Someone here posted a picture of a comic made by some christian organization back in the early 00s. It picked my interest and I looked for their documentary about Harry Potter called "Harry Potter Witchcraft Repacked" by Jeremiah Films. I watched the whole 1 hour and 6 minutes.
I think some things they said where badly interpreted, but others things were certainly spot on. In summary, they explained that Harry Potter is very similar to the Marihuana to hard drugs pipeline. The books in on itself wasn't hard satanic, but it could be the gateway for many kids to the new era stuff and paganism in general. Parents were afraid that children couldn't discern innocent fantasy (although J.K. baseline for her world is strongly rooted in true mithology and witchcraft practices) from real world new age stuff, and so they would try to learn more about how to make spell and shit on the internet or through friends and such. And it really resonated with me. If you had ever been in any Harry Potter website forum, there's a lot of people (specially women) who also overlap with things like Wicca, astrology and that stuff. At the end of the day, Christan families had to think about how even though Harry Potter was a fictional work, it also was filled with symbols, themes and ethics that could never align with their values. But the war was to protect their children. I think they didn't want to set J.K. on fire.
The new HP war 2.0, Attack of the Troons is really different. The Harry Potter is fertile ground for their values and philosophy, the devs even accommodate identity shit to appease them. But they simply don't care. J.K simply stated biological woman should still have their own space and to not blur the distinction between gender and sex. She said that autistic girls can be manipulated into becoming trans, and they should not take serious medical shit on their bodies that are irreversible. So she's a political enemy. Parents fighted because they wanted to protect children, in ther view, from Harry Potter. Trannies fight because they hate J.K. Rowling. I think they hate her not only for who she is, but also because what she represents. She got the balls to brake their illusion for a hot second.
At the end people didn't care and the masses consumed their shiny product happily. I wasn't really mature enough to understand the situation back then in the 00s, but I wonder if people bought the books with the same guilt some people nowadays buy copies of the game due to the (failed) boycott.
Sorry if this post was too long and dispersed, but I've got this in my mind and I wanted to leave it somewhere.