baked.
Unless he's assuming we meant the Mosaic Law or whatever. I mean, the Sermon on the Mount should have made that clear when Jesus spoke on adultery being not just the physical act, but also an issue of the heart. Murder not just being physically killing someone, but starting with hate.

You seem to fail to understand the great freedom brought (and bought) by Christ. Christians are not subject to or judged by the Law of Moses. The NT is explicit about this. "Do not call unclean what I have made clean."
Pretty sure we weren't actually talking about following the Mosaic Code. It's a figure of speech and it was also meant as a comparison that both Islam and Judaism, especially modern Judaism, care mostly about the act. Hence the flipping a light switch being "work" comment. It technically is, but you have to be autistic to miss the point that much.
 
You seem to fail to understand the great freedom brought (and bought) by Christ. Christians are not subject to or judged by the Law of Moses. The NT is explicit about this. "Do not call unclean what I have made clean."
Matthew 5:17-18. "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished."
 
You seem to fail to understand the great freedom brought (and bought) by Christ. Christians are not subject to or judged by the Law of Moses. The NT is explicit about this. "Do not call unclean what I have made clean."
That verse isn't relevant, for one, and I wasn't referring to the law of Moses. That aside, Christ explicitly says that He came to fulfill the Law (of Moses), rather than abolish it (and needless to say, the product of that is what Christians are subject to). Jesus in particular condemns the Pharisees by charging them with not just not following the spirit of the Law (being overly focused on their acts rather than the position of their hearts), but not even following the Law as written in favor of pedantic traditions of their own creation.
 
Unless he's assuming we meant the Mosaic Law or whatever. I mean, the Sermon on the Mount should have made that clear when Jesus spoke on adultery being not just the physical act, but also an issue of the heart. Murder not just being physically killing someone, but starting with hate.
Thats alot of interpretation for a fluff story...

I dont understand what you guys are on, Christian consensus is very clear and has been for 500 years.
Rules dont matter, and judging people for not following rules is not cool.
Its up to god if you are chosen or not and your actions dont matter... maybe listen next time you are in church...
 
That verse isn't relevant, for one, and I wasn't referring to the law of Moses. That aside, Christ explicitly says that He came to fulfill the Law (of Moses), rather than abolish it (and needless to say, the product of that is what Christians are subject to). Jesus in particular condemns the Pharisees by charging them with not just not following the spirit of the Law (being overly focused on their acts rather than the position of their hearts), but not even following the Law as written in favor of pedantic traditions of their own creation.
Great modern example of what Christ criticized as "letter not spirit" imo are the Jews and how they do weird bullshit to avoid doing "work" on shabbat. Oy vey, we can't press a lift button because it creates a spark of electricity and that is "work" (creating fire) so we have to have shabbat lifts that waste far more energy.

If you ever watched any survival show, you would know that making a fire and maintaining it, specifically with old tools, is hard work. You have to light it, chop wood to feed it, remember to keep feeding it or it goes out, make sure it's protected from the elements and so on. Back in the time when Christ was meant to exist, all those activities listed were indeed hard work. Today, a lot of those things are not hard work. Now a days it is pure letter not spirit of the law that they do.
 
Nah, since the Hajj is basically like Disneyland these days, with package deals and Starbucks and whatnot. All the edges have been smoothed out and the visitor only sees the monuments built by Saudi Petrowealth.

"Wow during the hajj I swear I never experienced such an unity in belief across all races ❤️❤️❤️, met soooo many amazing girls on this trip who are so modest and yet rich in their souls ❤️❤️❤️"
So the Saudis ruined the one aspect of Islam I actually respect, a required pilgrimage that is supposed to humble you.
 
So the Saudis ruined the one aspect of Islam I actually respect, a required pilgrimage that is supposed to humble you.
It was inevitable because its also a giant money making opportunity and makes sense.

The real tragedy is that all those big hotels are built over old Mecca and the old residents removed to make way for this.

History destroyed for the sake of the globohomo and some giant ass Big Ben right over the mosque itself.
 
*Asterisk* would have been proud of this pajeet for refusing the snip
 
If I believe that my religion is truth, and that religion says that those who aren't adherents risk eternal damnation, why would I ever leave the soul of my children to chance if I love them?
I've met 2 Muslims whom have ate bacon(real bacon, not turkey), so this point means jack shit to me.
 
It was inevitable because its also a giant money making opportunity and makes sense.

The real tragedy is that all those big hotels are built over old Mecca and the old residents removed to make way for this.

History destroyed for the sake of the globohomo and some giant ass Big Ben right over the mosque itself.
The Saudis would demolish the Kabbah or whatever it is called in order to make more room if they could get away with it. Their petromoney can't run out soon enough
 
Is there any way we can move the back-and-forth bible autism to another thread and just focus on... whatever the point was here?
 
Back
Top Bottom