Halo MCC/Infinite/general Griefing thread - Six months, two maps, no refunds

What did you think of Infinite after the campaign showcase?

  • It looked good

  • Good, but they need to iron out some issues

  • Majorly apprehensive

  • It sucked donkey dick

  • I need to see more

  • I don't know

  • Craig monke

Results are only viewable after voting.
Arbiter said:
I'll talk about something men probably overlook: the enshitification of Cortana's hair.
Click to expand...
This is something I noticed too, for the record. I just didn't think anyone one would really care. Thanks for pointing that out, I hate it too and just goes to show, again, how little 343i understood about halo in all aspects.

But also, leave Halo 4 Cortana alone. She as a great as... personality.
 
Remember this the next time 343 and its fans virtue signal about how moral and ethical they are:

Screenshot 2026-04-04 at 8.53.36 AM.png
H1.jpg
H2.jpg
 
Last edited:

RCW 49.44.211​

Prohibited nondisclosure and nondisparagement provisions​

(1) A provision in an agreement by an employer and an employee not to disclose or discuss conduct, or the existence of a settlement involving conduct, that the employee reasonably believed under Washington state, federal, or common law to be illegal discrimination, illegal harassment, illegal retaliation, a wage and hour violation, or sexual assault, or that is recognized as against a clear mandate of public policy, is void and unenforceable. Prohibited nondisclosure and nondisparagement provisions in agreements concern conduct that occurs at the workplace, at work-related events coordinated by or through the employer, between employees, or between an employer and an employee, whether on or off the employment premises. Prohibited nondisclosure and nondisparagement provisions include those contained in employment agreements, independent contractor agreements, agreements to pay compensation in exchange for the release of a legal claim, or any other agreement between an employer and an employee.
(2) This section does not prohibit the enforcement of a provision in any agreement that prohibits the disclosure of the amount paid in settlement of a claim.
(3) It is a violation of this section for an employer to discharge or otherwise discriminate or retaliate against an employee for disclosing or discussing conduct that the employee reasonably believed to be illegal harassment, illegal discrimination, illegal retaliation, wage and hour violations, or sexual assault, that is recognized as illegal under state, federal, or common law, or that is recognized as against a clear mandate of public policy, occurring in the workplace, at work-related events coordinated by or through the employer, between employees, or between an employer and an employee, whether on or off the employment premises.
(4) It is a violation of this section for an employer to request or require that an employee enter into any agreement provision that is prohibited by this section.
(5) It is a violation of this section for an employer to attempt to enforce a provision of an agreement prohibited by this section, whether through a lawsuit, a threat to enforce, or any other attempt to influence a party to comply with a provision in any agreement that is prohibited by this section.
(6) This section does not prohibit an employer and an employee from protecting trade secrets, proprietary information, or confidential information that does not involve illegal acts.
(7) An employer who violates this section after June 9, 2022, is liable in a civil cause of action for actual or statutory damages of $10,000, whichever is more, as well as reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.
(8) For the purposes of this section, "employee" means a current, former, or prospective employee or independent contractor.
(9) A nondisclosure or nondisparagement provision in any agreement signed by an employee who is a Washington resident is governed by Washington law.
(10) The provisions of this section are to be liberally construed to fulfill its remedial purpose.
(11) As an exercise of the state's police powers and for remedial purposes, this section is retroactive from June 9, 2022, only to invalidate nondisclosure or nondisparagement provisions in agreements created before June 9, 2022, and which were agreed to at the outset of employment or during the course of employment. This subsection allows the recovery of damages only to prevent the enforcement of those provisions. This subsection does not apply to a nondisclosure or nondisparagement provision contained in an agreement to settle a legal claim.
Click to expand...
RCW 49.12.250

Employee inspection of personnel file​

(1) For any employer other than those specified under subsection (2) of this section:
(a) The employer shall provide a copy of personnel file(s) within 21 calendar days after the employee, former employee, or their designee requests the file(s) at no cost to the employee, former employee, or their designee.
(b) The employer shall, within 21 calendar days of receiving a written request from a former employee or their designee, furnish a signed written statement to the former employee or their designee stating the effective date of discharge, whether the employer had a reason for the discharge, and if so, the reasons.
(2) Any employer subject to the requirements under chapter 42.56 RCW shall provide a copy of personnel file(s) when requested by the employee, former employee, or their designee in accordance with the procedures and requirements set forth in chapter 42.56 RCW. This subsection (2) does not limit or modify disclosure requirements under chapter 42.56 RCW.
(3)(a) An employee annually may petition that the employer under subsection (1) or (2) of this section review all information in the employee's personnel file(s) that are regularly maintained by the employer as a part of the employer's business records or are subject to reference for information given to persons outside of the company. The employer shall determine if there is any irrelevant or erroneous information in the file(s), and shall remove all such information from the file(s). If an employee does not agree with the employer's determination, the employee may at the employee's request have placed in the employee's personnel file a statement containing the employee's rebuttal or correction. Nothing in this subsection prevents the employer from removing information more frequently.
(b) A former employee shall retain the right of rebuttal or correction for a period not to exceed two years.
(4) For the purposes of this section, "former employee" means a person who separated from the employer within three years of the date of the person's request.
Click to expand...
 
 
The Doom Slayer said:
Remember this the next time 343 and its fans virtue signal about how moral and ethical they are:

View attachment 8805000
View attachment 8805007
View attachment 8805006
Click to expand...
I miss Halo. It is sad what has happened to it. The games and books were fun growing up. Still are. But holy shit, 343, or whatever they're calling themselves, are just corpo raiders. Any spirit there once was is gone. They don't treat their people well, and as far as I can tell, the books are carrying the franchise at this point.
 
WelperHelper99 said:
I miss Halo. It is sad what has happened to it. The games and books were fun growing up. Still are. But holy shit, 343, or whatever they're calling themselves, are just corpo raiders. Any spirit there once was is gone. They don't treat their people well, and as far as I can tell, the books are carrying the franchise at this point.
Click to expand...
Master Chief woke up from his cryopod on a planet full of hot babes and everything after 3 is alternate timeline fan fiction from some ABDL pant shitter's deviant art journal in my mind.

I'm still mad about Marty.
 
NeonFlux said:
Master Chief woke up from his cryopod on a planet full of hot babes and everything after 3 is alternate timeline fan fiction from some ABDL pant shitter's deviant art journal in my mind.
Click to expand...
I enjoyed parts of the story. 4 tried. The books certainly tried to make it work.

But it doesn't work when every game hits like a nuke and wipes out all progress before. They never picked a lane. The books can only do so much, games take priority in Canon

And let's not get started on the show. Could have adapted the first 4 books, but NO, let's make it Hollywood! Fuck them all.
 
I thought this was interesting until I saw his name was Glenn Israel. I don't believe half the shit he wrote because he's also one of this poz loaded 343 faggots that helped add all the gay shit to halo. Looks like he was one of the people MS brought into Bungie.

I bet 343/Halo studio is a terrible place to work. But this is shitlib politics and I'm glad any one working on Halo post Reach got fired.
 
Does any actual work happen at 343i/Halo Studios? Everyone except maybe one or two people simply talk, stop talking, scatter their papers on the table and keep their head down until they're chosen for the latest round of career sacrifices.
 
The Doom Slayer said:
343 and its fans
Click to expand...
Do those people even exist? If they do than they're certainly not old enough to post here.

Regardless I'm not surprised that a company that is a consistent public failure is internally swamped with bullshit. What I'll never understand is what made Microsoft hate Halo so much that they would let this brand get ravaged by greed and incompetence.
 
Kofi Drinka said:
I thought this was interesting until I saw his name was Glenn Israel. I don't believe half the shit he wrote because he's also one of this poz loaded 343 faggots that helped add all the gay shit to halo. Looks like he was one of the people MS brought into Bungie.

I bet 343/Halo studio is a terrible place to work. But this is shitlib politics and I'm glad any one working on Halo post Reach got fired.
Click to expand...
The way he phrases it is obviously part of a legal complaint. I mean what former employee is citing specific legal statutes their former company allegedly violated unless they were advised to do so by their attorney at part of ongoing legal action. Most likely Microsoft will settle with him out of court to make the problem go away assuming he has anything close to a case against them (I’m sure him going public also increases the chances of a settlement since Microsoft will want to clear up their PR as quickly as possible).
 
Last edited:
Kofi Drinka said:
I thought this was interesting until I saw his name was Glenn Israel. I don't believe half the shit he wrote because he's also one of this poz loaded 343 faggots that helped add all the gay shit to halo. Looks like he was one of the people MS brought into Bungie.

I bet 343/Halo studio is a terrible place to work. But this is shitlib politics and I'm glad any one working on Halo post Reach got fired.
Click to expand...
The ouroboros of progress
 
Seafarer said:
The way he phrases it is obviously part of a legal complaint. I mean what former employee is citing specific legal statutes their former company allegedly violated unless they were advised to do so by their attorney at part of ongoing legal action. Most likely Microsoft will settle with him out of court to make the problem go away assuming he has anything close to a case against them.
Click to expand...
Probably gets settled to avoid having their internal files exposed. Imagine how much damage you could do to 343 if you got 10 years of internal communications published into the public record.
 
The Doom Slayer said:
Remember this the next time 343 and its fans virtue signal about how moral and ethical they are:

View attachment 8805000
View attachment 8805007
View attachment 8805006
Click to expand...
This reads kind of like the office crazy person after the inevitable happens. I'm not saying 343 is not a horrible place to work. But this reads like a Russel Greer lawsuit. Lots of outrage. No specifics. I suspect the major source of offense and harassment is the order came down from Mickeysoft to stop with all the fucking LGabTQ shit as it was tanking the product sales. And this triggered Mr Israel to become an employee activist asshole.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom