- Joined
- Jun 27, 2014
They'd have had a point on that one if it wasn't for the fact that Dragon's Crown, like many Vanillaware games, was specifically intended to take the piss. Yes, there's an obscenely buxom sorceress character you can play as. There's also a mostly-naked man in a loincloth who wrestles enemies to death, a bishie wizard who would moisten the panties of any self-respecting female adventurer, and a fairy that takes breaks by having a nice dip in someone's tankard of booze.Regarding Japanese games, I can only think of Dragon's Crown due to the Sorceress who is a buxom character (enough that A-Log would lust after her). Said character was criticized by a member of Kotaku if I recall. Even then, I'd also wonder if they'd complain about Dragon's Dogma (A game from Capcom) since your armor as a female can be a chainmail bikini, never mind the fact that even guys can have that (Leather belts and bandit stalkers, that is all). I say all this since it could be possible they might complain about female characters being sexualized for their armor.
It's fine to have conversations on character design and what-have-you - those are important, and really, we should have those more often - but to target a game specifically for that design choice, and then treat it like it was some institutionalized attempt at male-dominance nonsense when it was done to mock it kind of reeks of silliness. I remember some time ago there was some big kerfluffle about some jackass claiming Bayonetta was sexist, when an interview with the dev team later essentially explained that the centerpiece of Bayonetta was creating an empowered female character with intimidating, if not weaponized, sexuality, and essentially making the guy behind it out to be a herp of the very derpiest scale.