Science Human compost funerals 'better for the environment' - FEED THE BUGS PEASANT.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

A US firm has given scientific details of its "human composting" process for environmentally friendly funerals.

A pilot study on deceased volunteers showed that soft tissue broke down safely and completely within 30 days.

The firm, Recompose, claims that its process saves more than a tonne of carbon, compared to cremation or traditional burial.

It says that it will offer the world's first human composting service in Washington state from next February.

Speaking exclusively to BBC News, Recompose's chief executive and founder, Katrina Spade, said that concerns about climate change had been a big factor in so many people expressing interest in the service.

"So far 15,000 people have signed up to our newsletter. And the legislation to allow this in the state received bi-partisan support enabling it to pass the first time it was tabled," she said.

"The project has moved forward so quickly because of the urgency of climate change and the awareness we have to put it right."

Katrina Spade
Image copyrightRECOMPOSEImage captionRecompose boss Katrina Spade says her plan has proved so popular because of climate change
Ms Spade spoke to me as results of the scientific study into the composting process, which Recompose calls natural organic reduction, was being presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in Seattle.

"There is a loving practicability to it," she said, in one of the few interviews she has given since announcing details of the project a year ago.

She told me that she came up with the idea 13 years ago when she began to ponder her own mortality - at the ripe old age of 30!

"When I die, this planet, which has protected and supported me my whole life, shouldn't I give back what I have left?

"It is just logical and also beautiful."

Ms Spade draws a distinction between decomposing and recomposing. The former is what happens when a body is above ground. Recomposing involves integrating it with the soil.

She claims that natural organic reduction of a body prevents 1.4 tonnes of carbon being released into the atmosphere, compared with cremation. And she believes there is a similar saving compared to traditional burial when transportation and the construction of the casket is taken into account.

"For a lot of folks it resonates with the way they try to lead their lives. They want to pick a death care plan that resonates with the way they live."

The process involves laying the body in a closed vessel with woodchips, alfalfa and straw grass. The body is slowly rotated to allow microbes to break it down.

An artist vision of a future Recompose facility shows circular vessels in a honeycomb structure in a garden
Image copyrightRECOMPOSE/MOLT STUDIOSImage captionAn artist's vision of a future human composting facility
Thirty days later the remains are available to relatives to scatter on plants or a tree.

Although the process is straightforward, it has taken four years of scientific research to perfect the technique. Ms Spade asked soil scientist Prof Lynne Carpenter Boggs to undertake the work.

Composting livestock is a well-established practice in Washington state. Prof Carpenter Boggs's task was to adapt it for human subjects and ensure that the remains were environmentally safe.

She carried out pilot studies with six volunteers who had given their enthusiastic consent to the research prior to their deaths. She told me that the work took an emotional toll on her and her team.

"We all kept checking in on each other. My physiology felt different, I wasn't sleeping well for a few nights, I wasn't hungry - it was a distress response."

Prof Carpenter-Boggs found that the recomposing body reached temperatures of 55C (131F) for a period of time.

"We are certain that there has been a destruction of the vast majority of [disease-causing organisms] and pharmaceuticals because of the high temperatures that we reached."

Recompose will begin business later this year. Anyone can participate but the process is legal only in Washington state. Legislation to allow natural organic reduction is currently being considered in Colorado. Ms Spade believes that it will be a matter of time before it is more widely available - in the US and elsewhere.

"We hope other states will pick up the idea once we get going in Washington. We have had lots of excitement from the UK and other parts of the world and we hope to open branches overseas when we can."

----

Dying contributes to climate change now.

Just blow my body up with some kind of hilarious weaponry.
 
Okay sure, but why don't I just cut out the middleman and wander out into the woods to allow some mammals to scavenge my corpse? I don't need to pay some woke lesbian for the privilege of rotting: that shit happens on its own just fine.
 
It is every citizen's final duty to go into the tanks and become one with the people.
 
I've read a lot about this kind of thing off and on because of stuff like Caitlyn Doughty, the death positive movement, alternative/green funerals etc. The Recomposition thing has been in the works for a long time. A lot of people will see it as liberal elites telling us to eat bugs and not reproduce. It's not personally how I would treat my loved ones bodies unless it's what they wanted.

There's a group of people who feel that rotting and "becoming one with the earth" is deeply spiritual. Pretty hippy but it's harmless. In recomp, people really desire to become plant food. But there is already natural burial directly in the earth or with a biodegradable casket and/shroud. I don't think they are different in outcome. Either way, you will go back to the earth.

It feels almost like a decomposition fetish in that way. But I think there should be more options for getting rid of dead bodies, especially in an environmentally friendly way. If someone wants to pay for this, let them.

It would probably be more useful to legalize water cremation in more states and countries if you really want to reduce the impact of the funeral industry. Recomposition has niche hippy appeal. Water cremation though is less toxic and more appealing to the average person because you get remains to put in an urn or interment like you would with regular fire cremation. It's also affordable with similar prices to regular cremation.

I'm guessing this Seattle dyke is going to charge an insane amount of money just to turn bodies into compost and then bury them in a memorial garden. Which could really be done for free... embalming and funerals outside the home have only been standard for a couple hundred yrs. For most of history in most parts of the world, "natural burial" was just burial.
On May 21, 2019, Washington State’s Governor Jay Inslee signed SB 5001 which legalizes natural organic reduction, or “the contained, accelerated conversion of human remains to soil”. The law will go into effect on May 1, 2020.

According to the website, this is what the process is called in technical, legal terms.
 
Last edited:
So... let the bodies decompose in the ground to feed... the grass, I guess.

I can't believe this person wasted brain space holding this idea for 13 years.
 
The process involves laying the body in a closed vessel with woodchips, alfalfa and straw grass. The body is slowly rotated to allow microbes to break it down.
Hippies literally spinning in their graves.
 
i remember some guy being buried along a tree that grew - kinda- on him after he died, that seems a cool way to go after you kick the bucket. i guess this might be the same?
 
She claims that natural organic reduction of a body prevents 1.4 tonnes of carbon being released into the atmosphere, compared with cremation. And she believes there is a similar saving compared to traditional burial when transportation and the construction of the casket is taken into account.

If someone wants you to buy something for them, check their claims (especially if they sound like obvious lies).

If you want a carbon neutral funeral just get berried at sea. You get recycled and it is much less gross.

Prof Carpenter-Boggs found that the recomposing body reached temperatures of 55C (131F) for a period of time.

Between 40 and 140F is considered the temperature bacteria grow best IIRC. That is why you want to check your meat to make sure they are above 145 or whatever, 131F isn't enough to actually kill bacteria.

I'm not a biochemist, doctor, or chef so you could defer to the professor on this one. I'm probably wrong >_>
 
So... let the bodies decompose in the ground to feed... the grass, I guess.

I can't believe this person wasted brain space holding this idea for 13 years.
Not very creative, is it? There are other novel eco-friendly burial options like memorial reefs to provide habitat for endangered fish, "become a tree/plant" urns where the ashes are buried with the sapling and help nourish it and become part of it, water cremation and Promession (freeze drying a corpse and then the powder left over is equal to ashes in a normal cremation),
 
The numbers don't make much sense. "Save a ton of carbon"? Where's the ton of carbon in a burial? Bury a wooden casket and you're keeping it out of the carbon cycle. And cremation uses energy equivalent to a few kg of gasoline.
 
She claims that natural organic reduction of a body prevents 1.4 tonnes of carbon being released into the atmosphere, compared with cremation. And she believes there is a similar saving compared to traditional burial when transportation and the construction of the casket is taken into account.
So the raison d'etre of her whole company is just some numbers sourced squarely out of her ass.

The professor they cite is part of the "Organic and Sustainable Agriculture" program at Washington State University (the mutant step-child the rest of the College of Agriculture is embarrassed by). They are leading the nation in green propaganda bullshit. All they really do is test various things like soil microbes or whatever on organic farms and get them published in papers. Just raw data stuff. Said papers are then cited by the movement to say "it works!". The papers don't actually say that.
 
We should toss everyone into a volcano tbh. I aint taking chances with the undead.
 
Back
Top Bottom