GamerGate - Autistic MRA manchildren and the twitter feminists who love them

  • Thread starter Thread starter HG 400
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Oh yeah, as soon as GG got outside 4chan the MRA's and MGTOWs and Redpillers and Shitstirrers all wanted a piece of the action. You had the people wanting to be the e-celebs, the people wanting to be one of the power brokers, especially when board ownership was up for grabs at 8chan. Youd could almost see how it turned into another Occupy. It drove alot of people out, the inter-group drama became too much. People thinking PR was still valuable after seeing the media just wanted to protect their Gaming Industry clients and publishers.

The only thing I think maybe they did was to bring the SJW into the wider conciousness of the conservative news sites, which were the only ones willing to pick up the story.
The MRAs and Redpillers were right there when it started. I remember how they humiliated XSEED and forced them to issue an apology during the Senran Kagura SJW shitshow. I knew GG was doomed from day one just from that one event. Also from the fact that Zoe Quinn set them off, a girl who got 5 guys laid.
 
Gamergate was dumb garbage from the start. Gaming "media" has been garbage since day one and has always been rife with nepotism, payola, etc. As far as I can see, the only reason salty internet spergs got salty this time is because A FEMALE benefited from it this time and also some gaming "journalists" got laid.

This, of course, does not absolve or justify the more hysterical elements of anti-GG.
 
Gamergate was dumb garbage from the start. Gaming "media" has been garbage since day one and has always been rife with nepotism, payola, etc. As far as I can see, the only reason salty internet spergs got salty this time is because A FEMALE benefited from it this time and also some gaming "journalists" got laid.

This, of course, does not absolve or justify the more hysterical elements of anti-GG.
This. It was no coincidence that someone who fit every single stereotype they had against the SJW (danger hair, tattoos, piercings, female, etc) set it off despite the time it's been known that they only care for each other.
 
I notice that a lot of these guys like to call themselves "philosophers". It's one of those terms where you don't actually have to do anything to earn the title.

"I think, therefore I'm a philosopher."

What a great accomplishment!
Anyone capable of thought doesn't give two cents about GG.

Real philosophers would kick these lolcows' butts so hard they fly into the ionosphere.
 
GG was basically taken over by /pol/ before it even started and then its opponents successfully compared it to neo-Nazis because of that.

GG was /pol/ and /v/ working together. /pol/ did the initial digging on Chelsea, /pol/ suggested the TFYC money raiser. I saw it. I was there. I saw it all.


You see these boards are populated by young men, many of them were raised thinking that most people were essentially good upstanding folk, with a few bad apples in the bunch, I don't think any of them realized the extent of the cronyism and corruption that surrounded not only the videogames industry, but pretty much any industry or group. The fact they thought PR would work, that the games media would be unbiased towards them, that the games media would not end up covering for themselves, their advertisers, their sites, that their friends in mainstream media wouldn't use it as the next games scare in order to get cheap views.

Combine that with the autistic types that tend to browse imageboards, the MRA and Nazi types in /pol/, all getting angry that not only the world isn't fair, but it's out to get you if you rock the boat, was the perfect lolcow storm.
 
GG was /pol/ and /v/ working together. /pol/ did the initial digging on Chelsea, /pol/ suggested the TFYC money raiser. I saw it. I was there. I saw it all.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=IEuB3bAgdjY
You see these boards are populated by young men, many of them were raised thinking that most people were essentially good upstanding folk, with a few bad apples in the bunch, I don't think any of them realized the extent of the cronyism and corruption that surrounded not only the videogames industry, but pretty much any industry or group. The fact they thought PR would work, that the games media would be unbiased towards them, that the games media would not end up covering for themselves, their advertisers, their sites, that their friends in mainstream media wouldn't use it as the next games scare in order to get cheap views.

Combine that with the autistic types that tend to browse imageboards, the MRA and Nazi types in /pol/, all getting angry that not only the world isn't fair, but it's out to get you if you rock the boat, was the perfect lolcow storm.
GG was /pol/ working within /v/. The only thing that it had to do with /v/ was that video games were the trigger. But the fact that it was dragged into a war against the SJW from the get go instead of video game journalism (or attacks against the common enemy, Kotaku even though Polygon was the worst offender), and the constant rehashing of the Le Happy Merchant and other /pol/ memes showed that they were running the show.
 
If that's the case, it probably explains why Mr. Metokur was giving /pol/ a handjob when he pulled the plug on his Internet Aristocrat channel. The man vastly overestimated the number of people he thought would join /pol/ when they hopped aboard the GG bandwagon and when he failed to sway them completely on his side, he had a hissy fit and quit the internet for a couple of weeks.
 
Oh yeah, as soon as GG got outside 4chan the MRA's and MGTOWs and Redpillers and Shitstirrers all wanted a piece of the action. You had the people wanting to be the e-celebs, the people wanting to be one of the power brokers, especially when board ownership was up for grabs at 8chan. Youd could almost see how it turned into another Occupy. It drove alot of people out, the inter-group drama became too much. People thinking PR was still valuable after seeing the media just wanted to protect their Gaming Industry clients and publishers.

The only thing I think maybe they did was to bring the SJW into the wider conciousness of the conservative news sites, which were the only ones willing to pick up the story.
For pro-GG individuals like @Jaimas you had more pro-GG speds like Homer using Twitter to signal the same thing over and over like a dead horse. As with inter-group drama, you had those that just want ethics but then things like InternetAristocrat wanting it to be a kick in the nuts exposure of SJW's derails that. As for bringing SJW's into wider consciousness, there's already some universities showcasing their idiocy that Fox News could pick up. If anything, all GG did was get Brianna Wu onto television and having a Law & Order episode involving gamer terrorist.

Gamergate was dumb garbage from the start. Gaming "media" has been garbage since day one and has always been rife with nepotism, payola, etc. As far as I can see, the only reason salty internet spergs got salty this time is because A FEMALE benefited from it this time and also some gaming "journalists" got laid.

This, of course, does not absolve or justify the more hysterical elements of anti-GG.
Between salty at a woman benefitting from this and optimistic individuals thinking the journalism scene wasn't all that corrupt, they did at least bring some good idiots to laugh at, not just from the anti side but from their own side as well. Anyone remembering Lord Balderdash could remember whatever GG sperging he did such as thinking SJW's will kill us all.
 
gamergate are terrorists we have proof.png

https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAc...ma_ggrevolt_doxxed_otter_jesus_and_attempted/

tl;dr some GG autist threatened to shoot some Magic The Gathering and 40k players and got the cops called on him, is constantly whining "it's not a threat it's shitposting bro" on reddit, or someone is actually white-knighting him.
 
View attachment 97734
https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAc...ma_ggrevolt_doxxed_otter_jesus_and_attempted/

tl;dr some GG autist threatened to shoot some Magic The Gathering and 40k players and got the cops called on him, is constantly whining "it's not a threat it's shitposting bro" on reddit, or someone is actually white-knighting him.
Any attempt at shitposting was already drowned out by autism and even then, the shitpost claim is on par with one claiming to be trolling in that it acts as a way of one trying to deflect the fact they're being an idiot.

yeah, that guy.

View attachment 97735

>literal language police
Even if it's shitposting, not everyone is familiar with the term and even then, burden of proof is on him because not many are convinced it was just a shitpost.
 
Making terrorist threats is never shitposting, fam. It's a felony.
Correct. There's nothing to indicate it's just a shitpost. A casual observer would interpret that as a legitimate threat. You can't use "I was only kidding" as a defense when by all appearances it looks like you weren't.
 
I'd love to see that argument play out in this court.

Judge: So you emailed the plaintiff 12 times then threatened to, and I quote 'Track down' the defendant, 'beat her with a baseball bat until' she 'shat blood' and then that you would proceed to 'rape her with the bat until she bled to death from the splinters'. What do you have to say in your defense?
Edgelord: Well, you see sir, there is this thing online commonly known as 'shitposting'...
 
I think it falls under shitposting. It was stupid and not only added nothing, it took away. What he doesn't understand is that shitposting in any context is almost never excusable. There is the exception of joking around, but this sure as fuck isn't joking around.
 
Arguably OT but the (somewhat unclear, SCOTUS avoids setting precedents unless they abdolutely have to to resolve a case) standard for determining whether a statement like this is a true threat, is whether the speaker knew that what they said would scare or intimidate people. (Or, reasonably should have known.) That same standard got a guy in jail for an "artistic" (or whatever the fuck he called it) bomb threat posted online to "see how people would react", even though he had no actual intention of carrying it out and said so through public fora shortly thereafter. He demonstrated that he knew it would provoke fear in people.

So a prosecutor would just have to prove that this moron knew what he was saying could actually scare people, which wouldn't be an uphill battle.

If you're going to shitpost, say nonsense like "Kiwis are all awful people. You better stay away from your local retard bashing website, because I'm planning to shoot up the one near me soon." Or the always-classic "Dynastia will fite you irl."
 
Back
Top Bottom