💰 Grifter Hasan Piker / HasanAbi - Young Turk, Twitch Streamer, Stunlocked Brogressive, Cenk's Nephew, only a socialist for the money, abuses his dog by shocking it, Rutgers sex pest

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Ace888Ace said:
The old Napoleon maxim, never interrupt your enemy and all that.
Click to expand...
“Quand votre ennemi fait une faute, ne l’interrompez pas.”

When your enemy makes a mistake, don’t interrupt him.

Nice one. Although it’s hard to interrupt a raving screaming Turk – aka “the default mode” – anyways.
 
They modified the title to say to "Body Made for the 'Manosphere'" instead of "MAGA Body".

1745793519679.webp
 
Last edited:
he who has thus come/gone said:
I never said he should be prosecuted. Nor is it true that you can't prosecute someone for "saying stuff" in America. Of course you can criminally prosecute or civilly sue someone for "saying stuff"—it just depends on what is said, where it's said, and how it's said. But I never said Hasan could be held criminally or civilly liable for his statements, so I don't know what you're trying to say.
Click to expand...
You want to use the power of government to shut up Hasan Piker because you don't like the things that he says.

You can suddenly turn in Mr. Constitutional Law and get all pedantic about which specific tool of government you think could realistically be used to get *Jeff Bezos* to shut up Hasan Piker and how that's *technically* not the government going after someone for protected speech, sure. But you and I both know if the FBI kicked down Hasan's door and arrested him tomorrow based solely on the things he's said, you'd be thrilled.

I cannot stand this man but shit like this never ends well.
 
A Sentient Cloud said:
You want to use the power of government to shut up Hasan Piker because you don't like the things that he says.

You can suddenly turn in Mr. Constitutional Law and get all pedantic about which specific tool of government you think could realistically be used to get *Jeff Bezos* to shut up Hasan Piker and how that's *technically* not the government going after someone for protected speech, sure. But you and I both know if the FBI kicked down Hasan's door and arrested him tomorrow based solely on the things he's said, you'd be thrilled.

I cannot stand this man but shit like this never ends well.
Click to expand...
The best and most effective way to end Hasan Piker is to wait for the first rape allegation to show up, because 30 more will follow and the purity spiral the Left insists on will destroy his reputation.
 
A Sentient Cloud said:
You want to use the power of government to shut up Hasan Piker because you don't like the things that he says.

You can suddenly turn in Mr. Constitutional Law and get all pedantic about which specific tool of government you think could realistically be used to get *Jeff Bezos* to shut up Hasan Piker and how that's *technically* not the government going after someone for protected speech, sure. But you and I both know if the FBI kicked down Hasan's door and arrested him tomorrow based solely on the things he's said, you'd be thrilled.

I cannot stand this man but shit like this never ends well.
Click to expand...
Hasan is hated by many, left or right, because he can say or do shit that would get others permabanned, but its fine because the CEO likes him. If the government were to come in and somehow force him to be banned, it'd be dumb and and overreach, but not a surprise given what they've done elsewhere. I don't like Fuentes, but wasn't he on a no fly list for a while? Hasan fedposts and is in contact with terrorists/pirates and he's just fine.

This is again about rules being applied equally.
 
he who has thus come/gone said:
If I were Rick Scott, I'd be pushing for Congress to subpoena Jeff Bezos and then ask him to his face why he funds such a violent cretin. It's beyond cucked that Rick Scott hasn't done anything at all to that end, if only as a strategic move to take down a person with huge influence over a certain segment of terminally online young people. This type of retardation and cuckery is why leftist havens like Twitch can get away with their bullshit.
Click to expand...
People way overestimate Hassan's popularity outside of Twitch no one likes him and he is one of the most politically irrelevant people.

Why would Donald Trump even lower himself to talking about this low IQ Turkish homosexual.
He's more * than Katy Perry or any of these low IQ Modern pop Idols
 
A Sentient Cloud said:
You want to use the power of government to shut up Hasan Piker because you don't like the things that he says.
Click to expand...
I literally don't care. Hasan doesn't believe in constitutionalism or the principles of Free Speech for others, so I'm not going to afford him any grace at all. I want a retard to be laughed at and for other people to treat him like the retard he is. Anything else is just you making up words I didn't type, and I could not care less.
 
he who has thus come/gone said:
I literally don't care. Hasan doesn't believe in constitutionalism or the principles of Free Speech for others, so I'm not going to afford him any grace at all. I want a retard to be laughed at and for other people to treat him like the retard he is. Anything else is just you making up words I didn't type, and I could not care less.
Click to expand...
Only true based answer. I don't give a shit about people who beg the government to take away others freedoms when it inevitably swings that hammer back at them.
 
Tanuki Mixed Nuts said:
Hasan is hated by many, left or right, because he can say or do shit that would get others permabanned, but its fine because the CEO likes him. If the government were to come in and somehow force him to be banned, it'd be dumb and and overreach, but not a surprise given what they've done elsewhere. I don't like Fuentes, but wasn't he on a no fly list for a while? Hasan fedposts and is in contact with terrorists/pirates and he's just fine.

This is again about rules being applied equally.
Click to expand...
Exactly. If twitch wasn’t obviously putting its finger on the scale for Hasan. Even if we didn’t know for a fact that Dan Clancy supports Hasan, I would still believe that there were twitch employees using their positions to boost him. We know that there are media figures who are doing that too.

And they don’t just give Hasan help, they stifle any political streamers who go against Hasan. No matter what you think of Destiny, his ban was clearly unjustified. There’s a reason that the biggest non-Hasan political streamer is Asmongold. People were so desperate for an alternative to Hasan on twitch that wouldn’t get permabanned that they were willing to settle for the uneducated, ugly man who lives in his own filth.

Hasan is just the most obvious part of the problem. The whole rotten system that supports him and quashes everyone else is a threat to free speech when it operates in the shadows and unaccountable, and going after twitch leadership and Hasan is the best way to root it out.

There are more deranged leftists out there, people who I find even more loathsome than Hasan. Bad Empanada, for example. zei squirrel is another one. But I’m not calling for them to be silenced (though their IRL harassment and sock puppets should earn them many bans) because they aren’t being artificially boosted (except by being in Hasan’s periphery) and they aren’t siccing administrators on others in the way that Hasan is.
 
NYT have edited the article to crop out Hasan’s twitch chat, where chatters were fantasising about raping IDF women to death.
 
Last edited:
keke said:
NYT have edited the article to crop out Hasan’s twitch chat, where chatters were fantasising about raping IDF women to death.
Click to expand...
You really don't hate journos enough. "No!! Our precious puff piece might get compromised!"
 
It's interesting that they'd go so far as retroactively censoring themselves to sweep for him. There must be an upstream coordination going on to push Hasan on these various mainstream channels. Probably the DNC looking for someone, anyone who's young and hip and male and likes them. Makes more sense than astroturfing David Hogg, but only a little.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom