indeed it has, but then what do you expect when the game journalists mass publish "GAMERS R MISGOGYNERD MANBABY" articles for 2 months. hell Gamergate would have died witin a week if journalists behaved like mature adults and did something to allay the concerns being raised while not treating those raising said concerns llike shit
Aren't they supposed to write reviews of video games and stuff instead? I mean it seems kind of dumb to give so much ink to such a dumb personal drama story.
because zoe was in their clique, they defended her with utmost rabid vindictiveness from all criticism. They still havent learned how trying to use their position for their own crusades and vendettas pisses people off
It isn't much of an article, but it's related to an attempt of tactical re-framing. Apparently people should not be called anti- or pro-GG, and Gamergate should not be called a movement, but a consumer revolt and a scandal like Watergate.
They're being angry babies and not reporting on news relevant to developers who support GG.
Probably, for the most part. But it's not a mainstream thing. Like if you asked 100 random people somewhere like NYC what they thought about gamergate, you might only have 2 or 3 people who know what the hell you're talking about, and those would be gamers, SJWs, or people who follow internet drama. I don't think any of my IRL even know about it at all.
Mostly the Anglosphere with some additional non-speaking parts of europe here and there.
plus japan I think.
You know it's funny how much their "ignoring it" resembles Jay's version of the same, with them declaring it dead, then declaring the issue over and then repeatedly complaining about it. Methinks there's a whole lotta lolcow in these idiots.
