US Hildawg 2020 Megathread - She rules out 2020 run, but says 'I'm not going anywhere'

  • Thread starter Thread starter RG 448
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
she’s considering another presidential run, telling a New York City audience on Friday that she would be well suited to the office.

During a far-ranging interview with Kara Swisher of the technology website Recode(Ms. Swisher is also a contributor to The Times’s Opinion section), Mrs. Clinton initially said “no” when asked whether she wanted to run for president again. She then paused and repeated “no.”

But after Ms. Swisher noted the slight hesitation, Mrs. Clinton seemed to reconsider her response, saying that a major task of the next Democratic president will be improving the international standing of the United States.

“Well, I’d like to be president,” she said, during the public taping at the 92nd Street Y of Ms. Swisher’s podcast. "The work would be work that I feel very well prepared for having been at the Senate for eight years, having been a diplomat in the State Department, and it’s just going to be a lot of heavy lifting.”

Mrs. Clinton has become a more visible presence in recent weeks, increasing the number of her public appearances and raising money for Democrats across the country. Last week, she spoke at a fund-raiser for Donna Shalala, a former Clinton administration official, who is running for a House seat in Florida.

“She will always be a winner and I’ll always be with her,” said Ms. Shalala, introducing Mrs. Clinton to a room full of 200 Democratic donors in Miami.

Mrs. Clinton said she wouldn’t consider a possible run in 2020 until after the midterm elections next week.

“I’m not even going to even think about it until we get through this Nov. 6 election,” she said. “But I’m going to do everything in my power to make sure we have a Democrat in the White House come January of 2021.”

Should she mount a third presidential bid, Mrs. Clinton would be entering a Democratic field crowded with potential contenders, a major shift from 2016, when nearly no Democrats were eager to challenge her.

Mrs. Clinton said she expects a crowded field of as many as 20 Democrats.

“I think we’d have a number of excellent candidates who would be really formidable on the campaign trail, but let’s wait and see who it is,” she said. "I’m just going to wait and watch what happens.”

Mrs. Clinton dismissed some of the calls for her to retreat from public life as sexist.

“There were no articles telling Al Gore to go away or John Kerry to go away or John McCain or Mitt Romney to go away,” she said. “Mitt Romney is going to the Senate, that’s where he’s going.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/29/...njrGrvSt4OQXEaaRhIucX1lF0uxBqgQZE1z56E4Giq7xU
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One of the reasons why Trump beat Hillary was because a lot of people were convinced that she was going to win and it was a widespread belief on both sides that Hillary Clinton had it "in the bag" right up until Election Night. Naturally, a lot of people who would've otherwise voted Democrat just stayed home.

While Clinton's sheer unlikable nature and the way Bernie was so fucked over in the primaries did go a long way in her 2016 defeat, the overconfidence of the Democratic voter base that year did play a role in her defeat as well.
Have we actually seen evidence of people not voting because they were sure she had it in the bag? I hear that thrown around but it doesn't seem like that overconfidence of the voting body should have played that much of a role in depressing the vote- afterall, by voting for her you 1) were part of a histotic first by electing a woman to president, 2) stuck it to the orange bad man, and 3) the vote is never certain, if you want someone or some legislation to succeed you have to vote.
I don't doubt that there were people who stayed at home disgusted by both candidates, but I don't think I've seen evidence that (large enough amounts) people just didn't vote because they thought it was a sure thing. It just seems like it downplays the fervor of her supporters, who were pretty adamant about their support.
 
I don't doubt that there were people who stayed at home disgusted by both candidates, but I don't think I've seen evidence that (large enough amounts) people just didn't vote because they thought it was a sure thing. It just seems like it downplays the fervor of her supporters, who were pretty adamant about their support.

And some of the loudest Orange Man Bad people openly admitted they didn't even vote.
 
As someone who was forced to endure Hillary Clinton as Senator for the state of New York I hope with all my being that this decrepit and mentally unfit political whore runs for President in 2020 so I can watch her be humiliated when she loses one more time. No amount of Orange Man Bad or pussy grabbing tapes will make Hillary President.
 
And some of the loudest Orange Man Bad people openly admitted they didn't even vote.
In "fairness" how many of those people live in New York or California therefore making their votes ultimately meaningless?
That's not excusing them or to say that "muh Popular Vote" has any validity as an argument though.
 
And what the fuck would change in 2020? Loud Mouth lazy fucks are gonna be Loud Mouth lazy fucks.

I recently had a conversation where I had to point out that '2016 will teach everyone that it's important to vote' was just silly because all the same things were said in 2001.
 
I don't know... Hillary entering at his late stage might actually not work out as well as she might hope.

She already has a lot of baggage from basically fucking over Bernie last time around. This time, she would basically be pissing off *everyone* who was actually in favor of Sanders, Biden, Harris, Warren, etc, by essentially just getting handed the DNC nomination without participating in the debates or anything.

She might inspire a lot of protest votes, or protest non-votes anyways.
 
She might inspire a lot of protest votes, or protest non-votes anyways.
>Implying voters matter

The DNC and her cronies in various states will protect her. And the Billionares who are afraid Liz Warren will win, and are afraid Sleepy Joe is to damaged to beat Trump will give her a ton of cash

And EVERYONE has been carrying her water promoting HER narratives for 4 years....Its still her turn

I think the Oct 16 thing is just going to be an endorsement .
Warren has a very good chance of winning the nomination so she doesn't need to drop out.
Warren doesn't seem suicidal so she wont pick HRC as her VP.

Hillary IS one of the Wall Street Billionaires...Warren is against her financial interest
 
>Implying voters matter

The DNC and her cronies in various states will protect her. And the Billionares who are afraid Liz Warren will win, and are afraid Sleepy Joe is to damaged to beat Trump will give her a ton of cash

And EVERYONE has been carrying her water promoting HER narratives for 4 years....Its still her turn



Hillary IS one of the Wall Street Billionaires...Warren is against her financial interest

No amount of cash is going to beat Trump. It just isn't. Trump's resources are essentially infinite.

He either has to be beaten legitimately - unlikely - or through outright cheating. Which, hey, that's the DNC's game, but we'll see how that works out.
 
No amount of cash is going to beat Trump. It just isn't. Trump's resources are essentially infinite.

He either has to be beaten legitimately - unlikely - or through outright cheating. Which, hey, that's the DNC's game, but we'll see how that works out.

Oh who said anything about CASH

Google, FB, etc all shadowbanning pro-trump stuff twice as hard as before
 
Have we actually seen evidence of people not voting because they were sure she had it in the bag? I hear that thrown around but it doesn't seem like that overconfidence of the voting body should have played that much of a role in depressing the vote- afterall, by voting for her you 1) were part of a histotic first by electing a woman to president, 2) stuck it to the orange bad man, and 3) the vote is never certain, if you want someone or some legislation to succeed you have to vote.
I don't doubt that there were people who stayed at home disgusted by both candidates, but I don't think I've seen evidence that (large enough amounts) people just didn't vote because they thought it was a sure thing. It just seems like it downplays the fervor of her supporters, who were pretty adamant about their support.
That's a sword that cuts both ways, though.

An unknown number of moderate, Trump-leaning voters could just as well have stayed home since all the media and all their friends convinced them that voting for Trump was pointless, since Shillary had it in the bag.

I suspect that was a larger demographic, but who knows.
 
I want to see hillary get into a fist fight with elizabeth warren and then someone drops a piano on both of them

trump could use the sound of the piano falling on them as his campaign song
 
Back
Top Bottom