Opinion Huey Long Was Wrong

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

Huey Long Was Wrong​

By ELLEN CARMICHAEL
August 1, 2021 6:30 AM
B2B4FAF7-BF60-42F1-A79D-C5CE0BA9E44C.jpeg
Nearly a century after his death, the Kingfish is making a comeback. Fans of the late Louisiana politician Huey P. Long can be found across the partisan divide, with populist conservatives and socialist Democrats embracing his message of economic equality under the banner of “Every man a king.” These days, he’s even a featured character in Hearts of Iron 4, a computer wargame, and he’s developed a cult following among gamers.

Evidence of Long’s peculiar cultural resurrection can be found on the left in universal-income advocates such as Andrew Yang and avowedly socialist lawmakers such as Bernie Sanders. Just swap out “Share the Wealth” for $1,000 checks and retaliating against Standard Oilfor targeting “millionaires and billionaires,” and the Kingfish lives again.

Among Democrats and the left-wing intelligentsia, that’s to be expected. They crave a return to the era of Long and FDR, a time of big social programs and greater economic parity. (Nearly everyone being poor makes things miserable but equal.) But conservatives tempted by the lure of populism’s nostalgia would do well to choose different heroes to emulate — and reconsider their policies altogether.

In a May column for American Greatness, writer Pedro Gonzales waxed poetic about Long, directing modern-day conservatives to seize his political “blueprint” as their own. The Kingfish, Gonzales claimed, “actually was what Donald Trump only pretended to be” — a successful fighter for the common man. Coming from one of the most Trump-centric outlets on the right, it was an eye-opening assertion.

In his hagiography of Long, Gonzales implies that the politician fought for the working class because his “poor white” upbringing gave him an understanding of human suffering. But, in the true spirit of a good grift, the backstory Long told about himself — and Long apologists still tell today — is a lie. Though on the campaign trail, he led voters to believe that he was raised poor in a log cabin, he was actually born to an affluent family who lived on a sprawling estate in north Louisiana. Throughout an adulthood spent in public life, Long would lament to crowds that he was as poor as they were, even as he lived lavishly on the taxpayer dime, indulging his penchants for extravagant clothes, luxury homes, booze, and fine dining.

Like so many populist politicians, Long rose by grabbing power through corrupt and violent means. Political opponents went missing, and some were nearly killed. Those brave enough to speak against him or his policies saw their families threatened and their livelihoods destroyed. Civil-service positions at every level of the state government were available only to those who vocally backed him, leaving would-be workers with scant political choices during the nation’s worst depression. Those lucky enough to have government jobs watched week after week as percentages of their paychecks were automatically sent to Long’s infamous “deduct box” to fund his political ambitions. When newspapers refused to print Long’s propaganda, he had the legislature establish a state printing board that could deny them “official printer” status, and started his own paper.

Throughout his time in politics, Long clearly saw himself as outside and above the law. He once declared, “I am the Constitution now,” signaling to anyone who dared question him that he was too powerful to be tamed by laws, ethics, or even basic manners. He named himself the state’s chief lawyer, drawing an additional salary for representing Louisiana in court. He appointed cronies to plush taxpayer-funded roles he created, all the while summarily removing anti-Long or Long-agnostic government officials from their posts. He bullied the state legislature, often with loyalty oaths backed by bribes and threats, to pass his desired legislation without even reading or debating it. And on the off chance the legislature wouldn’t approve his building projects, Long would simply order construction to begin, which it then did.

During his tenure as governor, Long practically eliminated local governance, as municipal and parish officials were forced to go to Baton Rouge to beg for financial support for their community projects. He stripped local leaders of most of their authority, with special punishments exacted upon the mayor of New Orleans, whom he deeply resented.

The Kingfish made no secret that he sought total control, often bragging openly about his success in centralizing all of Louisiana’s government under his command. Even after he left the governorship for the U.S. Senate, he still maintained total authority over the state legislature, as he or one of his henchmen would monitor and direct daily activities in the chambers. In his early years in Washington, Long’s national aspirations grew, and he was seen as a formidable opponent to President Roosevelt, eager to push the Democratic Party further left and the country in an even more populist direction. Still, he kept a keen eye on the tyrannical regime he had established back home.

Despite the overwhelming evidence of the evils of Long’s reign, present-day Longites on both the left and right seem all too eager to paint him as merely an eccentric politician from the “good ol’ days.” For them, the lesson of Long’s career is that a ruthless approach to politics can be effective at achieving big things for the little guy. They point to Long’s aggression toward the “ruling class,” even though he was the most pompous and vicious ruler of all, as proof that politicians who champion the cause of the common man will reap great political rewards.

In happier times, most conservatives would find such an instinct repulsive and antithetical to Americans’ belief in justice and fairness under the law. Now, a growing contingent of populists seems to find Long’s tactics worth celebrating and replicating. In American Greatness, Gonzales argued that the Right should “embrace [Long’s] method, his spiritedness, his willingness to fight dirty against corrupt elites who only yelp for civility and constitutionalism when they’re losing.”

Those convinced that Long’s depraved means justified his ends couldn’t be more wrong. Long’s abysmal legacy is that of a tyrant who spent his career bending government to achieve his corrupt aims and grooming generations of populist standard-bearers.

Louisiana is rich in natural resources. It maintains one of the world’s most important ports. It enjoys a vibrant agricultural sector. It has world-class entertainment, wildlife wonders, and a proud, unique history. Yet even today, it ranks at or near the bottom of all states by most quality-of-life metrics.

U.S. News and World Report ranks it last among the 50 states. It grades Louisiana as 46th in health care, 48th in education, 47th in economy, 47th in infrastructure, 48th in opportunity, 42nd in fiscal stability, and 50th in crime and corrections. Louisianans, especially young professionals, are fleeing the state, and a recent study placed it at 44th in the country for outmigration. Nineteen percent of Louisianans languish at or below the poverty line, including 27 percent of children. Violence is out of control. Jobs, even in the state’s traditionally strong chemical-manufacturing and energy sectors, are disappearing.

There are states with far fewer assets that perform far better than Louisiana does. The source of the state’s struggles is a political culture shaped by Huey Long. A 2015 analysis by FiveThirtyEight found that Louisiana remained the most corrupt state in America. Long-era systems that effectively tie the hands of the state legislature and make local-government officials useless are still in place. There are few efforts to diversify the state’s economy, with politicians instead largely focused on picking political winners and losers, and educated Louisianans are leaving the state for better opportunities in Houston, Atlanta, and elsewhere. The glimmering roads and bridges Long erected have long since decayed, and Louisianans are left instead with infrastructure more characteristic of the Third World than the United States.

For all his populist promises, the reality of living under Long was a painful one, and the damage he did to Louisiana has never fully been repaired. During his time in politics, he hurt a lot of people, eroded important civic institutions, and enacted policies that even today leave Louisianans far behind. He also normalized a particularly corrupt, dishonest political template that would be followed to great success by, among others, the recently deceased Edwin Edwards, who served time in federal prison after the last of his record four terms as governor. Long was not merely a caricature of a bygone political era, a tough-talking everyman willing to wield the hammer of justice against the greedy and the cruel. He was a self-serving crook, a career politician whose progressive ideals and policies have stunted his state for nearly a century. Neither he nor his methods are worthy of admiration or replication, especially by conservatives who should have enough ethics and sense to know better.
 
Huey Long would have initiated the Night of the Long Journos if he were alive today and that is why they fear him
 
Huey Long gives me a fucking boner. I won't hear a bad word about that man. You know who you want on your side? The biggest, fattest, most corrupt ideologue you can find. I don't give a shit.
 
Huey Long is my favorite politician. Fuck all of these Journos and faggots saying this shit.
 
In his hagiography of Long, Gonzales implies that the politician fought for the working class because his “poor white” upbringing gave him an understanding of human suffering. But, in the true spirit of a good grift, the backstory Long told about himself — and Long apologists still tell today — is a lie. Though on the campaign trail, he led voters to believe that he was raised poor in a log cabin, he was actually born to an affluent family who lived on a sprawling estate in north Louisiana. Throughout an adulthood spent in public life, Long would lament to crowds that he was as poor as they were, even as he lived lavishly on the taxpayer dime, indulging his penchants for extravagant clothes, luxury homes, booze, and fine dining.

Like so many populist politicians, Long rose by grabbing power through corrupt and violent means. Political opponents went missing, and some were nearly killed. Those brave enough to speak against him or his policies saw their families threatened and their livelihoods destroyed. Civil-service positions at every level of the state government were available only to those who vocally backed him, leaving would-be workers with scant political choices during the nation’s worst depression. Those lucky enough to have government jobs watched week after week as percentages of their paychecks were automatically sent to Long’s infamous “deduct box” to fund his political ambitions. When newspapers refused to print Long’s propaganda, he had the legislature establish a state printing board that could deny them “official printer” status, and started his own paper.
No, I think everyone's aware of this.

They're also aware that any other politician with notoriety rivaling or surpassing Long's do much of the same thing.
 
You'll wish there was a new Huey Long to save you once National Review gets deplatformed and sued into oblivion for hate speech. Better just keep losing with dignity.
 
No, I think everyone's aware of this.

They're also aware that any other politician with notoriety rivaling or surpassing Long's do much of the same thing.
I'm old enough to remember Romney's stupid ass bragging about the bologna sandwiches he and his wife used to eat -- as though being poor just means you live in a smaller house and eat bologna sandwiches.

At least Huey communicated some kind of empathy. He lied, but he wasn't out of touch.
 
I unironically have a picture of him on my wall and own a signature of his. A dictator with a heart for his people. White, Black, whatever, it didn't matter to him as long as you had the tools available to become a productive member of society. I'm sure many black families who lived under his administration would have strong opinions about this article. Even FDR said that The New Deal could be stealing some of Longs thunder. The name has been tainted, but he was basically the political definition of a "National Socialist". If we did not ever have the NSDAP coin the term, I think he would have been a more apt person to put the label on, policy wise anyway. He continues to influence my opinions on American politics to this day and I don't see that changing anytime soon. "Every man a King.." indeed.
 
I don't agree with everything he did, and I question the long-term sustainability of some of his ideas, but any man that causes the journalist class and the elites they serve to seethe and dilate, such a man is a chad in my book!

M3K67D5PQ3F4I3SUCMMS2WMEBY.jpg
 
Huey Long was a massively corrupt grifter/self-promoter. In that sense he's like a Trump with balls, or Putin as he is, so it makes perfect sense meme-conservatives online would love him.

Aside from his authoritarian political tactics, which I don't really mind since Leftist aren't real people, he just wasted a ton of money living a lavish lifestyle. Had the State of Louisiana fly his favorite bartender up to Jew York City, at state expense, to serve him. That's just the one story that comes to mind, but basically, if you read much biography of him (I haven't read a full biography, just one chapter out of a book on American populism) he comes across as a jackass.
 
Neither he nor his methods are worthy of admiration or replication, especially by conservatives who should have enough ethics and sense to know better.
Then why did you waste time writing a long* diatribe about a man that you don’t think should be memorialized?

*no pun intended
 
Did Huey Long lie and do things out of his own self interests? Yes. But did he pissed off the journos and ruling class elites? Yes. Did he love the people of Louisiana and wanted to help them? Yes and yes. Huey Long may have been a complicated person but he is one of the few people who have ever lived in these fine United States since it's inception nearly in past 250 years that I could respect. The same could not be said for this dumb journo bitch from the national review.
 
Last edited:
Let me just remind you, when Huey Long was shot, his last words were either:

"God, don't let me die I still have so much to do."

or

"Who is going to take care of my boys now?" (This referred to poor Louisanans he sent off to college and shit).

Is any modern politician going to remember you with their dying words? No. Fuck you, nat review, you bunch of conservative faggots. Can't stand that a Dem does more than you. You're just like the fucking liberal progressives. OH NO, HE HAS A D NEXT TO HIS NAME, GOTTA SHIT TALK HIM.

Shut the fuck up. Just shut your fucking mouths. Huey Long was larger than life. Did he enrich himself? Yes. But he also enriched the people. That's what he used his power for. And the elites and journo class HATED HIM FOR IT.

How about EVERY MAN A KING. Suck a dick journo cunts.

 
I don't agree with everything he did, and I question the long-term sustainability of some of his ideas, but any man that causes the journalist class and the elites they serve to seethe and dilate, such a man is a chad in my book!

View attachment 2401279
Didn't we already get Huey Long Mk. 2 with Trump? Just instead of "Every Man a King" we got "Every Man a Shitposter".
 
One of the primary reasons that Louisiana is perpetually fucked is that the state's oil and gas royalty rates are half as much as Texas' since all the extraction is happening on federally owned lands in LA, as opposed to private lands in TX. Also half the federal royalties go to the treasury instead of the state, so it's essentially 1/4th as much per barrel as TX. That ain't Huey Long doin it, breh.
 
Back
Top Bottom