Science Human compost funerals 'better for the environment' - FEED THE BUGS PEASANT.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

A US firm has given scientific details of its "human composting" process for environmentally friendly funerals.

A pilot study on deceased volunteers showed that soft tissue broke down safely and completely within 30 days.

The firm, Recompose, claims that its process saves more than a tonne of carbon, compared to cremation or traditional burial.

It says that it will offer the world's first human composting service in Washington state from next February.

Speaking exclusively to BBC News, Recompose's chief executive and founder, Katrina Spade, said that concerns about climate change had been a big factor in so many people expressing interest in the service.

"So far 15,000 people have signed up to our newsletter. And the legislation to allow this in the state received bi-partisan support enabling it to pass the first time it was tabled," she said.

"The project has moved forward so quickly because of the urgency of climate change and the awareness we have to put it right."

Katrina Spade
Image copyrightRECOMPOSEImage captionRecompose boss Katrina Spade says her plan has proved so popular because of climate change
Ms Spade spoke to me as results of the scientific study into the composting process, which Recompose calls natural organic reduction, was being presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in Seattle.

"There is a loving practicability to it," she said, in one of the few interviews she has given since announcing details of the project a year ago.

She told me that she came up with the idea 13 years ago when she began to ponder her own mortality - at the ripe old age of 30!

"When I die, this planet, which has protected and supported me my whole life, shouldn't I give back what I have left?

"It is just logical and also beautiful."

Ms Spade draws a distinction between decomposing and recomposing. The former is what happens when a body is above ground. Recomposing involves integrating it with the soil.

She claims that natural organic reduction of a body prevents 1.4 tonnes of carbon being released into the atmosphere, compared with cremation. And she believes there is a similar saving compared to traditional burial when transportation and the construction of the casket is taken into account.

"For a lot of folks it resonates with the way they try to lead their lives. They want to pick a death care plan that resonates with the way they live."

The process involves laying the body in a closed vessel with woodchips, alfalfa and straw grass. The body is slowly rotated to allow microbes to break it down.

An artist vision of a future Recompose facility shows circular vessels in a honeycomb structure in a garden
Image copyrightRECOMPOSE/MOLT STUDIOSImage captionAn artist's vision of a future human composting facility
Thirty days later the remains are available to relatives to scatter on plants or a tree.

Although the process is straightforward, it has taken four years of scientific research to perfect the technique. Ms Spade asked soil scientist Prof Lynne Carpenter Boggs to undertake the work.

Composting livestock is a well-established practice in Washington state. Prof Carpenter Boggs's task was to adapt it for human subjects and ensure that the remains were environmentally safe.

She carried out pilot studies with six volunteers who had given their enthusiastic consent to the research prior to their deaths. She told me that the work took an emotional toll on her and her team.

"We all kept checking in on each other. My physiology felt different, I wasn't sleeping well for a few nights, I wasn't hungry - it was a distress response."

Prof Carpenter-Boggs found that the recomposing body reached temperatures of 55C (131F) for a period of time.

"We are certain that there has been a destruction of the vast majority of [disease-causing organisms] and pharmaceuticals because of the high temperatures that we reached."

Recompose will begin business later this year. Anyone can participate but the process is legal only in Washington state. Legislation to allow natural organic reduction is currently being considered in Colorado. Ms Spade believes that it will be a matter of time before it is more widely available - in the US and elsewhere.

"We hope other states will pick up the idea once we get going in Washington. We have had lots of excitement from the UK and other parts of the world and we hope to open branches overseas when we can."

----

Dying contributes to climate change now.

Just blow my body up with some kind of hilarious weaponry.
 
I'd do it. Why the fuck not.

Just do it like Diogenes and have your dead body just thrown into the local woods (or whatever place that has lots of animals) and let the animals have at it. See, sustainable and you're doing it the traditional way.
This is ironic for reasons I want to see if you can determine yourself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's your death, why not go all out and have some fun with it?

Fun things to do with your remains when you are dead.

1: Have your flesh stripped and used for tanning/decoration, will require prior acknowledgement pre autopsy
2: Have your fat removed and used for candles/wax, will require prior acknowledgement pre autopsy
3: Have your remains cremated and mixed in paint/ink/oils so that you will become art. Does not require any acknowledgment, just will statement
4: Have your corpse interred in polymer and then in wax, and subsequently have said wax coffin carved to be in likeness of you (requires pre mortem acknowledgement with parties involved)
5:Have your skull removed and used for decoration (Requires pre autopsy acknowledgment)
6: Inter your corpse at the base of a fruit bearing tree, so that future generations will eat "You" fruit. (Lemons for a chuckle) (Requires pre mortem acknowledgement with parties involved)
7: Taxidermy your corpse, that's right! Taxidermy your own corpse! Be the life (and death) of any halloween party by getting stuffed. (Requires pre mortem acknowledgement with parties involved)
8: Inter your corpse into a necropolis/catacomb/Hungarian Cathedral. Who says you have to be alone in death? (Requires pre mortem acknowledgement)
9: Inter your corpse into a peat bog and become a bog mummy. (Requires minor acknowledgement)
10: Be one last fuck you to your enemies! Glitter bomb your corpse! Have your ashes mixed with glitter and then mail yourself to your enemy. What are they going to do? You're already dead! (Warning, will get the person who sent the package on your end liable for legal and health matters)
 
Just put me in a cardboard box and roll me down a hill, thanks.
Fitting AND entertaining!
 
Personally, I want to be cryogenically frozen so my remains can be perfectly perserved for hundreds of years and maybe even revived in a future where we will have the science and technology to do so. I know that it would be practically imposible to keep the power on in one of the facilities running now for that long to keep someone frozen whether that be the earth getting hit by a solar flare, legal or financial troubles, or a world war, but the idea of it facinates me.
 
The whole industry around death is possibly the dumbest industry in the world. Throw my mortal shell in the dump and be done with it, I'll be too busy with my 72 virgins to care.
 
You can barely compost meat without it instantly attracting thousands of bugs, plus disease, and that shit can leak into your water supply.

Why did we start burying corpses in hermetically sealed containers? Leakage. Yeah, your dead family members come back as ghosts in the form of contamination and pestilence. Just fucking cremate, fuck's sake.
 
I want my rotting flesh to be mounted on a mechanical exoskeleton and brought out of cold storage once a year to trick or treat at the houses of my enemies and their descendants
 
She told me that she came up with the idea 13 years ago when she began to ponder her own mortality - at the ripe old age of 30!
She read Fun Home (2006), Alison Bechdel's memoir. Woketards are so goddamn predictable.

It's cremation on the taxpayer's dime for me. I'm extremely put off by the reverence society affords corpses, treating them, and burial places, as the extension of a dead person. Like, "I need to visit grandma, it's her birthday soon". No no no no no. Am I dead? Okay, call the garbage man to take out the garbage.
 
Honestly would be fine by me, idgaf.

Funeral services and the whole industry around it are a complete rip-off anyways. A hustle that takes advantage of people in mourning quite often too.
 
lmao all the shit about "shroud burial" is greta-worshipping "green" shit and "save the environment" crap, instead of just gee I dunno, not wanting to have my bereaved family members also have to deal with thousands of dollars in unplanned expenses.
 
Looking for the science behind it, I found her Master's Thesis and...it is about what you would expect.

Some choice quotes:



Bringing up babies playing in dirt is probably bad if you are talking about turning people into dirt.



"Big Funeral Man. Taking over what used to be a small cottage industry. Back in the day people would just bury their loved ones themselves and it was so much closer to nature maaan"



((That sounds like a terrible idea))



RED FLAG, RED FLAG



"My garden just makes me so much closer to nature maaan why can we all be like my garden."



While the paper has a bunch of citations...this isn't cited. Boo.
How many million tons of carbon did that fart huffing release?

The KLF had the best method of corpse disposal.

Thats kinda metal.
 
You can barely compost meat without it instantly attracting thousands of bugs, plus disease, and that shit can leak into your water supply.

Why did we start burying corpses in hermetically sealed containers? Leakage. Yeah, your dead family members come back as ghosts in the form of contamination and pestilence. Just fucking cremate, fuck's sake.
Who wouldn't want a prion slurry?
 
I've actually got no problem with the "green" burials where they just wrap you in cloth or a plain wooden box or something. I don't need to rot away slower... I mean, hypothetically, if I weren't planning on cremation.

But don't throw me in a compost heap. That's just... rude.
 
Honestly this sounds like counterproductive millennial shit.

My plan was to make enough money in life to freeze myself before I die. Maybe if I'm frozen long enough. Life expectancy will be stupidly long.
 
Back
Top Bottom