🐱 Hitler book maps 'Final Solution in Canada'

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
CatParty
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/hitler-book-library-and-archives-canada-1.4989961

upload_2019-1-24_9-24-30.png


A book that once belonged to Adolf Hitler — and sheds light on the Nazis' plans for North America had the Second World War gone the other way — is now in the collection of Library and Archives Canada (LAC).

The book, entitled Statistik, Presse und Organisationen des Judentums in den Vereinigten Staaten und Kanada (Statistics, Press, and Organizations of Jewry in the United States and Canada), is a detailed census of Jewish populations and organizations in North American cities.

"This information would have been the building blocks to rolling out the Final Solution in Canada," said LAC curator Michael Kent.

Major urban centres including Montreal and Toronto are on the list, but so are smaller communities such as Trois-Rivières, Que., which at the time had a Jewish population of just 52, according to the book.

The 137-page book was commissioned by the Nazis and was written by Heinz Kloss, a researcher who worked for organizations that supported the Third Reich.

Kloss was a linguist who lived in the United States in 1936-37, just prior to the war. He likely compiled the information through his connections with Nazi sympathizers and other researchers in North America.

"[Kloss] had a very good network and relationship with researchers around the world," Kent said.

upload_2019-1-24_9-25-7.png


"He's probably compiling from a range of secondary sources that he's getting from his contacts in North America," Kent said.

The book was published in 1944 and was likely stored in Hitler's alpine retreat near Berchtesgaden, Germany, according to Kent.

Inside the front cover is a bookplate inscribed with the Latin phrase "Ex Libris Adolf Hitler," a clue to its owner.

upload_2019-1-24_9-25-37.png


"The bookplate is the main giveaway — that was a plate he put on all his books that were in his residences," Kent said.

It's estimated Hitler amassed somewhere in between 6,000 and 16,000 books during his life.

This book was likely taken by allied troops as a souvenir before making its way to a collector in the United States from whom LAC purchased it for roughly $6,000, Kent said.

A 'creepy item'
When the book appeared on LAC's radar, Kent said curators struggled with the moral implications of purchasing it. Other institutions including the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum refuse to buy items owned by Nazis.

Ultimately, Kent said, LAC decided to purchase the book because of the prevalence of Holocaust denial and xenophobia.

"While this is certainly a creepy item, the decision to acquire it was simple," he said. "The chance to acquire an item like this reminds us of ... the role we play in ensuring the memory of the Holocaust is preserved."

The Simon Wiesenthal Center for Holocaust Studies is supporting LAC's purchase.

Rather than being in the hands of groups like neo-Nazis, it is better the book is somewhere where it can be studied, said president and CEO Avi Benlolo.

"We didn't know this piece of history and now we do because the library bought it."

The book also brings that dark period home for Canadians, Kent said.

"While we talk about the Holocaust as a European event ... I think what this item does is reminds us as Canadians that conflicts and human tragedies that seem far away can actually come to Canada."

LAC actually purchased the book in June, but only unveiled it Wednesday after months of careful restoration.

LAC will host a International Holocaust Remembrance Day commemoration on Sunday, where the book will be displayed.
 
Even plans to invade Britain were only meant as a last resort if Germany could not force Britain into peace.
The precondition to enacting Operation Sea Lion was having complete superiority both in the water and the air over the English Channel and even then they didn't consider the chances of success to be very high.

In that light, the idea that Germany might have had any kind of genuine plan to invade the USA or Canada is just ludicrous and as you said, there might have been some vague draft for such a plan, but noone would have ever dreamed of actually enacting it.
At most, they might expect a possibility of waging war against the USA and Canada way after winning WW2 some time down the line, in case those nations tried to free Europe. But even so, the main strategy to deal with that would most likely be "Shittons of artillery batteries on the coastline".
I simply don't believe that Hitler would have even humored the thought of attacking and invading a place so far away, given how much manpower it would demand and the utter lack of trans-antlantic force projection.
And once you look at the plans for invading britain...yeah shit begins to fall apart even before you reach open ocean. Literally, since the plan mandated use of literal river boats to paddle over the channel into enemy fire which would have been about the worst possible start to any invasion since they would have probably fallen apart mid transit if the weather was bad enough, so the idea of a cross ocean invasion is about as feasible as an invasion of russia via burrowing under poland.

Which makes perfect sense when you consider that war with Britain was something Hitler had been really fucking desperate to avoid and thus had not planned/geared for in the slightest before war broke out. Hell halfway through the war he was still going ahead with the mindset of "ok once we get britain to stop fighting us and become our ally, then we can...." and this further indicates how any idea of him planning to conquer Canada is pure fantasy.

As for why Hitler hitched so much on not being at war with Britain, while much has been made of this being due to racial ideology and Hitler being a longtime admirer of the British Empire the actual reasoning seems far more pragmatic and simple. Britain controlled the seas around Europe and beyond, and in the event of war would be able to blockade Germany and prevent the importation of needed resources for the war machine along with food and other essential supplies, with the most vital resource by far being Oil.

In the First World War this had been an absolutely devastating tactic that was one of the major factors in the Central Powers losing. In this new era where war was infinitely more dependant on huge numbers of machines not only for combat but for transport, logistics, and production....yeah this would pretty much ensure German defeat in the long term unless they were able to deal a knock-out blow against the USSR, quickly steal their resources and oil, and then using this new resource base grind Britain to an armistice. Such a knock-out blow against the Soviets was something which they only had a few years after the start of war with Britain to do before their oil reserves effectively ran dry, and this is why the dangerously flawed Operation Barbarossa went into action with Britain still in the war despite everyone in high command knowing how risky it was even before the nightmare of a two-front war is factored in, and once the rush to the Caucasus oil fields failed it was game over.

If Britain was an ally of the Third Reich or even just a neutral power, then Germany would be absolutely fucking untouchable from the west and would gain access to resources and markets that would make war against the Soviets a far more simple and stress-free matter* since it would have far more time to prepare for the invasion without the worry of running out of oil, far more military might that could be brought to the front since logistics would be far better and there would be no serious troop concentrations in the west, and far more freedom to make mistakes without said mistakes irrevocably fucking up the war effort since the war against the Soviets could now be sustained instead of being so utterly dependant on seizing resources to succeed. Plus there would be no RAF bombing factories and infrastructure to shit**, no need to divert vast resources to both the u-boat programme and the Atlantic Wall, and no Enigma being cracked with the resulting intel sent to the USSR

Ofcourse since Hitler didn't know the meaning of patience, and his main source on British public/political opinion was the literal autist Ribbentrop***, war with Britain happened and all his plans for a lengthy well resourced build up against the USSR went up in smoke.

* In theory atleast. Remember that even if they lost the Caucasus and other resource critical areas like Ukraine and had no lend-lease shit funnelled to them by Britain, they would still be fighting a literal war of survival and would still be capable of sustaining insane losses and coming back swinging.
** IIRC about 40% or so of German military production was lost due to RAF and later USAF bombings
*** Who might not only be the worst diplomat in human history, but who may well have cost Germany the war because of how bad his foreign policy advice to Hitler was
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom