Formula 1 Discussion - And favourite driver?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
In case of Andretti having a team, that's fine with me. As long as they don't go out of their way and replace Spa and Silverstone with a Tilke-track on a parking lot in Detroit or something equally silly.

"Both Ferraris are out after being attacked by gangs"

"Bottas is into the pits and he's up on bricks"

" That Merc is pourpoising terribly down the straight, wait that's a low rider"

~ Detroit F1 race, probably

Hopefully Andretti get in, they have a lot of experience running a team over multiple motorsports and winning. I also doubt he'd fail to get enough sponsors to cover most of the budget being a bigger name that Haas.
 
Let's see if the Andretti sperging leads to just as good results as all the hype they had for British American Racing entering a team and how amazing it was to get muricans involved.
 
Let's see if the Andretti sperging leads to just as good results as all the hype they had for British American Racing entering a team and how amazing it was to get muricans involved.
BAR was named for British American Tobacco and had not much to do with getting racing to be American. For that in the relatively modern era you can point to the Haas (Carl) efforts in the 80s, the total abortion of USF1, or the Haas (Gene) team of today. None of which has moved the needle much.
 
Miami might be a decent racetrack (if there was no DRS shenanigans), but holy cow :story:
You ready for some fake water with boats on wooden stands?

miami fake water.png
 
BAR was named for British American Tobacco and had not much to do with getting racing to be American
True but that didn't stop pundits going absolute fucking nuts about them and how great it would be to have an American linked team for pretty much an entire season before they joined. This "muh 'murican audience" hype has been on and off with the pundits and FOM for pretty much as long as I have been watching the sport. For example THE Indianapolis race all the commentators could go on about was how much it would harm F1 in 'murica rather than say talking about how we got there etc.

I wonder if Hambone is going to do some crying about the leaked SCOTUS verdict this weekend? He's the exact sort of person to totally misunderstand how something works and get wrapped up in the virtue signalling.
 
Last edited:
True but that didn't stop pundits going absolute fucking nuts about them and how great it would be to have an American linked team for pretty much an entire season before they joined.
These pundits had obviously never heard of MasterCard Lola. Lola, a British team, was doing OK (if not brilliantly) until Mastercard - an American company - got involved.
 
Interesting few lines from SEB here, first thing I decided to do after reading it was, of course, go straight to reddit to see them defend the Dopamine injectors.

I'd post a few, but I really don't want to since half of the arguments all astound me, it's mainly LewLew flairs complaining about how much F1 'needs' it and essentially trying to bargain it down to it still existing, rather than admitting it basically kills any short-term strategy in just about any race that allows a lot of passing.
 
DRS just kills exciting overtakes and defensive drives. Why overtake by outbraking your opponent into a corner when you can wait until the straight to get DRS, especially now you can follow much easier until the straight? Why risk staying out on an old tyre to try and hold your position when you'll just be driven round on a straight where you can't try to defend?

I swear the people who love the system don't even know why they think more overtaking makes race better, they've just been told that's the case.

Imola is the ultimate example of DRS shitting racing up. Before it was switched on there were some great overtakes in corners that often aren't overtaking places through driver skill. Once it was switched on then every ovetake became before they even got to T1 after having DRS down the straight. Also DRS didn't help Gastley or Hambone get around Albon who didn't have it so it's not the magic bullet to preventing drivers getting stuck in the pack they make out.
 
DRS just kills exciting overtakes and defensive drives. Why overtake by outbraking your opponent into a corner when you can wait until the straight to get DRS, especially now you can follow much easier until the straight? Why risk staying out on an old tyre to try and hold your position when you'll just be driven round on a straight where you can't try to defend?

I swear the people who love the system don't even know why they think more overtaking makes race better, they've just been told that's the case.

Imola is the ultimate example of DRS shitting racing up. Before it was switched on there were some great overtakes in corners that often aren't overtaking places through driver skill. Once it was switched on then every ovetake became before they even got to T1 after having DRS down the straight. Also DRS didn't help Gastley or Hambone get around Albon who didn't have it so it's not the magic bullet to preventing drivers getting stuck in the pack they make out.
I'd like to see a move to something like Indycar's push-to-pass.

It's not limited to a single portion of the track, and the drivers have to manage their usage so they don't run out. It can also be used defensively to prevent being overtaken
 
I'd like to see a move to something like Indycar's push-to-pass.

It's not limited to a single portion of the track, and the drivers have to manage their usage so they don't run out. It can also be used defensively to prevent being overtaken
They already kind have that with the electrical energy deployment. They're drastically increasing its power in 2026 too.

As it is it just turns into the car infront deploying on the straight to defend from DRS making it just another part of that whole mess of a system.
 
Rumours started by some Spanish F1 journo about some "insider info" is that there will eb a driver swap between two teams sometime this season.

View attachment 3217044

The main speculation is Ricciardo for Gastly (though why would Ricciardo go back to the red bull set up?). The other mentioned name is Vettel retiring mid season though I doubt that.

The best swap would be kick Zhou's underperforming by a long way ass out of that car and put Piastri in that seat. Alfa would be in a position to fight for 3rd/4th in the WCC with two good drivers.

In the end as long as it isn't Hamilton lucking his way into a fast car I'm fine. In before FIA/FOM threaten ferrari into taking hamildouche.
So, I saw a video in my recommends on YT and remembered we discussed this. We have potential names for the swap now, let's see if it plays out. If it does, then Williams thankfully aren't relying on his bags of cash. Most likely because RB gave them a chunk to put Albon in. Either way, although he is Canadian, I won't be sad to see him go! One down, one to go! I just hope he doesn't go to Indy and start continuing to be an embarrassment there.

Speaking of Indy, I watch all the races and last weekend's was pretty fine. And Grosjean is starting to piss people off. It did look like he ran into Rahal intentionally, but that's racing man! LOL He finished ahead of him so that was good.

Anyway, here is the vid concerning the potential swap.
 
So any thoughts about Mercedes getting their upgrades? the last package didn't seem to work as intended so I am curious on how this one will work out. Plus Mercedes is probably stretching their budget cap with all these parts. Imagine if they reach the cap befor the summer break. No more upgrades just scooting by in the hopes nobody gets faster. Then again maybe they will find that one magic bullet that makes their concept "work" (tbh I hope they don't)
 
"Oh Hamilton is only behind because he is unlucky and besides he's the one taking one for the team doing the development."

SmartSelect_20220505-193243_Brave.jpg SmartSelect_20220505-193302_Brave.jpg SmartSelect_20220505-193313_Brave.jpg

Fucking cope harder Hill, the BBC you've been sucking for years is impotent.
 
"Oh Hamilton is only behind because he is unlucky and besides he's the one taking one for the team doing the development."

View attachment 3250985View attachment 3250986View attachment 3250987

Fucking cope harder Hill, the BBC you've been sucking for years is impotent.
Yeah sure, we're only 4 races in... I mean, it's only roughly a sixth of the whole season, no biggie. And besides, of course Larbleton is doing a fine job developing the car, after all he's worldwide reknown for his prowess when it comes to the technical aspects of his game! Fucking. L. O. L.
 

DRS zones altered ahead of first track running at Miami​

Posted on 4th May 2022, 18:45 | Written by Hazel Southwell

Formula 1 has revised the three DRS zones which will be used for this weekend’s inaugural Miami Grand Prix.

Each zone on the 5.4-kilometre Miami International Autodrome has its own detection point. Since the original zones were defined yesterday the positions of those points have been slightly altered, and one activation zone has also been extended.

The first detection point is positioned 83 metres after turn eight, which is seven metres earlier than originally planned. This zone has been extended by 37 metres, as drivers can activate DRS 30 metres after turn nine. This forms part of a long, high-speed section through turn 10, leading to a potential overtaking spot at turn 11.

The second DRS detection point follows at the end of sector two, 70 metres after turn 16, three metres earlier than before. The activation point, 450 metres after that corner, is unchanged

The final detection zone is at the opposite end of that straight, 15 metres after turn 17, which is a sharp left-hand hairpin. That detection point is four metres earlier than before but its activation point, at the apex of turn 19 at the end of the lap, is unchanged.

Three DRS zones has been typical of the venues F1 has visited so far this season. Only one track, Imola, had fewer. Albert Park initially boasted four, but that was cut to three following the first day of running.

The speed trap for Miami International Autodrome has been places 200m before turn 17, at the end of the long back straight and in theory when drivers should be at absolute maximum speed, despite the proximity of the walls.

FIA begins new clampdown on underwear and jewellery rules for drivers​

Posted on 5th May 2022, 22:35 | Written by Will Wood

FIA Formula 1 race director Niels Wittich has told all teams they must confirm their drivers are complying with underwear and jewellery regulations during events.

Prior to the start of each race weekend, all competitors are compelled by the rules to complete a scrutineering declaration form where teams declare that their cars and equipment comply with the various technical regulations.

Prior to the start of the Miami Grand Prix practice tomorrow, Wittich informed all 10 teams the declaration form will be amended to “include checks relating to compliance with Appendix L to the International Sporting Code (ISC), Chapter III, specifically Article 2 concerning compliant underwear and Article 5 concerning the wearing of jewellery.”

The International Sporting Code states that drivers must wear “long underwear” as well as other fire resistant clothing that are homologated to FIA standards. It also states that wearing jewellery during competition “in the form of body piercing or metal neck chains” is prohibited. With the new change to the scrutineering declaration form, teams must declare their drivers adhere to both requirements during race weekends.

A note added to the scrutineering form explains that the additional declaration “is written to ensure that the FIA-approved Flame-resistant clothing, including both the outer layer overalls and inner layer in contact with the skin can operate effectively and provide the designed level of protection if exposed to flames.”

“The use of non-flameproof materials in contact with the driver’s skin, and in particular synthetic materials, can reduce heat transmission protection and thus increase the risk of burn injuries in the event of a fire,” it continues. “In the worst case such materials may melt which can hinder treatment in the event of a burn injury.”

Regarding the wearing of jewellery, the FIA states that it is prohibited due to it “reducing the protection” to drivers from their fireproof clothing as it can catch against clothing when it is removed in an emergency.

“The wearing of jewellery during the competition can hinder both medical interventions as well as subsequent diagnosis and treatment should it be required following an accident,” the FIA explained.

“In the case that medical imaging is required to inform diagnosis following an accident the presence of jewellery on the body can cause significant complication and delay. In the worst case the presence of jewellery during imaging may cause further injury.”

The clampdown on drivers flouting the rules comes after driver underwear requirements was raised as part of the drivers’ briefing with race director Wittich at the Australian Grand Prix. Lewis Hamilton said he is unable to remove certain piercings from his body due to how they were fitted.

“They’re stuff that I can’t move,” Hamilton said. “I literally can’t even take these out – these ones in my right ear – they’re literally welded in, so I’d have to get them chopped off or something like that. So they’ll be staying.”
 
Lewis Hamilton said he is unable to remove certain piercings from his body due to how they were fitted.

“They’re stuff that I can’t move,” Hamilton said. “I literally can’t even take these out – these ones in my right ear – they’re literally welded in, so I’d have to get them chopped off or something like that. So they’ll be staying.”
So he’s not going to race this weekend then?
 
Back
Top Bottom