GamerGate Events and Discussion

  • 🔎 If you see an alert for analytics.usips.org, this is a self-hosted system I am running as a test. It is GDPR compliant and collects no invasive information.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
:story: What an edgelord. At least he had the decency to choose a fitting Twitter icon.

He's not kidding. There was a barrage of FIGHT ME IRLs. That's pretty impressive.

Anyway.


In the "It's a Small Internet" file. Remember this faggot from about a page ago?

CA523g7XIAAnil5.png


I did a bit of digging and quickly learned that Ben Parfitt is the same asshole behind dismissing people pissed about Mass Effect 3's ending as "entitled" and calling them "whiners" to deflect legitimate criticism. Said anus-head is also the same moron who dismissed criticisms of DMC: Devil May Cry's general edginess, atrocious dialogue and the fact that it was nothing like other games in the series as "Devil May Cry fans destroying the brand out of spite."

However, he goes on to out himself as a fucking moron by once again starting shit with TotalBiscuit (that ended so well for Moviebob), and bringing into the fray a champion of the farms:

QjQMcV1.png

#JESUISSTRYKER

Oh, and he has a Tumblr, too. One which would not go amiss on The Ballpit, in which he yells about how he hates Dark Souls for being a game people like that demands skill to be good at, and wherein he bitches about TotalBiscuit being better than he is.

But the piece de la resistance is this lovely banner by /v/:

0OTM3hT.png
 
I checked the petition (archived) and to be fair there does seem to be a bit of unwarranted entitlement.


Of course, there are also people who bring up good points.

But it's typical of the media to focus on the negative and ignore the positive. *sigh*

Agreed. After all we're supposed to "listen and believe" and not look into things any further. Why?
LISTEN AND BELIEVE!!!1!!​

Except the last two times they put their games on PC, the communities died literally within two or three months because they couldn't be arsed to properly protect their game from a simple cheating program. All resulting as soon as someone got the port data for it, enter the cacophony of edgelord cheaters running around dropping nonexistent items, crashing people's games and corrupting tens of hundreds of hours of data, all of which STILL hasn't been fixed in both cases to this day.

I'll take an outbreak of easily detectable and bannable modsaves over unkillable demigods that can break the principals of time and gravity at will or Father Christmas any day.

From can't optimize PC ports for shit because they've practically never done it before outside of very distant King's Field ports; nor can the PC crowd be trusted to be responsible with the game when the frame rate and graphics aren't at proper jerking off rate for them to siddle their fatrolls over.

All that being said, the petition crap is getting out of hand these days. It's a wonder anyone actually takes them seriously anymore.
 
Last edited:
Arthur Chu is really starting to go into lolcow territory.

CA-onMPUYAAGkLm.png:large

I think we need to archive this, so whenever we see anyone on the Internet bemoaning women claiming they're not feminists, we can post the image and say THIS is why they came to that opinion
 
....Thirty thousand needed to figure out why we call people faggots?

Christ, that was money well-spent. Maybe for a follow-up they could spend $50,000 on researching why Dynastia was apparently sexy enough to drag the Golden Knight into a deviant lifestyle.

Or they could spend $2 million on finding out why I like to quote Morrissey/Smiths songs (The More That You Pay Me, The Faster I'll Tell! ;) )
 
I wonder if he's even aware of the hypocrisy of his statements. I am kinda curious to know what set this tweedledum off though, if only so I can give them a cookie for the laughs.

People like Mr Stanton are why people like the SNP are doing so well. Very angry people who aren't thinking straight.

Also, Glasgow, so I'm guessing he'll be strung out on heroin and Special Brew.
 
I will give him this, he is right that if people didn't give the Tropes Vs. Women series so much attention and hate at its conception it never would have gotten big.

Funny how he can recognize that the Streisand Effect helped make Anita prominent, but doesn't acknolwedge that the very same sort of reactions brought GamerGate to life.

Ben Parfitt
But the piece de la resistance is this lovely banner by /v/:

Confirms what I've been noticing lately - the only thing these folks are actually "liberal" about is their use of censorship.

apparently there was a near-30k grant given to a group to study 'the toxic speech of gaming'. Why is this ride constantly getting crazier?

Doesn't seem any crazier than any of the other grants given out for social research.

But their title, “Notoriously Toxic: Understanding the Language and Costs of Hate and Harassment in Online Games”, makes me suspect they've already come to a conclusion, not just a hypothesis, and their research is going to be slanted towards trying to prove it.
 
Confirms what I've been noticing lately - the only thing these folks are actually "liberal" about is their use of censorship.

Amen to that.

Time for the news blast.


* So speaking of assholes, let's check in on Ian Miles "Hitler Was Great" Cheong. Those who've been following Gamergate since the outset will recognize that Cheong was quick to duck below the radar and then not resurface, perhaps engaging his own autistic version of stealth mode. As it turns out, right before he went radio silent, he had promised to do an interview of Matthew Mitchum (of AesopGames fame) on Gameranx. The interview allegedly happened, but then Cheong never posted it. The reason Cheong never posted it? Because Mitchum is pretty openly Pro-GG and was since the get-go. You can read the whole thing here. Likewise, links to the conversations that led to Mitchum making these public are here and here.


* Leigh Alexander has begun a steady slide into irrelevance. Since she's been refusing to cover anything GG related, or, apparently, relevant to her job as a reviewer, she's entered something of a decaying orbit, which, paired with how bad Kotaku's doing, has made me smile. She also takes a shot at TotalBiscuit here, which is hilarious to watch - she essentially goes on a tirade about how HE DOESN'T HAVE THE RESPECT OF CRITICAL INSTITUTIONS AND INDIE DEVS, to which the indifferent masses went "Yes, Leigh, and nobody fucking cares." How was it you originally so eloquently put it, Leigh? Oh, honey.


* Birds Fly, Sun Shines, Grass Grows, and Margaret Pless shits another article on DailyKos that is currently struggling to reach double-digit likes. In this one, she prattles on about what an awful, awful man Hotwheels is and how his new-fangled Eight Chan site is ruining the lives of many a feminist - but she doesn't stop there. She accuses him of pedophilia tolerance (because of the infamous Dan Olson Incident and the fact that he doesn't give a shit if 8chan's /b/tards post loli or shit), claims he's pro eugenics (You know, because that's a thing apparently), and she tries to extensively tie him to /baph/ and the likes of the GNAA. Clearly, she does not know how chans work and isn't aware of what happened the last time some SJW tried to start shit against a *chan.


* This one's big. No, scratch that. If this is true, it's fucking earth-shattering. Have you ever wondered why it was that the mainstream press threw everything behind the likes of FemFreq during Gamergate's outset? Well, read this and wonder no longer. The TL;DR is that a massive media group based in London, called United Business Media, has been bankrolling their operations - either openly, or behind-the-scenes - and placing their hands firmly on the likes of the IGDA, Gamasutra, and even the GDC. They have huge pull in the industry, and Reaxxion's been the only publication with the balls to even cover this so far. To give some info on it:

Leader of Gamergate said:
Gamasutra, the SJW gaming website formerly edited by Leigh Alexander, is owned by UBM and falls under their “Other Marketing Services” category. Alexander is a vocal opponent of GamerGate and a shameless corporate shill: she actually ranked Kim Kardashian’s cash-grab mobile game as one of her favorite releases of 2014. Alexander also helped kick off the wave of “Gamers Are Dead” articles last August, which inspired the rise of GamerGate.

GamerGate managed to score a victory against Gamasutra by convincing Intel to pull their ads from the site. GamerGate pulled this off by mass emailing Intel, informing them of Alexander’s Tweets endorsing racism, bullying and other social faux pas. Unfortunately, the victory was short-lived, as Intel resumed advertising on Gamasutra not long after.

Why would Intel reverse course so quickly? Some GamerGate supporters assumed it was because Leigh Alexander was blackmailing them. If Alexander had the resources to blackmail Intel, one of the largest corporations in the world, she could have blackmailed UBM into keeping her as Gamasutra’s editor. This FanFiction.net mythologization of Alexander discounts the very real power UBM has.

It’s far more likely that UBM directly pressured Intel to reinstate the ads. Gamasutra is a tiny slice of UBM’s empire; as noted above, 84 percent of the company’s business comes from PR Newswire and Events. Whatever revenue Gamasutra earns is dwarfed by PR Newswire, one of the divisions of UBM that enables them to grab other corporations by the balls.

As a rule, I'm not a fan of theories that sum up "this is why everything bad happened" in a single bullet point, but the above reveals, if true, explain a critical piece of the puzzle we've lacked from the beginning: a compelling financial reason for why so many Games Journos decided, seemingly apropos of nothing, to turn on their own industry and audience. If this Reaxxion's reveal is true - and it looks like it might very well be - and it thusly turns out that a lot of them are openly being paid off by a corporation with a political axe to grind (and it is; UBM is pretty openly socialist, even by the standards of a lefty like me), then this is starting to make a chilling amount of sense.


* As if to drive the above home, Kotaku ran an article on why everyone should want politics in their games.


* We need some fucking levity to end on. Thankfully, Youtube obliges with a dramatic reading of Rich Stanton's meltdown last night on Twitter:
 
Once again Kotaku ducks from the point.

It's not that people don't want politics in games, it's that people don't want their bullshit pseudo-politics in games.

I'm of the mind that any political message can MAKE a game when you have enough of a game actually molded around it. As shitty as it is, however, collective consciousness dictates an uncertain statistic in how many people actually give a fuck about the message you're trying to push through. When we say "Keep your politics out of our video games", we tend to mean "Stop demanding everybody change their games so you won't label them 'problematic'" Or, you know, one of these people actually MAKING a game to suit their beliefs and trying to get it pushed fairly, with that little thing they call 'work'?

Though that's the kicker, you have to make a video game under the idea that it will in some way sell to balance out the cost of its development; Social Justice ain't a real enticing product, at least in the way they seem to see it.
 
....Thirty thousand needed to figure out why we call people faggots?

Christ, that was money well-spent. Maybe for a follow-up they could spend $50,000 on researching why Dynastia was apparently sexy enough to drag the Golden Knight into a deviant lifestyle.
In regards to "toxic speech", because online gaming is like the internet in that we start off with some sort of anonmity? As for Dynastia, because his avatar has a nice beard?

CA_hk1IVIAE8bf1.png


Come say that to me irl and not online faggot.
A 6'2 Glaswegian? So can I assume he also became katana wielding immortal and fought in the SAS? He does embody an internet tough guy vibe with that tweet, kinda like with Homer.
 
I don't really have a horse in this race, but seeing the "Anti" gamergate people threating to assault people is just staggeringly hypocritical given how much they complain about toothless twitter threats
 
So speaking of assholes, let's check in on Ian Miles "Hitler Was Great" Cheong. Those who've been following Gamergate since the outset will recognize that Cheong was quick to duck below the radar and then not resurface, perhaps engaging his own autistic version of stealth mode. As it turns out, right before he went radio silent, he had promised to do an interview of Matthew Mitchum (of AesopGames fame) on Gameranx. The interview allegedly happened, but then Cheong never posted it. The reason Cheong never posted it? Because Mitchum is pretty openly Pro-GG and was since the get-go. You can read the whole thing here. Likewise, links to the conversations that led to Mitchum making these public are here and here.
Interview archived, just to be safe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom