Gun Control

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
So now that the Supreme Court has finished dabbing on May Issue, and is activelly fucking salt weepeen bands, how are ya feelin?
 
MT Foxtrot said:
The police are under ZERO obligation to protect anyone other than prison inmates (Warren vs DC, look it up). They don't even have to enforce a restraining order (Castlerock vs Gonzales) .

You are on your own when it comes to your self defense. Those cases are why I continue to support gun ownership by law abiding citizens.
Click to expand...
That's true, but it really shouldn't be. The police are fucking worthless if they don't "protect and serve".
 
Time to bump this thread to mention governor Newson latest twist about gun control from that article.
www.thegatewaypundit.com

IT BEGINS: California Planning Gun "Microstamp" Database

The left is going all out on their anti-gun agenda. California is now planning a gun “microstamp” database. Just The News reported: Attorney General Rob Bonta, along with the California Department of Justice, is proposing an additional rule to bolster the use of microstamping. The new rule...
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com
The left is going all out on their anti-gun agenda.

California is now planning a gun “microstamp” database.

Just The News reported:

Attorney General Rob Bonta, along with the California Department of Justice, is proposing an additional rule to bolster the use of microstamping. The new rule proposes that the unique microstamp of every handgun in California be kept as a record with the Department of Justice to identify firearms used in criminal activity.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
I can hear the criminals laughing at this in El Risitas style.
 
Foulmouth said:
Over here guns are pretty fairly controlled and hard to get which I think is a good thing but crime and mad shit is up which leaves me considering getting one .
Because of our strict gun laws I'd have to buy it illegally which is a fuckin' conundrum right there.
I guess I figure if a high proportion of scum are armed then I too wish to be .
Click to expand...
Funny how that works
 
The guys of American Thinker posted a interesting rant about the NY Times staff flip-flopping on gun control.
February 14, 2023

It's finally dawning on the New York Times that gun-free zones don't work​

By D. Parker

Even the media can't ignore the cold, hard reality that depriving people of their commonsense civil rights doesn't protect them.
If you look closely enough, the media are making some stunning admissions. A recent New York Times article all but conceded that "gun-free zones" don't work. A newspaper in Raleigh, North Carolina asked a question that destroyed this central tenet of gun control.
The piece in the New York Times detailed the creation of a gun-free zone in Times Square, accompanied by an increased police presence and the requisite "gun-free zone" signs.
While the increased police presence helped reduce crime, it continued. The signs did nothing to stop criminals from carrying guns, and shootings continued:
"People feel emboldened to carry guns on the street," said Tom Harris, a retired New York police inspector and the president of the Times Square Alliance, which promotes businesses and coordinates major events.
"A gun-free zone is not going to stop a criminal from carrying a gun," Mr. Harris said.
Anyone with a logical mind could have made the point that a "gun-free zone" only deprives the innocent of their means of self-defense, giving criminals and the government free rein.
Except that the far left tends not to distinguish between innocent people and criminals. Leftists tend to lump them together and look at aggregate statistics on guns, with the simplistic notion that more guns equals more death and fewer guns equals fewer deaths without any thought on who has them.
Those who put some intellectual effort into understanding this issue realize that there is a vast difference between innocent people and criminals being armed. But that would require a thoughtful instead of an emotional assessment of the situation. Doing that destroys any reasons for gun control.
Click to expand...
 
All other arguments aside, I detest the idea that something should be taken from me due to misuse of that something by others.

I don't give a rat's ass what DeQueerius Al Durkadurka does, I'm a responsible firearm owner and should not be punished for his actions.
 
PlugsPugs said:
All other arguments aside, I detest the idea that something should be taken from me due to misuse of that something by others.

I don't give a rat's ass what DeQueerius Al Durkadurka does, I'm a responsible firearm owner and should not be punished for his actions.
Click to expand...
Really there are no arguments to be had because we all know what their ultimate goal is regardless of what they claim. So my answer is one word and it is a full sentence. "No."

"Do you support gun control?"
"No."
"But what about-"
"No."
"How many kids have to-"
"No."
 
I'm here to present a final solution to the gun control question. Neocons misrepresenting this issue to give Neolibs more arguments pisses me off. I will list every argument I know.
  1. Niggers commit 50% of violent crimes and about 70-80% of mass shootings despite being 13% of the population. Gun crime is a distinctly black issue.
  2. Shootings were uncommon before the 1970s, even amongst niggers, despite gun ownership being a constitutional right.
  3. Automatic weapons were invented before the American Revolution, and many warships were privately owned (and hired by the U.S. Military) and used these automatic weapons (see puckle gun).
  4. The purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to protect citizens from each other and the government (notice how it never mentions hunting).
  5. The Wild West was the safest period in American history crime-wise, do not mention it as a bad period, it was a euphoric time.
  6. Automatic weapon ownership has a negligible impact on gun crime and gun deaths, most shootings are by niggers with handguns.
  7. Many European countries have/had gun rights for their citizens (see Czechia, Switzerland) and yet have few shootings, could this have something to do with their culture?
  8. The Australian gun buyback coincided exactly with a decrease in gun deaths which had started years prior.
  9. British people have gun ownership, no you did not ban all gun ownership, shut up and brush your teeth you disgusting Anglo wigger.
  10. Britain has greater knife crime and acid throwing than anywhere in the USA.
  11. Cities in the USA with the strictest gun laws have the highest gun deaths. Do you know why? Criminals do not follow laws. No, gun-free zones do not work. If they did, shootings wouldn't happen. Putting up a sign doesn't vaporize firearms that enter the area, it emboldens thieves and criminals.
  12. Yes, states run by Republicans have high gun crime, but cities in those states are run by democrats. Florida has high gun crime, do you know why? MIAMI IS DEEP BLUE.
  13. Communist nations always take guns away from gun owners. American gun control was born when the KKK impersonated police officers to take guns from law-abiding niggers, then they lynched them. This same tactic was used against law-abiding people who didn't like communism in: Russia, China, Cuba, Korea, Vietnam, East Germany, Poland, Slovakia, Czechia, Moldova, Yugoslavia, and many more.
  14. Cops are the ones you entrust to take guns, correct? But I thought ACAB (all cops are bastards) and muh George Floyd? You entrust your personal safety exclusively to fascist murderers?
  15. Japan has little gun ownership, yes, but do you know why they have no murders/mass shootings? THEY HAVE NO NIGGERS (see argument #1).
Please inform me of any further arguments to add.
 
Last edited:
Black Man Underwear said:
Please inform me of any further arguments to add.
Click to expand...
Here's one, and the only one you need: No. Go to Copenseethen and dilate. It's a right, it won't be infringed, and the past decade of fuckery has made it so I have nothing to lose. Literally come and take them if you want them so goddamn badly. I'm actually itching to kill tyrants at this point, I just need you to knock on my door.
 
I bump this thread to mention then Chuck Schmer, that old fart still push for gun control.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is pursuing more gun control after shootings rocked Democrat-run cities over the Fourth of July weekend.
The Hill reported weekend shootings in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Baltimore, Maryland; Lansing, Michigan; and Wichita, Kansas. All four cities are Democrat-run.
Breitbart News also noted at least 32 people were shot Friday into Monday morning in Democrat Mayor Brandon Johnson’s Chicago. Three of the shooting victims succumbed to their wounds.
President Joe Biden responded to the gun control by calling for his normal litany of gun control laws: an “assault weapons” ban, a “high capacity” magazine ban, universal background checks, the ability to sue gun makers over gun crime, and more.
Click to expand...

Memo to Chuck; show the example by dropping your armed bodyguards and don't live in a gated community or apartment tower. Btw, I hope you don't practice gun smuggling like your buddy ex-senator Leyland Yee.
 
The rich fucks and politicians with gated communities and armed personal security shouldn't even have the right to call for gun control.
 
SSj_Ness said:
The rich fucks and politicians with gated communities and armed personal security shouldn't even have the right to call for gun control.
Click to expand...
+1, I agree. That quote would be a source of inspiration for a meme featuring Willy Wonka or the Third World Skeptical kid like "Gun control activists are anti-gun but why they need armed personal security and live in gated communities?
 
Lemme illustrate.

Ten people are in a room having a discussion. Nine are libtards, and every time they speak, the one non-libtard in the room harshly shuts them down, jeers at them, and tells them exactly how retarded they sound.

Finally, one of the libtards stands up and demands the one person either shut up or leave.

Then that one pulls a gun and says "make me."

It's funny, that mental image. If the libtards themselves were armed, the one remainder might be forced to actually be less of an asshole.

This was even acknowledged in the 1930s, I recall a Robert E. Howard Conan story that claimed barbarian leaders were usually more polite than civilized ones, because in civilization you know you can be an asshole without your head immediately being separated from your shoulders.

Forget "control," I think gun ownership should be mandatory. Just everyone gets a gun, the tall and the small. This is how the world was for thousands of years, and funny how humanity has been advancing for thousands of years and its only when we started banning weapons that we stopped advancing and in fact started backsliding.

Under mandatory ownership, most of the lesser members of society would be knocked off before they had a chance to be a problem. Everyone left would be either highly skilled or highly intellectual. But of course every society on Earth is too wussy to try this.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm off to take my meds.
 
skykiii said:
Forget "control," I think gun ownership should be mandatory. Just everyone gets a gun, the tall and the small. This is how the world was for thousands of years, and funny how humanity has been advancing for thousands of years and its only when we started banning weapons that we stopped advancing and in fact started backsliding.

Under mandatory ownership, most of the lesser members of society would be knocked off before they had a chance to be a problem. Everyone left would be either highly skilled or highly intellectual. But of course every society on Earth is too wussy to try this.
Click to expand...

I have had conversations with progressives who use all the standard "who needs a gun?" and various talking points.

Privately they have told me, "I would never have a gun in the house because I am afraid of what would happen if I had another depressive episode."

When you say "lesser members of society would be knocked off" I think a lot of that would be suicide.
 
As others have said, it's time to bump this thread to generate some critical thinking and thoughtful discussion. I don't know if the most hard-line pro-2A argument has been posted yet, but I'll put it here anyway because it deserves to be posted.

My take on gun control is this: not an inch. Not one, whether it be today, or tomorrow, or in our lifetimes, nor when we all are dead and gone. Not when the Farms are lost to history, nor when civilization inevitably collapses.

As a gun owner, I keep an AR-15 for home defense and I conceal carry a 9mm pistol daily. I like to think of myself as a peaceful man, but the truth is, if I'm put into a position where I have to choose between myself or a thug, then I choose to take out the thug. That's just how it is. If you have a problem with it, then that's too bad. Fuck around and find out, you know?

A lot of people like to parrot this "weapons of war" talking point whenever firearms like the AR-15 are brought up or used in a crime, sometimes heinous crimes. My counter is this: yes, the AR-15 is a weapon of war. The reason we need that weapon of war is to protect ourselves against tyrannical entities that would seek to wage war upon us, whether that entity be foreign or domestic. The Founding Father's wanted us to have weapons of war for that very reason.

I do feel it's necessary to disclose that my life was saved by having a gun, before.

There's no way in which you can persuade me that we need gun control, or that we need to ban "weapons of war," or that guns don't save lives. I've seen the DGU statistics in the US which outnumber violent crimes. You know the biggest reason you can't persuade me? That reason is the tens of millions of Jews, Kulaks, Chinese farmers, Cambodians and Ukrainians that were the victims of genocide in the 20th century, as well as the victims of the extirpation of Native peoples of the Americas, the Spanish Inquisition, the enslaving of Africans...

You can make up whatever excuse you want, but at the end of the day, it is my birthright to own and carry firearms for whatever reason I damn so wish, because the alternative is way scarier. In fact, I believe that right extends to all weapons/"arms", not just firearms.
 
skykiii said:
Forget "control," I think gun ownership should be mandatory. Just everyone gets a gun, the tall and the small.
Click to expand...
I have a better idea, strengthen self-defense rights and outlaw anyone but whites from having guns.

Yours is more realistic though, so good enough.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom