- Joined
- May 2, 2020
- Nope. There's more creativity in turning the Myer's house into a roadside attraction and using found-footage cameras or remaking the series under a grindhouse thematic and tone, and they both ranged from meh to bad. This is no different.Because its the most creative the series has been in probably decades.
- It's unoriginal as dirt. "What makes a person snap" is such a cliche and by-the-numbers attempt at psych 101. It's been done to death.
- It has no place in a Halloween film. Myers is literally the worst slasher icon to apply this cringe to. He does not have an MO nor a reason; he is pure evil. He cannot be reasoned with or bargained with. Rob Zombie tried to humanize Michael 15 years ago and it bit him in the ass.
- It's painfully executed. Why are you switching gears in the last act? You already committed to an angle; finish it. You don't swerve the audience with a payout that is completely lacking and antithesis to the franchise and current trilogy. It's akin to making everyone in Ends suddenly rock Osiris footwear and wear JNCO jeans while uttering 00's slang, and have the excuse for it be "hey it's creative and it subverts expectations!"
So which is it; is it bad or is it not?Anything after 2018 was going to be bad, that's just reality.
"It's actually good but if you disagree hey it was always going to be bad" sounds like doublethink.
They announced the trilogy before the 2018 film even began. The films were planned as a trilogy from pre-production because Blumhouse was interested in multiple films and because the original script had a longer, detailed story in mind.I knew it once they inevitably announced Kills.
The sequels were not tacked on as an afterthought. They were always meant to be there.
Ok Brianna Wu.Ends is intriguing and ballsy considering that the original objective was to ground Myers and bring him back to basics going into the 2018 film.
Last edited: