I think racebending is a much more nuanced concept than it gets credit for.
I’ve noticed that racebending has become much more controversial in the last several years compared to how it was perceived in prior decades. There are examples of well known characters being racebent from white to non-white and not inspiring the controversy we see now.
It would have been because those unidentified examples of yours occurred, as you claim, "in prior decades," before the Left began openly proclaiming a full-spectrum war on whites in every arena of popular culture and public life. Whites could then still convincingly delude themselves into thinking that instances of established fictional white characters being blackwashed (as was mostly the case) was simply an effort to throw the poor, downtrodden dears a bone, so to speak, rather than part of a steadily-advancing drive towards complete white erasure.
I think that it’s possible to racebend a fictional character and still be respectful of their history. A key problem with many of these recent racebendings is that they make tons of other mistakes that end up sabotaging any attempts at genuinely non-vengeful representation. Then the creators blame racism when that has nothing to do with it.
I don't believe that there are any modern attempts at race-replacing white characters that are "respectful of their history."
It’s normal for reboots to explore new incarnations of characters in different but similar ways. Such as Renegades Snake-Eyes being raised by the Arashikage as a child. Does the show ruin his character by doing that instead of replacing him with a new character?
That's pushing the goalpost rather conveniently far away. How about asking, instead, if it
weakened his character. That would be a more honest gambit.
There’s the issue of hard limits on how many characters you can adequately explore at a time. Do you want a cast of entirely new characters a la Beast Wars to be the norm for new entries long-running franchises just to avoid racebending white characters?
You're presenting a false dichotomy here. Not every franchise
needs to have a racially "diverse" cast, and many are completely inimical to such a thing (if you care about preserving verisimilitude at all) simply by virtue of the setting.
Racebending Velma to Asian-American in Scooby-Doo didn’t ruin her character. (Unless you count making her an Asian nerd stereotype. But I digress.) She’s still recognizable as the same mousy brunette we all know and love.
This is pretty much begging the question "why have white characters at all?" Apparently, to your mind, there's no inherent value to their existing as such, unlike that which you assign to Play!Hermione below.
J.K. Rowling (I know, I know) had no problem retroactively racebending Hermione. She’s still the nerdy girl we all know and love. Being black also adds another layer of allegory to her subplot involving being a muggleborn and overcoming racism in the wizarding world.
No, actually. Making Hermione black, much like casting black actors as elves in the Netflix version of
The Witcher, has the effect of reducing the real-world resonance of the character's trials and tribulations to something extremely trite and narrow. Book!Hermione's struggle with prejudice from other wizards can resonate quite broadly over a wide range of potential parallels in the real world, because her situation isn't exactly comparable to anything in the real world, but make her (or
The Witcher's elves) black, and you've inextricably pigeonholed them into the incredibly over-exposed and threadbare dialectic of black oppression.
Creating an original non-white character and then slapping an established white character’s name on them for ham-fisted name recognition is obviously lazy and obtuse. But that’s different from carefully working racebending into the character’s backstory the same way that you work other traits into a rebooted incarnation of a character.
Writing with an axe to grind, in other words.
They could’ve just fleshed out Clamp Champ. They didn’t because they’re lazy. Usually, I wouldn’t assume this, but Ted from Netflix basically confirmed it himself.
Remember when the 2002
Masters of the Universe cartoon introduced a new character in the form of Man-at-Arms' predecessor and mentor, who was a gruff old black man, and everyone thought that this was cool and interesting and not controversial at all?
What about Miles Morales being Spider-Man, Calvin Ellis being Superman, or Eartha Kitt playing Catwoman? I don’t see why an Asian man can’t take up the mantle of Snake-Eyes in similar fashion.
Because the whole point of Snake Eyes is that he's
not Asian.
My suggestion for (partly) racebending Snake-Eyes to mixed race white/asian is more because I think it organically fits with a Renegades-style backstory (btw there’s no reason we can’t have multiple continuities), and because I think it would be cool to have an East Asian character who naturally has blond hair and blue eyes.
You wouldn't have an East Asian character, then. You'd have, rather, a mixed Asian/European character (who probably wouldn't look too much different than the average blond white person without recent East Asian genetic admixture).
Again, just make your own damn character.
Son, I don't know how to say this, but I don't think G.I. Joe is the franchise you're looking for.