Guns good or bad

[HG 400]

There's no such thing as an "Assault Weapon".

lol ok dude

https://www.usatoday.com/story/life...l-crow-assault-weapon-ban-pro-life/731337001/

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...ter-accessories-bump-stocks-article-1.3543115

http://www.trentonian.com/article/TT/20171005/NEWS/171009874

There are hundreds more results just from search 'assault weapons' but it's pretty obvious they're a thing. Assault weapons are clearly guns that fit too many shells in the clip to have any reasonable use except shooting up schools.

 

[Gym Leader Elesa]

There's this strange phenomenon, and don't think I'm crazy when I say this, but there are a group of people called "criminals" and they often do things called "crimes."

Damn, there are a lot of synonyms for niggers aren't there?

 

[WW 635]

Assault weapons are clearly guns that fit too many shells in the clip to have any reasonable use except shooting up schools.

Or a 16 hour firefight on Haifa Street in Baghdad

 

[ArnoldPalmer]

There are hundreds more results just from search 'assault weapons' but it's pretty obvious they're a thing. Assault weapons are clearly guns that fit too many shells in the clip to have any reasonable use except shooting up schools.

Remember when I said it's a purely subjective term used only politically? Thanks for the validation.

i don't give nearly enough of a shit about guns to discuss the rest of the novel you've written for yourself here but language is inherently subjective my dude

Not when it comes to legislation. Half the battle of gun control is in the language.

 

[HG 400]

Remember when I said it's a purely subjective term used only politically? Thanks for the validation.

"15 shells in the clip is too many" is not subjective.

 

[AnOminous]

"15 shells in the clip is too many" is not subjective.

What if you need to shoot up a school, though?

 

[ArnoldPalmer]

Yes it is, and it's magazines. You clearly don't have any experience with this thing you have such strong opinions about.

 

[sunreaver]

Not when it comes to legislation.

actually i think you'll find that it is considering we have courts, not executioners

 

[HG 400]

Yes it is, and it's magazines. You clearly don't have any experience with this thing you have such strong opinions about.

You don't need 15-shell drum clips for hunting, dude.

 

[ArnoldPalmer]

You don't need 15-shell drum clips for hunting, dude.

I do for target shooting, and I'm very glad you're not in control of my hobbies. Besides that, it doesn't matter why I "need" a 25rd magazine. I'm not surrendering my right to have that, because I may one day need to use it against my government.

 

[WW 635]

What if you need to shoot up a school, though?

Because you need to take it back from ISIS?

 

[AnOminous]

Because you need to take it back from ISIS?

Schools suck and they're totally gay. Suppose you just want to exercise your rights by shooting up one?

 

[DeadwastePrime]

guns dont kill people. the bullets in the guns that people shoot do. therefore, we should ban bullets and people from holding guns. that'll work

 

[Feline Darkmage]

Confiscate all guns, sell them to other countries, use the proceeds for federal martial arts classes.

Imagine the headlines: "59 Dead, 500 Injured from Mass Roundhouse Kicking in Las Vegas"

Chuck Norris must be stopped!

 

[HG 400]

because I may one day need to use it against my government.

So essentially the only valid reason you own guns is because you might want to become a terrorist someday?

 

[ArnoldPalmer]

Found the non-American. If defending my life against an inevitable tyranny is terrorism, then a warm, welcoming allahu ackbar to you, my friend.

2A exists for that express purpose, try not to be so dense. The ability to hunt and collect them is honestly secondary to the idea that I am responsible for defending my home from invaders, and my local area from a runaway government.

 

[HG 400]

If defending my life against an inevitable tyranny is terrorism, then allahu ackbar.

2A exists for that exact reason, try not to be so dense.

That was before the government had tanks and stealth planes and nuclear bombs. It's not like a bunch of flyover-state rednecks are gonna be able to overthrow 'tyrants' with ur dinky little .48 magnums with only 15 shells in the clip.

The only possible scenario where you're going to be using assault weapons against your government is by becoming a terrorist and shooting up schools.

 

[ArnoldPalmer]

Again, proof that you know absolutely nothing of what you speak.

 

[HG 400]

I "need" a 25rd magazine.

You spelled "25th" wrong, btw.

 

[ArnoldPalmer]

At this point I can't tell if you're low-T trolling, or just dumb.